SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A new policy draft from the Pentagon suggests the use of nuclear weapons by the U.S. in the event of non-nuclear attacks--a huge departure from decades of nuclear policy. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Pentagon Rebuked for Draft Suggesting Nuclear Response to Cyber Attacks
With new nuclear policy draft, the Pentagon is "winding the Doomsday Clock in the wrong direction."
Jan 17, 2018
Anti-nuclear advocates on Wednesday denounced a draft Pentagon report pushing the use of nuclear weapons by the United States to respond to non-nuclear attacks--a major departure from the policy that's been in place for decades.
The draft Nuclear Posture Review expands the definition of the "extreme circumstances" in which the U.S. could use nuclear force, notably suggesting that such weapons could be used in the event of cyber attacks.
"Common sense must prevail, and the U.S. must move to a world where the use of nuclear weapons is less likely, not more likely," said Beatrice Fihn, executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), in a statement.
"There is something seriously wrong with an administration who thinks the unilateral power for one person to end the world is somehow not enough power."--Beatrice Fihn, ICAN
"They are winding the Doomsday Clock in the wrong direction," she added, referring to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' symbolic measure of humanity's proximity to nuclear catastrophe.
The draft was released after months of escalating tensions between the U.S. and North Korea over the latter's reported nuclear activities. Amid calls from nuclear policy experts to bring Kim Jong-un's government to the negotiating table, President Donald Trump has responded to reports of nuclear tests by North Korea by threatening to "totally destroy" the country of 25 million people, while taunting Kim on social media.
While the U.S. and Russia hold about 93 percent of the world's nuclear weapons, according to the Ploughshares Fund, Trump has repeatedly attacked previous administrations for allowing North Korea to proliferate nuclear weapons at all.
Meanwhile, the Nuclear Posture Review draft suggests that the U.S. is searching for ways to increase its already-significant advantage over the small, isolated country.
"These new leaks from the Pentagon show they are trying to make it easier for Donald Trump to use nuclear weapons," said Fihn. "Does anybody seriously think it was not easy enough already? There is something seriously wrong with an administration who thinks the unilateral power for one person to end the world is somehow not enough power."
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Anti-nuclear advocates on Wednesday denounced a draft Pentagon report pushing the use of nuclear weapons by the United States to respond to non-nuclear attacks--a major departure from the policy that's been in place for decades.
The draft Nuclear Posture Review expands the definition of the "extreme circumstances" in which the U.S. could use nuclear force, notably suggesting that such weapons could be used in the event of cyber attacks.
"Common sense must prevail, and the U.S. must move to a world where the use of nuclear weapons is less likely, not more likely," said Beatrice Fihn, executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), in a statement.
"There is something seriously wrong with an administration who thinks the unilateral power for one person to end the world is somehow not enough power."--Beatrice Fihn, ICAN
"They are winding the Doomsday Clock in the wrong direction," she added, referring to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' symbolic measure of humanity's proximity to nuclear catastrophe.
The draft was released after months of escalating tensions between the U.S. and North Korea over the latter's reported nuclear activities. Amid calls from nuclear policy experts to bring Kim Jong-un's government to the negotiating table, President Donald Trump has responded to reports of nuclear tests by North Korea by threatening to "totally destroy" the country of 25 million people, while taunting Kim on social media.
While the U.S. and Russia hold about 93 percent of the world's nuclear weapons, according to the Ploughshares Fund, Trump has repeatedly attacked previous administrations for allowing North Korea to proliferate nuclear weapons at all.
Meanwhile, the Nuclear Posture Review draft suggests that the U.S. is searching for ways to increase its already-significant advantage over the small, isolated country.
"These new leaks from the Pentagon show they are trying to make it easier for Donald Trump to use nuclear weapons," said Fihn. "Does anybody seriously think it was not easy enough already? There is something seriously wrong with an administration who thinks the unilateral power for one person to end the world is somehow not enough power."
Anti-nuclear advocates on Wednesday denounced a draft Pentagon report pushing the use of nuclear weapons by the United States to respond to non-nuclear attacks--a major departure from the policy that's been in place for decades.
The draft Nuclear Posture Review expands the definition of the "extreme circumstances" in which the U.S. could use nuclear force, notably suggesting that such weapons could be used in the event of cyber attacks.
"Common sense must prevail, and the U.S. must move to a world where the use of nuclear weapons is less likely, not more likely," said Beatrice Fihn, executive director of the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), in a statement.
"There is something seriously wrong with an administration who thinks the unilateral power for one person to end the world is somehow not enough power."--Beatrice Fihn, ICAN
"They are winding the Doomsday Clock in the wrong direction," she added, referring to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' symbolic measure of humanity's proximity to nuclear catastrophe.
The draft was released after months of escalating tensions between the U.S. and North Korea over the latter's reported nuclear activities. Amid calls from nuclear policy experts to bring Kim Jong-un's government to the negotiating table, President Donald Trump has responded to reports of nuclear tests by North Korea by threatening to "totally destroy" the country of 25 million people, while taunting Kim on social media.
While the U.S. and Russia hold about 93 percent of the world's nuclear weapons, according to the Ploughshares Fund, Trump has repeatedly attacked previous administrations for allowing North Korea to proliferate nuclear weapons at all.
Meanwhile, the Nuclear Posture Review draft suggests that the U.S. is searching for ways to increase its already-significant advantage over the small, isolated country.
"These new leaks from the Pentagon show they are trying to make it easier for Donald Trump to use nuclear weapons," said Fihn. "Does anybody seriously think it was not easy enough already? There is something seriously wrong with an administration who thinks the unilateral power for one person to end the world is somehow not enough power."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.