SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Virginia Sens. Mark Warner and Tim Kaine talk during a fundraising event at the Science Museum of Virginia August 14, 2008 in Richmond, Virginia. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
On 10th Anniversary of Wall Street Crash, Democrats Help GOP Set Stage for Next One
"Can Schumer's Democrats claim to fight for the little guy after deregulating 25 of the country's 40 biggest banks—and making it more likely the little guy's money will be used to give them bailouts?"
Mar 15, 2018
Democrats had the power to stop a massive big bank giveaway from passing the Senate Wednesday night, but instead they decided--with a "green light" from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y)--to hand the GOP more than enough votes to ram the deregulatory bill through instead, commemorating the tenth anniversary of the 2008 financial crisis by significantly increasing the risk of another one.
"The Senate Democrats who joined the GOP to deliver this bank giveaway were as politically short-sighted as they were reckless in putting our economy at risk."
--Kurt Walters, Rootstrikers
In addition to Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), 16 Democrats joined a unified Republican caucus in approving the so-called "Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act."
Rootstrikers, an anti-corruption group that worked for weeks to mobilize against what progressive critics have termed the "Bank Lobbyist Act," called Wednesday's vote "a shameful moment for the Senate" and placed much of the blame on Schumer, who voted against the measure but refused to whip against it.
"The Senate Democrats who joined the GOP to deliver this bank giveaway were as politically short-sighted as they were reckless in putting our economy at risk," Rootstrikers campaign director Kurt Walters said in a statement following the measure's passage. "Can Schumer's Democrats claim to fight for the little guy after deregulating 25 of the country's 40 biggest banks--and making it more likely the little guy's money will be used to give them bailouts?"
While Democratic supporters of the bill continued insisting to the very end it is aimed at providing relief to over-burdened community banks, numerous independent analyses have shown that the legislation's most consequential provisions are aimed at relieving massive banks that received upwards of $40 billion in bailout money during the 2008 financial crisis.
Even Equifax--a large credit-reporting company that suffered an enormous data breach last year and waited six weeks to inform the public--will benefit greatly from the legislation if it is passed in its current form.
"In addition to setting the stage for another taxpayer-funded bailout, this bill reduces safeguards against discriminatory, predatory lending for some of the most vulnerable consumers," Lisa Gilbert, vice president of legislative affairs at Public Citizen, said in a statement.
As consumer groups, former regulators, civil rights organizations, and labor unions denounced the bill's passage on Wednesday, the measure's success did find one welcome audience: the Trump White House.
Having successfully made its way through the Senate after weeks of debate, the largest deregulatory measure since the financial crisis is now headed to the House, where it could be altered--but probably not in favor of consumers, as the House deregulation push has been even more extreme than the Senate's.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) vowed to pick up where his progressive colleagues in the Senate left off by doing everything he can to make sure the bill fails.
"Some of my colleagues may have forgotten about how bad the financial crash was, but I haven't," Ellison wrote. "Analysis by the nonpartisan CBO found this bill increases the likelihood of another taxpayer bailout. I will do everything in my power to fight it in the House."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Democrats had the power to stop a massive big bank giveaway from passing the Senate Wednesday night, but instead they decided--with a "green light" from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y)--to hand the GOP more than enough votes to ram the deregulatory bill through instead, commemorating the tenth anniversary of the 2008 financial crisis by significantly increasing the risk of another one.
"The Senate Democrats who joined the GOP to deliver this bank giveaway were as politically short-sighted as they were reckless in putting our economy at risk."
--Kurt Walters, Rootstrikers
In addition to Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), 16 Democrats joined a unified Republican caucus in approving the so-called "Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act."
Rootstrikers, an anti-corruption group that worked for weeks to mobilize against what progressive critics have termed the "Bank Lobbyist Act," called Wednesday's vote "a shameful moment for the Senate" and placed much of the blame on Schumer, who voted against the measure but refused to whip against it.
"The Senate Democrats who joined the GOP to deliver this bank giveaway were as politically short-sighted as they were reckless in putting our economy at risk," Rootstrikers campaign director Kurt Walters said in a statement following the measure's passage. "Can Schumer's Democrats claim to fight for the little guy after deregulating 25 of the country's 40 biggest banks--and making it more likely the little guy's money will be used to give them bailouts?"
