"Internet users and businesses cannot afford to be left unprotected while Congress decides what they're going to do about the FCC's deeply unpopular repeal," Evan Greer of Fight for the Future said in a statement. (Photo: Free Press/Flickr)
Mar 15, 2018
With the deadline for Congress to repeal the Republican-controlled FCC's attack on net neutrality rapidly approaching, California lawmakers on Wednesday introduced what is being applauded as the "strongest and most comprehensive" state-level net neutrality bill in the nation.
"People are looking for net neutrality protections wherever they can find them, at city hall, their statehouses, and in Congress."
--Matt Wood, Free Press
If passed, the legislation would in some ways go even further than the 2015 net neutrality protections that the FCC voted to repeal last December.
In addition to prohibiting internet service providers (ISPs) from throttling and blocking web content, the California bill (SB-822)--spearheaded by Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener--would also "in many cases ban broadband providers from exempting certain content from data limits, a concept known as 'zero rating,'" noted Klint Finley of Wired in a summary of the measure on Wednesday.
\u201cIf this passes, California will have the strongest and most comprehensive state-level #NetNeutrality protections in the country. TELL YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS TO DO THIS HERE: https://t.co/SCT45RZghr https://t.co/VGaUKhFgur\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521047703
While acknowledging that the ultimate goal remains protecting net neutrality at the federal level, the advocacy group Free Press celebrated California's aggressive effort to defend the open internet from the FCC's attack as "a strong message to holdouts in Washington, where too many politicians and bureaucrats are ignoring the widespread public support for net neutrality."
"People are looking for net neutrality protections wherever they can find them, at city hall, their statehouses, and in Congress," Matt Wood, policy director at the Free Press Action Fund, said in a statement on Thursday. "These diverse measures in cities and states across the country pose a direct challenge to failed policies and flawed legal arguments underpinning the Trump FCC's harmful and wrong-headed decision to gut Net Neutrality protections."
"Internet users and businesses cannot afford to be left unprotected while Congress decides what they're going to do about the FCC's deeply unpopular repeal."
--Evan Greer, Fight for the Future
In taking steps toward safeguarding net neutrality from the FCC's repeal--which was officially published in the Federal Register last month--California joins more than 30 states that have introduced or are considering either legislation or executive actions to shield the open internet from corporate manipulation.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, a growing number municipalities--by signing the Cities Open Internet Pledge (pdf)--have also vowed to refuse to do business with ISPs that don't support net neutrality.
At the national level, the Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) needs just one more Republican vote for his Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to clear the Senate. If passed, the measure will move to the House, where it will need 218 votes to reach President Donald Trump's desk. The deadline for Congress to pass the CRA--which would restore net neutrality protections--is April 23.
"Internet users and businesses cannot afford to be left unprotected while Congress decides what they're going to do about the FCC's deeply unpopular repeal," Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, said in a statement on Wednesday. "Thankfully states like California are stepping up, but Congress needs to follow suit and support the CRA to restore protections for all."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With the deadline for Congress to repeal the Republican-controlled FCC's attack on net neutrality rapidly approaching, California lawmakers on Wednesday introduced what is being applauded as the "strongest and most comprehensive" state-level net neutrality bill in the nation.
"People are looking for net neutrality protections wherever they can find them, at city hall, their statehouses, and in Congress."
--Matt Wood, Free Press
If passed, the legislation would in some ways go even further than the 2015 net neutrality protections that the FCC voted to repeal last December.
In addition to prohibiting internet service providers (ISPs) from throttling and blocking web content, the California bill (SB-822)--spearheaded by Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener--would also "in many cases ban broadband providers from exempting certain content from data limits, a concept known as 'zero rating,'" noted Klint Finley of Wired in a summary of the measure on Wednesday.
\u201cIf this passes, California will have the strongest and most comprehensive state-level #NetNeutrality protections in the country. TELL YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS TO DO THIS HERE: https://t.co/SCT45RZghr https://t.co/VGaUKhFgur\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521047703
While acknowledging that the ultimate goal remains protecting net neutrality at the federal level, the advocacy group Free Press celebrated California's aggressive effort to defend the open internet from the FCC's attack as "a strong message to holdouts in Washington, where too many politicians and bureaucrats are ignoring the widespread public support for net neutrality."
