

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney testifies before the Senate Budget Committee May 25, 2017 in Washington, D.C.
In yet another indication that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under the leadership of Trump budget chief Mick Mulvaney is no longer devoted to protecting the public from corporate wrongdoing, the agency has reportedly placed its investigation of Equifax "on ice"--a move that says "you're out of luck" to the more than 143 million Americans whose personal information was compromised in a massive security breach last year.
"Equifax's tissue-thin security allowed hackers to steal personal data from more than 140 million Americans, yet Mulvaney appears intent on protecting the company instead of consumers."
--Public Citizen
"This is an absolute outrage," the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen wrote in Twitter in response to the news. "Equifax's tissue-thin security allowed hackers to steal personal data from more than 140 million Americans, yet Mulvaney appears intent on protecting the company instead of consumers."
Highlighting the fact that Mulvaney has received thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Equifax, corporate watchdog Allied Progress decried the CFPB's move as "deeply disturbing."
"This has become par for the course at Mulvaney's CFPB. If you've given him massive campaign contributions, you should expect special treatment," said Allied Progress executive director Karl Frisch in a statement.
First reported by Reuters' Patrick Rucker, the CFPB's decision to pull back from its probe into how the credit reporting giant Equifax failed to protect the data of nearly half of the U.S. population--and then took six weeks to notify the public of the breach--was driven by Mulvaney himself, who President Donald Trump placed in charge of the consumer bureau after former director Richard Cordray resigned in November.
Mulvaney, Rucker notes, "has not ordered subpoenas against Equifax or sought sworn testimony from executives, routine steps when launching a full-scale probe. Meanwhile the CFPB has shelved plans for on-the-ground tests of how Equifax protects data, an idea backed by Cordray."
"The CFPB also recently rebuffed bank regulators at the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency when they offered to help with on-site exams of credit bureaus, said two sources familiar with the matter," Rucker adds.
Mulvaney's move comes as Equifax is facing a flurry of class action lawsuits--more than 240, by its own estimation--as well as investigations from state attorneys general.
Equifax has also faced heat from members of Congress--particularly Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who last September introduced legislation aimed at giving control of credit information back to consumers.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In yet another indication that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under the leadership of Trump budget chief Mick Mulvaney is no longer devoted to protecting the public from corporate wrongdoing, the agency has reportedly placed its investigation of Equifax "on ice"--a move that says "you're out of luck" to the more than 143 million Americans whose personal information was compromised in a massive security breach last year.
"Equifax's tissue-thin security allowed hackers to steal personal data from more than 140 million Americans, yet Mulvaney appears intent on protecting the company instead of consumers."
--Public Citizen
"This is an absolute outrage," the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen wrote in Twitter in response to the news. "Equifax's tissue-thin security allowed hackers to steal personal data from more than 140 million Americans, yet Mulvaney appears intent on protecting the company instead of consumers."
Highlighting the fact that Mulvaney has received thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Equifax, corporate watchdog Allied Progress decried the CFPB's move as "deeply disturbing."
"This has become par for the course at Mulvaney's CFPB. If you've given him massive campaign contributions, you should expect special treatment," said Allied Progress executive director Karl Frisch in a statement.
First reported by Reuters' Patrick Rucker, the CFPB's decision to pull back from its probe into how the credit reporting giant Equifax failed to protect the data of nearly half of the U.S. population--and then took six weeks to notify the public of the breach--was driven by Mulvaney himself, who President Donald Trump placed in charge of the consumer bureau after former director Richard Cordray resigned in November.
Mulvaney, Rucker notes, "has not ordered subpoenas against Equifax or sought sworn testimony from executives, routine steps when launching a full-scale probe. Meanwhile the CFPB has shelved plans for on-the-ground tests of how Equifax protects data, an idea backed by Cordray."
"The CFPB also recently rebuffed bank regulators at the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency when they offered to help with on-site exams of credit bureaus, said two sources familiar with the matter," Rucker adds.
Mulvaney's move comes as Equifax is facing a flurry of class action lawsuits--more than 240, by its own estimation--as well as investigations from state attorneys general.
Equifax has also faced heat from members of Congress--particularly Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who last September introduced legislation aimed at giving control of credit information back to consumers.
In yet another indication that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) under the leadership of Trump budget chief Mick Mulvaney is no longer devoted to protecting the public from corporate wrongdoing, the agency has reportedly placed its investigation of Equifax "on ice"--a move that says "you're out of luck" to the more than 143 million Americans whose personal information was compromised in a massive security breach last year.
"Equifax's tissue-thin security allowed hackers to steal personal data from more than 140 million Americans, yet Mulvaney appears intent on protecting the company instead of consumers."
--Public Citizen
"This is an absolute outrage," the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen wrote in Twitter in response to the news. "Equifax's tissue-thin security allowed hackers to steal personal data from more than 140 million Americans, yet Mulvaney appears intent on protecting the company instead of consumers."
Highlighting the fact that Mulvaney has received thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Equifax, corporate watchdog Allied Progress decried the CFPB's move as "deeply disturbing."
"This has become par for the course at Mulvaney's CFPB. If you've given him massive campaign contributions, you should expect special treatment," said Allied Progress executive director Karl Frisch in a statement.
First reported by Reuters' Patrick Rucker, the CFPB's decision to pull back from its probe into how the credit reporting giant Equifax failed to protect the data of nearly half of the U.S. population--and then took six weeks to notify the public of the breach--was driven by Mulvaney himself, who President Donald Trump placed in charge of the consumer bureau after former director Richard Cordray resigned in November.
Mulvaney, Rucker notes, "has not ordered subpoenas against Equifax or sought sworn testimony from executives, routine steps when launching a full-scale probe. Meanwhile the CFPB has shelved plans for on-the-ground tests of how Equifax protects data, an idea backed by Cordray."
"The CFPB also recently rebuffed bank regulators at the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency when they offered to help with on-site exams of credit bureaus, said two sources familiar with the matter," Rucker adds.
Mulvaney's move comes as Equifax is facing a flurry of class action lawsuits--more than 240, by its own estimation--as well as investigations from state attorneys general.
Equifax has also faced heat from members of Congress--particularly Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who last September introduced legislation aimed at giving control of credit information back to consumers.