SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Donald Trump has nominated Gina Haspel to run the Central Intelligence Agency. (Photo: CIA / with overlay)
CIA Propaganda Denounced as Durbin Sounds Alarm Over Agency Effort to Whitewash Haspel's Torturous Past
"The CIA's effort to promote the Haspel nomination appears to be without precedent in recent history."
May 08, 2018
As Gina Haspel faces mounting opposition ahead of her Wednesday confirmation hearing to head the CIA, the Senate's top Democrat is raising concerns about the agency's "robust" public relations campaign--which other critics have called a "domestic propaganda" operation--to distract from and downplay Haspel's role in the Bush administration's post-9/11 torture program.
"These efforts to promote a national security nomination appear to be without precedent in recent history," Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), vice chairman of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, wrote in a letter (pdf) to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats on Tuesday. "Official resources of the CIA have been used for an extensive public relations campaign to newspapers and other media outlets to generate favorable coverage of Ms. Haspel's nomination."
After outlining the CIA's pro-Haspel campaign with a list of press releases and tweets from the agency's verified account, the senator urged Coats "to consider whether the CIA's efforts to promote this nomination are in keeping with the best interests of the intelligence community, and whether additional steps are warranted to review the public affairs postures of each component of the intelligence community."
Noting that "Congress has enacted several laws that prohibit the use of appropriated funds to attempt to influence congressional action on legislative matters," Durbin wrote that "while these laws do not specifically apply to nominations.... [o]ur intelligence agencies and our intelligence officers have the duty to provide objective intelligence to inform the policy making process."
The senator's letter comes amid growing frustration over the CIA's refusal to publicly disclose more details about Haspel's "highly secretive and reportedly torture-filled record." It also follows the CIA's decision to declassify a memo that "cleared" Haspel of any wrongdoing with regard to her role in destroying video recordings of agency operatives torturing people.
Leading up to the hearing scheduled for Wednesday, many other ethics experts, elected officials, and human rights advocates have expressed concerns about the CIA's efforts to pressure lawmakers to approve Haspel's nomination.
"I've been in and around politics and policy-making for about three decades now, and I certainly have not seen anything like this," Mark Keam, Durbin's former chief counsel and a current Democratic Virginia state delegate said on Jeremy Scahill's "Intercepted" podcast last week. However, Keam noted, the move isn't necessarily shocking.
"The CIA is excellent at propaganda," Keam pointed out. "Our nation's and global history is full of examples where the CIA went in and undermined governments across the world, and propped up regimes that they would like to see happen. And so to the extent that they are good at undermining society and building up and rebuilding reputations of certain members...that's something that the CIA has had many, many decades of experience [with]."
In addition to releasing documents designed to make Haspel appear more appealing, Scahill acknowledged that "the CIA has waged what I think can only be accurately described as a domestic propaganda campaign on Twitter that is aimed at the American public."
"On the CIA Twitter feed, Haspel is portrayed as a heroic, glass-ceiling breaking super spy," Scahill concluded. "It's really cringe-worthy stuff."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As Gina Haspel faces mounting opposition ahead of her Wednesday confirmation hearing to head the CIA, the Senate's top Democrat is raising concerns about the agency's "robust" public relations campaign--which other critics have called a "domestic propaganda" operation--to distract from and downplay Haspel's role in the Bush administration's post-9/11 torture program.
"These efforts to promote a national security nomination appear to be without precedent in recent history," Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), vice chairman of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, wrote in a letter (pdf) to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats on Tuesday. "Official resources of the CIA have been used for an extensive public relations campaign to newspapers and other media outlets to generate favorable coverage of Ms. Haspel's nomination."
After outlining the CIA's pro-Haspel campaign with a list of press releases and tweets from the agency's verified account, the senator urged Coats "to consider whether the CIA's efforts to promote this nomination are in keeping with the best interests of the intelligence community, and whether additional steps are warranted to review the public affairs postures of each component of the intelligence community."
Noting that "Congress has enacted several laws that prohibit the use of appropriated funds to attempt to influence congressional action on legislative matters," Durbin wrote that "while these laws do not specifically apply to nominations.... [o]ur intelligence agencies and our intelligence officers have the duty to provide objective intelligence to inform the policy making process."
