SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Environmentalists have protested and launched multiple legal challenges against the Dakota Access Pipeline. (Photo: Peg Hunter/flickr/cc)
As green groups continue to denounce the Trump administration's recently unveiled infrastructure plan as a "scam" that's designed to keep the nation trapped in its "dirty and destructive past," analysts are also warning the proposal will "make it harder for the next big anti-pipeline movement" to launch successful legal challenges to new fossil fuel projects.
"This proposal would trample over Indigenous rights to pave the way for a fossil fuel frenzy, and would even let Big Oil build pipelines through national parks."
-- 350.org
The plan aims to not only fast-track the construction of more pipelines across the U.S., but also to limit "the legal options available to lawyers at environmental groups opposed to new fossil fuel infrastructure" in part by changing "the standard under which a pipeline project could be temporarily halted by a judge," as Dino Gradoni explains in a Washington Post piece published Friday.
Trump also wants Congress to rewrite long-standing environmental laws that allow for lawsuits challenging permits. Gradoni notes that although the administration's desire for that specific revision by lawmakers may be a bit of a "pipe dream," enacting barriers to launching legal challenges against pipeline projects "could be a significant blow to the slew of protesters who spent years agitating against the Keystone XL pipeline and more recently the Dakota Access one."
Additionally, as just the latest development in the Trump administration's long-term pursuit of "American energy dominance" through the exploitation of "vast amounts" of energy reserves on public lands, the infrastructure plan proposes allowing Interior Department Secretary Ryan Zinke to approve the construction of pipelines through national parks. Currently, only acts of Congress can do that.
The environmental group 350.org has launched a campaign to pressure members of Congress to oppose Trump's plan, which they describe as a "climate-wrecking pipeline bonanza." In a drafted letter to senators, the group declares, "This proposal would trample over Indigenous rights to pave the way for a fossil fuel frenzy, and would even let Big Oil build pipelines through national parks."
"And Trump wants to pay for this pipeline bonanza with deep cuts to essential programs like food assistance and Medicaid--a cruel attack on America's most vulnerable communities--and by forcing taxpayers in cash-strapped cities and states to pick up most of the tab. That's unacceptable," the letter continues, calling on Congress to advocate for an infrastructure deal "that creates millions of jobs and helps build the 100 percent renewable energy-powered world we need."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As green groups continue to denounce the Trump administration's recently unveiled infrastructure plan as a "scam" that's designed to keep the nation trapped in its "dirty and destructive past," analysts are also warning the proposal will "make it harder for the next big anti-pipeline movement" to launch successful legal challenges to new fossil fuel projects.
"This proposal would trample over Indigenous rights to pave the way for a fossil fuel frenzy, and would even let Big Oil build pipelines through national parks."
-- 350.org
The plan aims to not only fast-track the construction of more pipelines across the U.S., but also to limit "the legal options available to lawyers at environmental groups opposed to new fossil fuel infrastructure" in part by changing "the standard under which a pipeline project could be temporarily halted by a judge," as Dino Gradoni explains in a Washington Post piece published Friday.
Trump also wants Congress to rewrite long-standing environmental laws that allow for lawsuits challenging permits. Gradoni notes that although the administration's desire for that specific revision by lawmakers may be a bit of a "pipe dream," enacting barriers to launching legal challenges against pipeline projects "could be a significant blow to the slew of protesters who spent years agitating against the Keystone XL pipeline and more recently the Dakota Access one."
Additionally, as just the latest development in the Trump administration's long-term pursuit of "American energy dominance" through the exploitation of "vast amounts" of energy reserves on public lands, the infrastructure plan proposes allowing Interior Department Secretary Ryan Zinke to approve the construction of pipelines through national parks. Currently, only acts of Congress can do that.
The environmental group 350.org has launched a campaign to pressure members of Congress to oppose Trump's plan, which they describe as a "climate-wrecking pipeline bonanza." In a drafted letter to senators, the group declares, "This proposal would trample over Indigenous rights to pave the way for a fossil fuel frenzy, and would even let Big Oil build pipelines through national parks."
"And Trump wants to pay for this pipeline bonanza with deep cuts to essential programs like food assistance and Medicaid--a cruel attack on America's most vulnerable communities--and by forcing taxpayers in cash-strapped cities and states to pick up most of the tab. That's unacceptable," the letter continues, calling on Congress to advocate for an infrastructure deal "that creates millions of jobs and helps build the 100 percent renewable energy-powered world we need."
As green groups continue to denounce the Trump administration's recently unveiled infrastructure plan as a "scam" that's designed to keep the nation trapped in its "dirty and destructive past," analysts are also warning the proposal will "make it harder for the next big anti-pipeline movement" to launch successful legal challenges to new fossil fuel projects.
"This proposal would trample over Indigenous rights to pave the way for a fossil fuel frenzy, and would even let Big Oil build pipelines through national parks."
-- 350.org
The plan aims to not only fast-track the construction of more pipelines across the U.S., but also to limit "the legal options available to lawyers at environmental groups opposed to new fossil fuel infrastructure" in part by changing "the standard under which a pipeline project could be temporarily halted by a judge," as Dino Gradoni explains in a Washington Post piece published Friday.
Trump also wants Congress to rewrite long-standing environmental laws that allow for lawsuits challenging permits. Gradoni notes that although the administration's desire for that specific revision by lawmakers may be a bit of a "pipe dream," enacting barriers to launching legal challenges against pipeline projects "could be a significant blow to the slew of protesters who spent years agitating against the Keystone XL pipeline and more recently the Dakota Access one."
Additionally, as just the latest development in the Trump administration's long-term pursuit of "American energy dominance" through the exploitation of "vast amounts" of energy reserves on public lands, the infrastructure plan proposes allowing Interior Department Secretary Ryan Zinke to approve the construction of pipelines through national parks. Currently, only acts of Congress can do that.
The environmental group 350.org has launched a campaign to pressure members of Congress to oppose Trump's plan, which they describe as a "climate-wrecking pipeline bonanza." In a drafted letter to senators, the group declares, "This proposal would trample over Indigenous rights to pave the way for a fossil fuel frenzy, and would even let Big Oil build pipelines through national parks."
"And Trump wants to pay for this pipeline bonanza with deep cuts to essential programs like food assistance and Medicaid--a cruel attack on America's most vulnerable communities--and by forcing taxpayers in cash-strapped cities and states to pick up most of the tab. That's unacceptable," the letter continues, calling on Congress to advocate for an infrastructure deal "that creates millions of jobs and helps build the 100 percent renewable energy-powered world we need."