

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

At a protest at the American Embassy in London last February, a demonstrator held a sign denouncing arms exports from countries including the U.S. and the U.K. to Saudi Arabia, which has waged war in Yemen for nearly three years. (Photo: Alisdare Hickson/Flickr/cc)
Accusing the Trump administration of putting the U.S. economy over global human rights, critics on Monday denounced the White House's plan to loosen restrictions on arms sales and enlist diplomats to help push American-made weapons to foreign governments.
Human rights advocates expressed concern that more weapons sales could fuel further violence around the world.
"As the world's biggest arms exporter, the U.S. has a special responsibility to ensure no U.S. weapons fall into the wrong hands," Patrick Wilcken, an arms control researcher for Amnesty International told Newsweek. "Time and again we have seen U.S. supplied weaponry going astray and ending up in the hands of armed groups, or being supplied to States with poor human rights records which misuse them."
"Arms are not an ordinary commodity and should not be treated as such," added Jeff Abramson, senior fellow at the Arms Control Association.
A senior administration official told Reuters that under the new plan, military and commercial attaches and diplomats will ideally be "unfettered to be salesmen for this stuff, to be promoters."
The U.S. racked up $42 billion in arms sales in 2017. And now the president appears eager to use increased military exports, including fighter jets, drones, and artillery--no matter the consequences around the world.
"This administration has demonstrated from the very beginning that human rights have taken a back seat to economic concerns," Rachel Stohl, director of the conventional defense program at the Stimson Center, a nonpartisan think tank, told Reuters. "And the short-sightedness of a new arms export policy could have serious long-term implications."
The Trump administration has already been criticized by human rights groups as well as U.S. lawmakers for its support of Saudi Arabia's airstrikes against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, which has left the impoverished country reeling from thousands of civilian deaths, a cholera outbreak, and famine.
Last year, the Saudis told Trump they would buy more than $100 billion of arms including $7 billion of precision-guided munitions. The deal drew ire from critics as the weapons have been linked to civilian deaths in Yemen.
"As he did in his first international trip as President, when he announced a notional $110 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia, Trump is couching arms sales in terms of jobs and the economy," Abramson told Newsweek of Trump's latest plan to expand sales. "Much better would be for Trump to promote the portion of U.S. conventional arms transfer policy that includes the goal of 'ensuring that arms transfers do not contribute to human rights violations or violations of international humanitarian law.'
Contrasting with the Trump administration's expected proposal, Norway last week announced it would end all weapons exports to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), part of the Saudi coalition fighting in Yemen, to curb its support of the carnage.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Accusing the Trump administration of putting the U.S. economy over global human rights, critics on Monday denounced the White House's plan to loosen restrictions on arms sales and enlist diplomats to help push American-made weapons to foreign governments.
Human rights advocates expressed concern that more weapons sales could fuel further violence around the world.
"As the world's biggest arms exporter, the U.S. has a special responsibility to ensure no U.S. weapons fall into the wrong hands," Patrick Wilcken, an arms control researcher for Amnesty International told Newsweek. "Time and again we have seen U.S. supplied weaponry going astray and ending up in the hands of armed groups, or being supplied to States with poor human rights records which misuse them."
"Arms are not an ordinary commodity and should not be treated as such," added Jeff Abramson, senior fellow at the Arms Control Association.
A senior administration official told Reuters that under the new plan, military and commercial attaches and diplomats will ideally be "unfettered to be salesmen for this stuff, to be promoters."
The U.S. racked up $42 billion in arms sales in 2017. And now the president appears eager to use increased military exports, including fighter jets, drones, and artillery--no matter the consequences around the world.
"This administration has demonstrated from the very beginning that human rights have taken a back seat to economic concerns," Rachel Stohl, director of the conventional defense program at the Stimson Center, a nonpartisan think tank, told Reuters. "And the short-sightedness of a new arms export policy could have serious long-term implications."
The Trump administration has already been criticized by human rights groups as well as U.S. lawmakers for its support of Saudi Arabia's airstrikes against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, which has left the impoverished country reeling from thousands of civilian deaths, a cholera outbreak, and famine.
Last year, the Saudis told Trump they would buy more than $100 billion of arms including $7 billion of precision-guided munitions. The deal drew ire from critics as the weapons have been linked to civilian deaths in Yemen.
"As he did in his first international trip as President, when he announced a notional $110 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia, Trump is couching arms sales in terms of jobs and the economy," Abramson told Newsweek of Trump's latest plan to expand sales. "Much better would be for Trump to promote the portion of U.S. conventional arms transfer policy that includes the goal of 'ensuring that arms transfers do not contribute to human rights violations or violations of international humanitarian law.'
Contrasting with the Trump administration's expected proposal, Norway last week announced it would end all weapons exports to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), part of the Saudi coalition fighting in Yemen, to curb its support of the carnage.
Accusing the Trump administration of putting the U.S. economy over global human rights, critics on Monday denounced the White House's plan to loosen restrictions on arms sales and enlist diplomats to help push American-made weapons to foreign governments.
Human rights advocates expressed concern that more weapons sales could fuel further violence around the world.
"As the world's biggest arms exporter, the U.S. has a special responsibility to ensure no U.S. weapons fall into the wrong hands," Patrick Wilcken, an arms control researcher for Amnesty International told Newsweek. "Time and again we have seen U.S. supplied weaponry going astray and ending up in the hands of armed groups, or being supplied to States with poor human rights records which misuse them."
"Arms are not an ordinary commodity and should not be treated as such," added Jeff Abramson, senior fellow at the Arms Control Association.
A senior administration official told Reuters that under the new plan, military and commercial attaches and diplomats will ideally be "unfettered to be salesmen for this stuff, to be promoters."
The U.S. racked up $42 billion in arms sales in 2017. And now the president appears eager to use increased military exports, including fighter jets, drones, and artillery--no matter the consequences around the world.
"This administration has demonstrated from the very beginning that human rights have taken a back seat to economic concerns," Rachel Stohl, director of the conventional defense program at the Stimson Center, a nonpartisan think tank, told Reuters. "And the short-sightedness of a new arms export policy could have serious long-term implications."
The Trump administration has already been criticized by human rights groups as well as U.S. lawmakers for its support of Saudi Arabia's airstrikes against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, which has left the impoverished country reeling from thousands of civilian deaths, a cholera outbreak, and famine.
Last year, the Saudis told Trump they would buy more than $100 billion of arms including $7 billion of precision-guided munitions. The deal drew ire from critics as the weapons have been linked to civilian deaths in Yemen.
"As he did in his first international trip as President, when he announced a notional $110 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia, Trump is couching arms sales in terms of jobs and the economy," Abramson told Newsweek of Trump's latest plan to expand sales. "Much better would be for Trump to promote the portion of U.S. conventional arms transfer policy that includes the goal of 'ensuring that arms transfers do not contribute to human rights violations or violations of international humanitarian law.'
Contrasting with the Trump administration's expected proposal, Norway last week announced it would end all weapons exports to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), part of the Saudi coalition fighting in Yemen, to curb its support of the carnage.