To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
U.S. President Donald Trump is flanked by National Security Advisor John Bolton as he speaks about the FBI raid at his lawyer Michael Cohen's office, while receiving a briefing from senior military leaders regarding Syria, in the Cabinet Room, on April 9, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Demonstrating just how easily the Trump administration's mixture of utter incompetence and malicious determination to undermine diplomacy can bring the U.S. to the brink of yet another war in a matter of minutes, the White House issued a statement Monday night falsely declaring that Iran "has a robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program"--only to quickly change the statement from "has" to "had" in the face of journalistic reporting and strong backlash.
\u201cNEW: White House official blames a \u201cclerical error\u201d for wrong tense \u2014 a \u201cmistake\u201d that significantly changed the meaning, especially since the Trump administration, as recently as this month, acknowledged Iran was complying with terms of the nuclear deal.\u201d— Peter Alexander (@Peter Alexander) 1525138480
\u201cA \u201cclerical error\u201d led the United States to accuse Iran of having an active and ongoing nuclear weapon program. \n\nThe details matter when you\u2019re talking about nukes, people. https://t.co/0hhMReyuVz\u201d— Martin Pfeiffer | NuclearAnthro@home.social (@Martin Pfeiffer | NuclearAnthro@home.social) 1525141248
While the White House was quick to explain away the potentially catastrophic mistake as a mere typo, Brian Beutler of Crooked Mediaargued this explanation "doesn't withstand scrutiny," given that the "original statement uses the word 'has' twice, strongly suggesting an intent to mislead the global public into believing Iran had covertly reactivated its nuclear weapons program in direct defiance of the agreement."
After admitting its "clerical error" to reporters, the White House quietly deleted its previous tweet publicizing the statement--which came shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's "bizarre" speech claiming Iran is violating the terms of the nuclear deal--without "offering any apology to those who thought the U.S. was going to war with Iran."
"If Iran no longer has a robust clandestine program, the White House just admitted that the Iran deal is working."
--Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council
Allusions to the lies leading up to America's 2003 invasion of Iraq have been made frequently over the past several days as President Donald Trump continues to ratchet up tensions with Iran, and observers found it impossible not to make the same comparison following the White House's "error" Monday night--particularly with the experienced intelligence manipulator John Bolton leading Trump's national security team.
Referring to Bolton, Margaret Hartmann of New York Magazine noted that "Trump just brought on a national security adviser who promoted false information to justify the war in Iraq, and has made it very clear that he's interested in bombing Iran."
Iran, for its part, has repeatedly stated in recent days that it has no plans to develop a nuclear weapon, even if U.S. President Donald Trump decides to walk away from the nuclear accord this month.
Even if it were true that Iran was actively attempting to develop a nuke prior to the implementation of the nuclear accord--as the U.S. and Israel are claiming--National Iranian American Council president Trita Parsi notes that the fact Iran is not currently pursuing nuclear weapons is evidence that the agreement has been effective.
"If Iran no longer has a robust clandestine program, the White House just admitted that the Iran deal is working," Parsi wrote on Twitter Monday night.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Demonstrating just how easily the Trump administration's mixture of utter incompetence and malicious determination to undermine diplomacy can bring the U.S. to the brink of yet another war in a matter of minutes, the White House issued a statement Monday night falsely declaring that Iran "has a robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program"--only to quickly change the statement from "has" to "had" in the face of journalistic reporting and strong backlash.
\u201cNEW: White House official blames a \u201cclerical error\u201d for wrong tense \u2014 a \u201cmistake\u201d that significantly changed the meaning, especially since the Trump administration, as recently as this month, acknowledged Iran was complying with terms of the nuclear deal.\u201d— Peter Alexander (@Peter Alexander) 1525138480
\u201cA \u201cclerical error\u201d led the United States to accuse Iran of having an active and ongoing nuclear weapon program. \n\nThe details matter when you\u2019re talking about nukes, people. https://t.co/0hhMReyuVz\u201d— Martin Pfeiffer | NuclearAnthro@home.social (@Martin Pfeiffer | NuclearAnthro@home.social) 1525141248
While the White House was quick to explain away the potentially catastrophic mistake as a mere typo, Brian Beutler of Crooked Mediaargued this explanation "doesn't withstand scrutiny," given that the "original statement uses the word 'has' twice, strongly suggesting an intent to mislead the global public into believing Iran had covertly reactivated its nuclear weapons program in direct defiance of the agreement."
