

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Immigrant rights activists urged lawmakers to reject the spending bill released on Wednesday night, which leaves out the DREAM Act but includes funding for a border wall and detention centers. (Photo: Rodney Dunning/Flickr/cc)
With funding for President Donald Trump's plan for a border wall but no protection for young immigrants, known as "Dreamers," who were brought to the U.S. as children, immigrant rights activists on Thursday called the spending deal released by lawmakers this week an affront to immigrants across the country, and demanded that Democrats who claim to support their communities reject the plan.
"This budget is a slap in the face to the immigrant community," Steven Choi, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC), said in a statement. "While Congress congratulates itself, this budget funds the deportation machine, criminalizes immigrants, and neglects the 800,000 hardworking Dreamers still stuck in limbo. America will not be greater or safer by undermining our immigrant communities."
The budget deal includes $1.5 billion to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border as well as funding for 45,000 beds in detention facilities and to pay 100 immigration judges and 60 attorneys for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Meanwhile, the DREAM Act, which would offer permanent protection and a path to citizenship to young undocumented immigrants, has been left out of the deal.
Since Trump announced he would rescind protections for young undocumented immigrants under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Act, wrote Choi, 15,000 people have lost their DACA status, putting them at risk for deportation even though they have lived and worked in the U.S. for years.
The Supreme Court last month upheld a federal judge's order that the government continue approving and renewing DACA applications despite Trump's attempts to gut the program--but immigrant rights groups stress that this is only a temporary solution, and demand passage of the DREAM Act without funding for deportations, detentions, and a border wall.
"Some Democratic leaders appear willing to vote for a spending bill that does not include the DREAM Act, and would also give Trump his deportation agents, so that they can get cash for other priorities," wrote Greisa Martinez Rosas, deputy executive director of United We Dream, in The Hill. "Our message to all members of Congress--Republicans and Democrats--is that they must oppose any spending deal that includes additional funding for the deportation and detention of immigrants."
"We're tired of hearing politicians say that they stand with immigrants, while enabling Trump's deportation agents to terrorize our communities," Rosas added.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
With funding for President Donald Trump's plan for a border wall but no protection for young immigrants, known as "Dreamers," who were brought to the U.S. as children, immigrant rights activists on Thursday called the spending deal released by lawmakers this week an affront to immigrants across the country, and demanded that Democrats who claim to support their communities reject the plan.
"This budget is a slap in the face to the immigrant community," Steven Choi, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC), said in a statement. "While Congress congratulates itself, this budget funds the deportation machine, criminalizes immigrants, and neglects the 800,000 hardworking Dreamers still stuck in limbo. America will not be greater or safer by undermining our immigrant communities."
The budget deal includes $1.5 billion to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border as well as funding for 45,000 beds in detention facilities and to pay 100 immigration judges and 60 attorneys for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Meanwhile, the DREAM Act, which would offer permanent protection and a path to citizenship to young undocumented immigrants, has been left out of the deal.
Since Trump announced he would rescind protections for young undocumented immigrants under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Act, wrote Choi, 15,000 people have lost their DACA status, putting them at risk for deportation even though they have lived and worked in the U.S. for years.
The Supreme Court last month upheld a federal judge's order that the government continue approving and renewing DACA applications despite Trump's attempts to gut the program--but immigrant rights groups stress that this is only a temporary solution, and demand passage of the DREAM Act without funding for deportations, detentions, and a border wall.
"Some Democratic leaders appear willing to vote for a spending bill that does not include the DREAM Act, and would also give Trump his deportation agents, so that they can get cash for other priorities," wrote Greisa Martinez Rosas, deputy executive director of United We Dream, in The Hill. "Our message to all members of Congress--Republicans and Democrats--is that they must oppose any spending deal that includes additional funding for the deportation and detention of immigrants."
"We're tired of hearing politicians say that they stand with immigrants, while enabling Trump's deportation agents to terrorize our communities," Rosas added.
With funding for President Donald Trump's plan for a border wall but no protection for young immigrants, known as "Dreamers," who were brought to the U.S. as children, immigrant rights activists on Thursday called the spending deal released by lawmakers this week an affront to immigrants across the country, and demanded that Democrats who claim to support their communities reject the plan.
"This budget is a slap in the face to the immigrant community," Steven Choi, executive director of the New York Immigration Coalition (NYIC), said in a statement. "While Congress congratulates itself, this budget funds the deportation machine, criminalizes immigrants, and neglects the 800,000 hardworking Dreamers still stuck in limbo. America will not be greater or safer by undermining our immigrant communities."
The budget deal includes $1.5 billion to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border as well as funding for 45,000 beds in detention facilities and to pay 100 immigration judges and 60 attorneys for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Meanwhile, the DREAM Act, which would offer permanent protection and a path to citizenship to young undocumented immigrants, has been left out of the deal.
Since Trump announced he would rescind protections for young undocumented immigrants under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Act, wrote Choi, 15,000 people have lost their DACA status, putting them at risk for deportation even though they have lived and worked in the U.S. for years.
The Supreme Court last month upheld a federal judge's order that the government continue approving and renewing DACA applications despite Trump's attempts to gut the program--but immigrant rights groups stress that this is only a temporary solution, and demand passage of the DREAM Act without funding for deportations, detentions, and a border wall.
"Some Democratic leaders appear willing to vote for a spending bill that does not include the DREAM Act, and would also give Trump his deportation agents, so that they can get cash for other priorities," wrote Greisa Martinez Rosas, deputy executive director of United We Dream, in The Hill. "Our message to all members of Congress--Republicans and Democrats--is that they must oppose any spending deal that includes additional funding for the deportation and detention of immigrants."
"We're tired of hearing politicians say that they stand with immigrants, while enabling Trump's deportation agents to terrorize our communities," Rosas added.