U.S. President Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions attend a panel discussion on an opioid and drug abuse in the Roosevelt Room of the White House March 29, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images)
Dec 29, 2017
In an interview with a New York Times reporter on Thursday, President Donald Trump claimed from the comforts of his Florida golf club that he has the "absolute right" to do what he wants with the Department of Justice (DOJ)--a remark critics characterized as a "veiled threat" against special counsel Robert Mueller and "the type of statement authoritarian leaders make."
"'Absolute right' to direct DOJ? Absolutism is for monarchs and dictators--not rule of law systems."
--Norm Eisen, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington
Referring to Mueller's investigation of possible collusion between Trump's 2016 campaign and the Russian government, the president went on to say that he has "stayed uninvolved with this particular matter" because he believes he is "going to be treated fairly."
While Trump didn't articulate a definition of "fair," he has previously attempted to set limits on what he believes is and isn't off limits for Mueller's probe. During an interview with the Times in July, Trump claimed that any attempt by the special counsel to investigate his or his family's finances would constitute a "violation."
Mueller has since plowed through the president's so-called "red line," sparking concerns that Trump could be planning to fire him in the coming weeks. So far, Mueller has brought charges against four people connected with Trump, including his former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
As Common Dreams has reported, more than 100,000 Americans have vowed to take to the streets across the U.S. if Trump fires Mueller.
Trump's interview on Thursday sparked fresh worries that the president will attempt to subvert Mueller's Russia probe if he feels that the special counsel is getting too close to him or his inner circle. In particular, Trump's assertion that he has the right to interfere with an independent investigation demonstrates the president's "chilling" disregard for the rule of law, critics said.
"'Absolute right' to direct DOJ? Absolutism is for monarchs and dictators--not rule of law systems," wrote Norm Eisen of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, a sentiment echoed by numerous analysts in response to Trump's impromptu interview.
\u201cTrump said this, as if the rule of the law and the Constitution did not exist:\n\u201cI have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department.\u201d\n\nhttps://t.co/LsNZVvPjP5\u201d— Steven Greenhouse (@Steven Greenhouse) 1514516903
\u201cThis quote begs the question: If there comes a time when Trump feels like he isn't being "treated fairly" by Mueller, can he use this "absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department" and fire Mueller? (WH has repeatedly denied there are plans to fire Mueller.) https://t.co/PVs8bRiTzY\u201d— Marshall Cohen (@Marshall Cohen) 1514554689
\u201cTrump: \u201cI have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department ... for purposes of hopefully thinking I\u2019m going to be treated fairly, I\u2019ve stayed uninvolved with this particular matter.\u201d\n\nSounds like a veiled threat to shut down Mueller if he brings charges. https://t.co/VJEfzkMwPE\u201d— Renato Mariotti (@Renato Mariotti) 1514514549
\u201cThe key quote in Trump's new @nytimes interview is not his claim Mueller will treat him fairly. By "fair," Trump only means, "conclude what I want him to conclude."\n\nMore important: Trump's claim that his control over Justice Department is "absolute":\n\nhttps://t.co/hmLQQ4TteG\u201d— Greg Sargent (@Greg Sargent) 1514551591
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In an interview with a New York Times reporter on Thursday, President Donald Trump claimed from the comforts of his Florida golf club that he has the "absolute right" to do what he wants with the Department of Justice (DOJ)--a remark critics characterized as a "veiled threat" against special counsel Robert Mueller and "the type of statement authoritarian leaders make."
"'Absolute right' to direct DOJ? Absolutism is for monarchs and dictators--not rule of law systems."
--Norm Eisen, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington
Referring to Mueller's investigation of possible collusion between Trump's 2016 campaign and the Russian government, the president went on to say that he has "stayed uninvolved with this particular matter" because he believes he is "going to be treated fairly."
While Trump didn't articulate a definition of "fair," he has previously attempted to set limits on what he believes is and isn't off limits for Mueller's probe. During an interview with the Times in July, Trump claimed that any attempt by the special counsel to investigate his or his family's finances would constitute a "violation."
Mueller has since plowed through the president's so-called "red line," sparking concerns that Trump could be planning to fire him in the coming weeks. So far, Mueller has brought charges against four people connected with Trump, including his former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
As Common Dreams has reported, more than 100,000 Americans have vowed to take to the streets across the U.S. if Trump fires Mueller.
Trump's interview on Thursday sparked fresh worries that the president will attempt to subvert Mueller's Russia probe if he feels that the special counsel is getting too close to him or his inner circle. In particular, Trump's assertion that he has the right to interfere with an independent investigation demonstrates the president's "chilling" disregard for the rule of law, critics said.