While Democratic supporters of the bill continued insisting to the very end it is aimed at providing relief to over-burdened community banks, numerous independent analyses have shown that the legislation's most consequential provisions are aimed at relieving massive banks that received upwards of $40 billion in bailout money during the 2008 financial crisis.
Even Equifax--a large credit-reporting company that suffered an enormous data breach last year and waited six weeks to inform the public--will benefit greatly from the legislation if it is passed in its current form.
"In addition to setting the stage for another taxpayer-funded bailout, this bill reduces safeguards against discriminatory, predatory lending for some of the most vulnerable consumers," Lisa Gilbert, vice president of legislative affairs at Public Citizen, said in a statement.
As consumer groups, former regulators, civil rights organizations, and labor unions denounced the bill's passage on Wednesday, the measure's success did find one welcome audience: the Trump White House.
Having successfully made its way through the Senate after weeks of debate, the largest deregulatory measure since the financial crisis is now headed to the House, where it could be altered--but probably not in favor of consumers, as the House deregulation push has been even more extreme than the Senate's.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) vowed to pick up where his progressive colleagues in the Senate left off by doing everything he can to make sure the bill fails.
"Some of my colleagues may have forgotten about how bad the financial crash was, but I haven't," Ellison wrote. "Analysis by the nonpartisan CBO found this bill increases the likelihood of another taxpayer bailout. I will do everything in my power to fight it in the House."
Democrats had the power to stop a massive big bank giveaway from passing the Senate Wednesday night, but instead they decided--with a "green light" from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y)--to hand the GOP more than enough votes to ram the deregulatory bill through instead, commemorating the tenth anniversary of the 2008 financial crisis by significantly increasing the risk of another one.
"The Senate Democrats who joined the GOP to deliver this bank giveaway were as politically short-sighted as they were reckless in putting our economy at risk."
--Kurt Walters, Rootstrikers
In addition to Sen. Angus King (I-Maine), 16 Democrats joined a unified Republican caucus in approving the so-called "Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act."
Rootstrikers, an anti-corruption group that worked for weeks to mobilize against what progressive critics have termed the "Bank Lobbyist Act," called Wednesday's vote "a shameful moment for the Senate" and placed much of the blame on Schumer, who voted against the measure but refused to whip against it.
"The Senate Democrats who joined the GOP to deliver this bank giveaway were as politically short-sighted as they were reckless in putting our economy at risk," Rootstrikers campaign director Kurt Walters said in a statement following the measure's passage. "Can Schumer's Democrats claim to fight for the little guy after deregulating 25 of the country's 40 biggest banks--and making it more likely the little guy's money will be used to give them bailouts?"
While Democratic supporters of the bill continued insisting to the very end it is aimed at providing relief to over-burdened community banks, numerous independent analyses have shown that the legislation's most consequential provisions are aimed at relieving massive banks that received upwards of $40 billion in bailout money during the 2008 financial crisis.
Even Equifax--a large credit-reporting company that suffered an enormous data breach last year and waited six weeks to inform the public--will benefit greatly from the legislation if it is passed in its current form.
"In addition to setting the stage for another taxpayer-funded bailout, this bill reduces safeguards against discriminatory, predatory lending for some of the most vulnerable consumers," Lisa Gilbert, vice president of legislative affairs at Public Citizen, said in a statement.
As consumer groups, former regulators, civil rights organizations, and labor unions denounced the bill's passage on Wednesday, the measure's success did find one welcome audience: the Trump White House.
Having successfully made its way through the Senate after weeks of debate, the largest deregulatory measure since the financial crisis is now headed to the House, where it could be altered--but probably not in favor of consumers, as the House deregulation push has been even more extreme than the Senate's.
In a tweet following Wednesday's vote, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) vowed to pick up where his progressive colleagues in the Senate left off by doing everything he can to make sure the bill fails.
"Some of my colleagues may have forgotten about how bad the financial crash was, but I haven't," Ellison wrote. "Analysis by the nonpartisan CBO found this bill increases the likelihood of another taxpayer bailout. I will do everything in my power to fight it in the House."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.