After admitting its "clerical error" to reporters, the White House quietly deleted its previous tweet publicizing the statement--which came shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's "bizarre" speech claiming Iran is violating the terms of the nuclear deal--without "offering any apology to those who thought the U.S. was going to war with Iran."
"If Iran no longer has a robust clandestine program, the White House just admitted that the Iran deal is working."
--Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council
Allusions to the lies leading up to America's 2003 invasion of Iraq have been made frequently over the past several days as President Donald Trump continues to ratchet up tensions with Iran, and observers found it impossible not to make the same comparison following the White House's "error" Monday night--particularly with the experienced intelligence manipulator John Bolton leading Trump's national security team.
Referring to Bolton, Margaret Hartmann of New York Magazine noted that "Trump just brought on a national security adviser who promoted false information to justify the war in Iraq, and has made it very clear that he's interested in bombing Iran."
Iran, for its part, has repeatedly stated in recent days that it has no plans to develop a nuclear weapon, even if U.S. President Donald Trump decides to walk away from the nuclear accord this month.
Even if it were true that Iran was actively attempting to develop a nuke prior to the implementation of the nuclear accord--as the U.S. and Israel are claiming--National Iranian American Council president Trita Parsi notes that the fact Iran is not currently pursuing nuclear weapons is evidence that the agreement has been effective.
"If Iran no longer has a robust clandestine program, the White House just admitted that the Iran deal is working," Parsi wrote on Twitter Monday night.
Demonstrating just how easily the Trump administration's mixture of utter incompetence and malicious determination to undermine diplomacy can bring the U.S. to the brink of yet another war in a matter of minutes, the White House issued a statement Monday night falsely declaring that Iran "has a robust, clandestine nuclear weapons program"--only to quickly change the statement from "has" to "had" in the face of journalistic reporting and strong backlash.
\u201cNEW: White House official blames a \u201cclerical error\u201d for wrong tense \u2014 a \u201cmistake\u201d that significantly changed the meaning, especially since the Trump administration, as recently as this month, acknowledged Iran was complying with terms of the nuclear deal.\u201d— Peter Alexander (@Peter Alexander) 1525138480
\u201cA \u201cclerical error\u201d led the United States to accuse Iran of having an active and ongoing nuclear weapon program. \n\nThe details matter when you\u2019re talking about nukes, people. https://t.co/0hhMReyuVz\u201d— Martin Pfeiffer | NuclearAnthro@home.social (@Martin Pfeiffer | NuclearAnthro@home.social) 1525141248
While the White House was quick to explain away the potentially catastrophic mistake as a mere typo, Brian Beutler of Crooked Mediaargued this explanation "doesn't withstand scrutiny," given that the "original statement uses the word 'has' twice, strongly suggesting an intent to mislead the global public into believing Iran had covertly reactivated its nuclear weapons program in direct defiance of the agreement."
After admitting its "clerical error" to reporters, the White House quietly deleted its previous tweet publicizing the statement--which came shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's "bizarre" speech claiming Iran is violating the terms of the nuclear deal--without "offering any apology to those who thought the U.S. was going to war with Iran."
"If Iran no longer has a robust clandestine program, the White House just admitted that the Iran deal is working."
--Trita Parsi, National Iranian American Council
Allusions to the lies leading up to America's 2003 invasion of Iraq have been made frequently over the past several days as President Donald Trump continues to ratchet up tensions with Iran, and observers found it impossible not to make the same comparison following the White House's "error" Monday night--particularly with the experienced intelligence manipulator John Bolton leading Trump's national security team.
Referring to Bolton, Margaret Hartmann of New York Magazine noted that "Trump just brought on a national security adviser who promoted false information to justify the war in Iraq, and has made it very clear that he's interested in bombing Iran."
Iran, for its part, has repeatedly stated in recent days that it has no plans to develop a nuclear weapon, even if U.S. President Donald Trump decides to walk away from the nuclear accord this month.
Even if it were true that Iran was actively attempting to develop a nuke prior to the implementation of the nuclear accord--as the U.S. and Israel are claiming--National Iranian American Council president Trita Parsi notes that the fact Iran is not currently pursuing nuclear weapons is evidence that the agreement has been effective.
"If Iran no longer has a robust clandestine program, the White House just admitted that the Iran deal is working," Parsi wrote on Twitter Monday night.