"'Absolute right' to direct DOJ? Absolutism is for monarchs and dictators--not rule of law systems," wrote Norm Eisen of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, a sentiment echoed by numerous analysts in response to Trump's impromptu interview.
\u201cTrump said this, as if the rule of the law and the Constitution did not exist:\n\u201cI have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department.\u201d\n\nhttps://t.co/LsNZVvPjP5\u201d— Steven Greenhouse (@Steven Greenhouse) 1514516903
\u201cThis quote begs the question: If there comes a time when Trump feels like he isn't being "treated fairly" by Mueller, can he use this "absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department" and fire Mueller? (WH has repeatedly denied there are plans to fire Mueller.) https://t.co/PVs8bRiTzY\u201d— Marshall Cohen (@Marshall Cohen) 1514554689
\u201cTrump: \u201cI have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department ... for purposes of hopefully thinking I\u2019m going to be treated fairly, I\u2019ve stayed uninvolved with this particular matter.\u201d\n\nSounds like a veiled threat to shut down Mueller if he brings charges. https://t.co/VJEfzkMwPE\u201d— Renato Mariotti (@Renato Mariotti) 1514514549
\u201cThe key quote in Trump's new @nytimes interview is not his claim Mueller will treat him fairly. By "fair," Trump only means, "conclude what I want him to conclude."\n\nMore important: Trump's claim that his control over Justice Department is "absolute":\n\nhttps://t.co/hmLQQ4TteG\u201d— Greg Sargent (@Greg Sargent) 1514551591
In an interview with a New York Times reporter on Thursday, President Donald Trump claimed from the comforts of his Florida golf club that he has the "absolute right" to do what he wants with the Department of Justice (DOJ)--a remark critics characterized as a "veiled threat" against special counsel Robert Mueller and "the type of statement authoritarian leaders make."
"'Absolute right' to direct DOJ? Absolutism is for monarchs and dictators--not rule of law systems."
--Norm Eisen, Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington
Referring to Mueller's investigation of possible collusion between Trump's 2016 campaign and the Russian government, the president went on to say that he has "stayed uninvolved with this particular matter" because he believes he is "going to be treated fairly."
While Trump didn't articulate a definition of "fair," he has previously attempted to set limits on what he believes is and isn't off limits for Mueller's probe. During an interview with the Times in July, Trump claimed that any attempt by the special counsel to investigate his or his family's finances would constitute a "violation."
Mueller has since plowed through the president's so-called "red line," sparking concerns that Trump could be planning to fire him in the coming weeks. So far, Mueller has brought charges against four people connected with Trump, including his former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
As Common Dreams has reported, more than 100,000 Americans have vowed to take to the streets across the U.S. if Trump fires Mueller.
Trump's interview on Thursday sparked fresh worries that the president will attempt to subvert Mueller's Russia probe if he feels that the special counsel is getting too close to him or his inner circle. In particular, Trump's assertion that he has the right to interfere with an independent investigation demonstrates the president's "chilling" disregard for the rule of law, critics said.
"'Absolute right' to direct DOJ? Absolutism is for monarchs and dictators--not rule of law systems," wrote Norm Eisen of Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, a sentiment echoed by numerous analysts in response to Trump's impromptu interview.
\u201cTrump said this, as if the rule of the law and the Constitution did not exist:\n\u201cI have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department.\u201d\n\nhttps://t.co/LsNZVvPjP5\u201d— Steven Greenhouse (@Steven Greenhouse) 1514516903
\u201cThis quote begs the question: If there comes a time when Trump feels like he isn't being "treated fairly" by Mueller, can he use this "absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department" and fire Mueller? (WH has repeatedly denied there are plans to fire Mueller.) https://t.co/PVs8bRiTzY\u201d— Marshall Cohen (@Marshall Cohen) 1514554689
\u201cTrump: \u201cI have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department ... for purposes of hopefully thinking I\u2019m going to be treated fairly, I\u2019ve stayed uninvolved with this particular matter.\u201d\n\nSounds like a veiled threat to shut down Mueller if he brings charges. https://t.co/VJEfzkMwPE\u201d— Renato Mariotti (@Renato Mariotti) 1514514549
\u201cThe key quote in Trump's new @nytimes interview is not his claim Mueller will treat him fairly. By "fair," Trump only means, "conclude what I want him to conclude."\n\nMore important: Trump's claim that his control over Justice Department is "absolute":\n\nhttps://t.co/hmLQQ4TteG\u201d— Greg Sargent (@Greg Sargent) 1514551591
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.