The senator's letter comes amid growing frustration over the CIA's refusal to publicly disclose more details about Haspel's "highly secretive and reportedly torture-filled record." It also follows the CIA's decision to declassify a memo that "cleared" Haspel of any wrongdoing with regard to her role in destroying video recordings of agency operatives torturing people.
Leading up to the hearing scheduled for Wednesday, many other ethics experts, elected officials, and human rights advocates have expressed concerns about the CIA's efforts to pressure lawmakers to approve Haspel's nomination.
"I've been in and around politics and policy-making for about three decades now, and I certainly have not seen anything like this," Mark Keam, Durbin's former chief counsel and a current Democratic Virginia state delegate said on Jeremy Scahill's "Intercepted" podcast last week. However, Keam noted, the move isn't necessarily shocking.
"The CIA is excellent at propaganda," Keam pointed out. "Our nation's and global history is full of examples where the CIA went in and undermined governments across the world, and propped up regimes that they would like to see happen. And so to the extent that they are good at undermining society and building up and rebuilding reputations of certain members...that's something that the CIA has had many, many decades of experience [with]."
In addition to releasing documents designed to make Haspel appear more appealing, Scahill acknowledged that "the CIA has waged what I think can only be accurately described as a domestic propaganda campaign on Twitter that is aimed at the American public."
"On the CIA Twitter feed, Haspel is portrayed as a heroic, glass-ceiling breaking super spy," Scahill concluded. "It's really cringe-worthy stuff."
As Gina Haspel faces mounting opposition ahead of her Wednesday confirmation hearing to head the CIA, the Senate's top Democrat is raising concerns about the agency's "robust" public relations campaign--which other critics have called a "domestic propaganda" operation--to distract from and downplay Haspel's role in the Bush administration's post-9/11 torture program.
"These efforts to promote a national security nomination appear to be without precedent in recent history," Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), vice chairman of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, wrote in a letter (pdf) to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats on Tuesday. "Official resources of the CIA have been used for an extensive public relations campaign to newspapers and other media outlets to generate favorable coverage of Ms. Haspel's nomination."
After outlining the CIA's pro-Haspel campaign with a list of press releases and tweets from the agency's verified account, the senator urged Coats "to consider whether the CIA's efforts to promote this nomination are in keeping with the best interests of the intelligence community, and whether additional steps are warranted to review the public affairs postures of each component of the intelligence community."
Noting that "Congress has enacted several laws that prohibit the use of appropriated funds to attempt to influence congressional action on legislative matters," Durbin wrote that "while these laws do not specifically apply to nominations.... [o]ur intelligence agencies and our intelligence officers have the duty to provide objective intelligence to inform the policy making process."
The senator's letter comes amid growing frustration over the CIA's refusal to publicly disclose more details about Haspel's "highly secretive and reportedly torture-filled record." It also follows the CIA's decision to declassify a memo that "cleared" Haspel of any wrongdoing with regard to her role in destroying video recordings of agency operatives torturing people.
Leading up to the hearing scheduled for Wednesday, many other ethics experts, elected officials, and human rights advocates have expressed concerns about the CIA's efforts to pressure lawmakers to approve Haspel's nomination.
"I've been in and around politics and policy-making for about three decades now, and I certainly have not seen anything like this," Mark Keam, Durbin's former chief counsel and a current Democratic Virginia state delegate said on Jeremy Scahill's "Intercepted" podcast last week. However, Keam noted, the move isn't necessarily shocking.
"The CIA is excellent at propaganda," Keam pointed out. "Our nation's and global history is full of examples where the CIA went in and undermined governments across the world, and propped up regimes that they would like to see happen. And so to the extent that they are good at undermining society and building up and rebuilding reputations of certain members...that's something that the CIA has had many, many decades of experience [with]."
In addition to releasing documents designed to make Haspel appear more appealing, Scahill acknowledged that "the CIA has waged what I think can only be accurately described as a domestic propaganda campaign on Twitter that is aimed at the American public."
"On the CIA Twitter feed, Haspel is portrayed as a heroic, glass-ceiling breaking super spy," Scahill concluded. "It's really cringe-worthy stuff."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.