SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Since Scott Lloyd was appointed to lead the Office of Refugee Resettlement, the office has tried to prevent at least four women from obtaining abortions. (Photo: Jordan Uhl/Flickr/cc)
'Cruel and Unconstitutional': Trump Official Proposed Experimental Method to Reverse Detained Teen's Abortion
Trump appointee who now heads the Office of Refugee Resettlement discussed reversing the abortion an undocumented teenage girl had fought to obtain
Feb 01, 2018
Officials at the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), including the Trump appointee now in charge of the department, reportedly suggested an experimental method to reverse a medication-induced abortion obtained by a 17-year-old undocumented immigrant in the office's care.
According to a Vice report, current ORR director Scott Lloyd, who has written articles promoting the inclusion of anti-contraceptive efforts in the anti-choice movement, discussed with other administration staff members the use of the hormone progesterone to reverse the abortion after it was underway last March--a method that has not been proven to work, can cause side effects, and has been dismissed by the mainstream medical community as experimentation on women.
The 17-year-old girl, who was in ORR custody after arriving in the U.S. from El Salvador, reported to immigration officials that her pregnancy was the result of rape, and a Texas judge ruled that she should be permitted to have an abortion, challenging the Trump administration's claims that the Health and Human Services Department, which oversees the ORR, does not have to facilitate abortions.
According to a deposition given by Lloyd in the ACLU's lawsuit fighting the Trump administration's efforts to stop undocumented immigrants from seeking abortions, Lloyd told attorneys he and other officials "may have" discussed ways to reverse the girl's procedure.
"The Trump administration's cruel and unconstitutional treatment of young immigrant women knows no bounds," said Brigitte Amiri, the lead attorney in the group's lawsuit. "The administration forced a minor to go to an emergency room for an ultrasound in the middle of a medication abortion, and contemplated trying to 'reverse' the abortion through an unproven method, against the young woman's will."
In medication-induced abortions, patients are required to take two pills, 24 to 48 hours apart.
After taking the first of the two pills in March, the 17-year-old was taken to an emergency room "in order to determine the health status of [teenager] and her unborn child," on orders of then-acting director of the ORR Kenneth Tota. Administration of the second pill was delayed for this purpose, even though the girl herself had sought the procedure.
During the delay, the abortion clinic providing care to the girl received an email from ORR inquiring whether the use of progesterone to reverse an abortion was "widely practiced."
The girl was eventually able to complete the abortion within 48 hours, but the ACLU denounced the delay, caused by the office's attempt to deny her treatment that she had a right to receive.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Officials at the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), including the Trump appointee now in charge of the department, reportedly suggested an experimental method to reverse a medication-induced abortion obtained by a 17-year-old undocumented immigrant in the office's care.
According to a Vice report, current ORR director Scott Lloyd, who has written articles promoting the inclusion of anti-contraceptive efforts in the anti-choice movement, discussed with other administration staff members the use of the hormone progesterone to reverse the abortion after it was underway last March--a method that has not been proven to work, can cause side effects, and has been dismissed by the mainstream medical community as experimentation on women.
The 17-year-old girl, who was in ORR custody after arriving in the U.S. from El Salvador, reported to immigration officials that her pregnancy was the result of rape, and a Texas judge ruled that she should be permitted to have an abortion, challenging the Trump administration's claims that the Health and Human Services Department, which oversees the ORR, does not have to facilitate abortions.
According to a deposition given by Lloyd in the ACLU's lawsuit fighting the Trump administration's efforts to stop undocumented immigrants from seeking abortions, Lloyd told attorneys he and other officials "may have" discussed ways to reverse the girl's procedure.
"The Trump administration's cruel and unconstitutional treatment of young immigrant women knows no bounds," said Brigitte Amiri, the lead attorney in the group's lawsuit. "The administration forced a minor to go to an emergency room for an ultrasound in the middle of a medication abortion, and contemplated trying to 'reverse' the abortion through an unproven method, against the young woman's will."
In medication-induced abortions, patients are required to take two pills, 24 to 48 hours apart.
After taking the first of the two pills in March, the 17-year-old was taken to an emergency room "in order to determine the health status of [teenager] and her unborn child," on orders of then-acting director of the ORR Kenneth Tota. Administration of the second pill was delayed for this purpose, even though the girl herself had sought the procedure.
During the delay, the abortion clinic providing care to the girl received an email from ORR inquiring whether the use of progesterone to reverse an abortion was "widely practiced."
The girl was eventually able to complete the abortion within 48 hours, but the ACLU denounced the delay, caused by the office's attempt to deny her treatment that she had a right to receive.
Officials at the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), including the Trump appointee now in charge of the department, reportedly suggested an experimental method to reverse a medication-induced abortion obtained by a 17-year-old undocumented immigrant in the office's care.
According to a Vice report, current ORR director Scott Lloyd, who has written articles promoting the inclusion of anti-contraceptive efforts in the anti-choice movement, discussed with other administration staff members the use of the hormone progesterone to reverse the abortion after it was underway last March--a method that has not been proven to work, can cause side effects, and has been dismissed by the mainstream medical community as experimentation on women.
The 17-year-old girl, who was in ORR custody after arriving in the U.S. from El Salvador, reported to immigration officials that her pregnancy was the result of rape, and a Texas judge ruled that she should be permitted to have an abortion, challenging the Trump administration's claims that the Health and Human Services Department, which oversees the ORR, does not have to facilitate abortions.
According to a deposition given by Lloyd in the ACLU's lawsuit fighting the Trump administration's efforts to stop undocumented immigrants from seeking abortions, Lloyd told attorneys he and other officials "may have" discussed ways to reverse the girl's procedure.
"The Trump administration's cruel and unconstitutional treatment of young immigrant women knows no bounds," said Brigitte Amiri, the lead attorney in the group's lawsuit. "The administration forced a minor to go to an emergency room for an ultrasound in the middle of a medication abortion, and contemplated trying to 'reverse' the abortion through an unproven method, against the young woman's will."
In medication-induced abortions, patients are required to take two pills, 24 to 48 hours apart.
After taking the first of the two pills in March, the 17-year-old was taken to an emergency room "in order to determine the health status of [teenager] and her unborn child," on orders of then-acting director of the ORR Kenneth Tota. Administration of the second pill was delayed for this purpose, even though the girl herself had sought the procedure.
During the delay, the abortion clinic providing care to the girl received an email from ORR inquiring whether the use of progesterone to reverse an abortion was "widely practiced."
The girl was eventually able to complete the abortion within 48 hours, but the ACLU denounced the delay, caused by the office's attempt to deny her treatment that she had a right to receive.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.