SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"This revelation shows us just how close we were, and still are, to a true constitutional crisis that could threaten our democracy," argued Noah Bookbinder of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington. (Photo: Alex Wong)
Reports Confirm Trump Not Only Considered, But Actually Crossed 'Red Line' By Trying to Fire Mueller
"A president firing the person tasked with investigating him would look alarmingly like a step toward authoritarianism."
Jan 26, 2018
For months, President Donald Trump has fervently denied every suggestion that he has considered firing special counsel Robert Mueller, but a new report on Thursday revealed that Trump hasn't merely pondered firing Mueller--he actually ordered the termination last June, only to back down after chief White House lawyer Donald McGahn threatened to quit rather than comply.
"This revelation shows us just how close we were, and still are, to a true constitutional crisis that could threaten our democracy."
--Noah Bookbinder, CREW
According to the New York Times, Trump first told McGahn over the summer to ask the Justice Department--headed by Trump appointee and loyalist Attorney General Jeff Sessions--to dismiss Mueller "amid the first wave of news media reports" suggesting that the special counsel is compiling a possible obstruction of justice case against the president.
Trump reportedly suggested that Mueller should be fired over "conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation," the Times notes, including an alleged "dispute" in 2011 that caused Mueller to cancel his membership at Trump's Virginia golf club. (McGahn didn't buy Trump's case.)
While multiple outlets confirmed the Times' original scoop on the president's order, Trump on Friday denied it publicly.
Ethics experts and activists who have warned for months that Trump is getting closer to firing Mueller--particularly as he begins to probe Trump's sprawling business empire--seized upon Thursday's report as further proof of "just how close we were, and still are, to a true constitutional crisis."
Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti argued in response to the Times report that Trump's order to fire Mueller will greatly bolster any obstruction of justice case against the president.
"The fact that Trump came up with his own excuses to fire Mueller suggests that he knew that firing Mueller in order to end the Russia investigation was unlawful but he wanted to fire him anyway," Mariotti wrote on Twitter late Thursday. "That's really powerful evidence for Mueller."
As Common Dreams has reported, activist groups have planned a mass, nationwide protest in the case that Trump succeeds in firing Mueller.
Ben Wikler, Washington director of MoveOn.org--one of the many groups that has participated in planning the mobilization--reiterated the importance of taking to the streets if the special counsel is ousted.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
For months, President Donald Trump has fervently denied every suggestion that he has considered firing special counsel Robert Mueller, but a new report on Thursday revealed that Trump hasn't merely pondered firing Mueller--he actually ordered the termination last June, only to back down after chief White House lawyer Donald McGahn threatened to quit rather than comply.
"This revelation shows us just how close we were, and still are, to a true constitutional crisis that could threaten our democracy."
--Noah Bookbinder, CREW
According to the New York Times, Trump first told McGahn over the summer to ask the Justice Department--headed by Trump appointee and loyalist Attorney General Jeff Sessions--to dismiss Mueller "amid the first wave of news media reports" suggesting that the special counsel is compiling a possible obstruction of justice case against the president.
Trump reportedly suggested that Mueller should be fired over "conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation," the Times notes, including an alleged "dispute" in 2011 that caused Mueller to cancel his membership at Trump's Virginia golf club. (McGahn didn't buy Trump's case.)
While multiple outlets confirmed the Times' original scoop on the president's order, Trump on Friday denied it publicly.
Ethics experts and activists who have warned for months that Trump is getting closer to firing Mueller--particularly as he begins to probe Trump's sprawling business empire--seized upon Thursday's report as further proof of "just how close we were, and still are, to a true constitutional crisis."
Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti argued in response to the Times report that Trump's order to fire Mueller will greatly bolster any obstruction of justice case against the president.
"The fact that Trump came up with his own excuses to fire Mueller suggests that he knew that firing Mueller in order to end the Russia investigation was unlawful but he wanted to fire him anyway," Mariotti wrote on Twitter late Thursday. "That's really powerful evidence for Mueller."
As Common Dreams has reported, activist groups have planned a mass, nationwide protest in the case that Trump succeeds in firing Mueller.
Ben Wikler, Washington director of MoveOn.org--one of the many groups that has participated in planning the mobilization--reiterated the importance of taking to the streets if the special counsel is ousted.
For months, President Donald Trump has fervently denied every suggestion that he has considered firing special counsel Robert Mueller, but a new report on Thursday revealed that Trump hasn't merely pondered firing Mueller--he actually ordered the termination last June, only to back down after chief White House lawyer Donald McGahn threatened to quit rather than comply.
"This revelation shows us just how close we were, and still are, to a true constitutional crisis that could threaten our democracy."
--Noah Bookbinder, CREW
According to the New York Times, Trump first told McGahn over the summer to ask the Justice Department--headed by Trump appointee and loyalist Attorney General Jeff Sessions--to dismiss Mueller "amid the first wave of news media reports" suggesting that the special counsel is compiling a possible obstruction of justice case against the president.
Trump reportedly suggested that Mueller should be fired over "conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation," the Times notes, including an alleged "dispute" in 2011 that caused Mueller to cancel his membership at Trump's Virginia golf club. (McGahn didn't buy Trump's case.)
While multiple outlets confirmed the Times' original scoop on the president's order, Trump on Friday denied it publicly.
Ethics experts and activists who have warned for months that Trump is getting closer to firing Mueller--particularly as he begins to probe Trump's sprawling business empire--seized upon Thursday's report as further proof of "just how close we were, and still are, to a true constitutional crisis."
Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti argued in response to the Times report that Trump's order to fire Mueller will greatly bolster any obstruction of justice case against the president.
"The fact that Trump came up with his own excuses to fire Mueller suggests that he knew that firing Mueller in order to end the Russia investigation was unlawful but he wanted to fire him anyway," Mariotti wrote on Twitter late Thursday. "That's really powerful evidence for Mueller."
As Common Dreams has reported, activist groups have planned a mass, nationwide protest in the case that Trump succeeds in firing Mueller.
Ben Wikler, Washington director of MoveOn.org--one of the many groups that has participated in planning the mobilization--reiterated the importance of taking to the streets if the special counsel is ousted.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.