"People are looking for net neutrality protections wherever they can find them, at city hall, their statehouses, and in Congress," Matt Wood, policy director at the Free Press Action Fund, said in a statement on Thursday. "These diverse measures in cities and states across the country pose a direct challenge to failed policies and flawed legal arguments underpinning the Trump FCC's harmful and wrong-headed decision to gut Net Neutrality protections."
"Internet users and businesses cannot afford to be left unprotected while Congress decides what they're going to do about the FCC's deeply unpopular repeal."
--Evan Greer, Fight for the Future
In taking steps toward safeguarding net neutrality from the FCC's repeal--which was officially published in the Federal Register last month--California joins more than 30 states that have introduced or are considering either legislation or executive actions to shield the open internet from corporate manipulation.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, a growing number municipalities--by signing the Cities Open Internet Pledge (pdf)--have also vowed to refuse to do business with ISPs that don't support net neutrality.
At the national level, the Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) needs just one more Republican vote for his Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to clear the Senate. If passed, the measure will move to the House, where it will need 218 votes to reach President Donald Trump's desk. The deadline for Congress to pass the CRA--which would restore net neutrality protections--is April 23.
"Internet users and businesses cannot afford to be left unprotected while Congress decides what they're going to do about the FCC's deeply unpopular repeal," Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, said in a statement on Wednesday. "Thankfully states like California are stepping up, but Congress needs to follow suit and support the CRA to restore protections for all."
With the deadline for Congress to repeal the Republican-controlled FCC's attack on net neutrality rapidly approaching, California lawmakers on Wednesday introduced what is being applauded as the "strongest and most comprehensive" state-level net neutrality bill in the nation.
"People are looking for net neutrality protections wherever they can find them, at city hall, their statehouses, and in Congress."
--Matt Wood, Free Press
If passed, the legislation would in some ways go even further than the 2015 net neutrality protections that the FCC voted to repeal last December.
In addition to prohibiting internet service providers (ISPs) from throttling and blocking web content, the California bill (SB-822)--spearheaded by Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener--would also "in many cases ban broadband providers from exempting certain content from data limits, a concept known as 'zero rating,'" noted Klint Finley of Wired in a summary of the measure on Wednesday.
\u201cIf this passes, California will have the strongest and most comprehensive state-level #NetNeutrality protections in the country. TELL YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS TO DO THIS HERE: https://t.co/SCT45RZghr https://t.co/VGaUKhFgur\u201d— @team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon (@@team@fightforthefuture.org on Mastodon) 1521047703
While acknowledging that the ultimate goal remains protecting net neutrality at the federal level, the advocacy group Free Press celebrated California's aggressive effort to defend the open internet from the FCC's attack as "a strong message to holdouts in Washington, where too many politicians and bureaucrats are ignoring the widespread public support for net neutrality."
"People are looking for net neutrality protections wherever they can find them, at city hall, their statehouses, and in Congress," Matt Wood, policy director at the Free Press Action Fund, said in a statement on Thursday. "These diverse measures in cities and states across the country pose a direct challenge to failed policies and flawed legal arguments underpinning the Trump FCC's harmful and wrong-headed decision to gut Net Neutrality protections."
"Internet users and businesses cannot afford to be left unprotected while Congress decides what they're going to do about the FCC's deeply unpopular repeal."
--Evan Greer, Fight for the Future
In taking steps toward safeguarding net neutrality from the FCC's repeal--which was officially published in the Federal Register last month--California joins more than 30 states that have introduced or are considering either legislation or executive actions to shield the open internet from corporate manipulation.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, a growing number municipalities--by signing the Cities Open Internet Pledge (pdf)--have also vowed to refuse to do business with ISPs that don't support net neutrality.
At the national level, the Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) needs just one more Republican vote for his Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to clear the Senate. If passed, the measure will move to the House, where it will need 218 votes to reach President Donald Trump's desk. The deadline for Congress to pass the CRA--which would restore net neutrality protections--is April 23.
"Internet users and businesses cannot afford to be left unprotected while Congress decides what they're going to do about the FCC's deeply unpopular repeal," Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, said in a statement on Wednesday. "Thankfully states like California are stepping up, but Congress needs to follow suit and support the CRA to restore protections for all."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.