SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"If you share my concerns, I hope you will consider contacting your members of Congress to let them know that you support an internet that is free, fair, open, and accessible by everyone," Swanson wrote. (Photo: @LiberalResist/Twitter)
Minnesota Moves to Sue FCC as Outrage Against Net Neutrality Repeal Soars
"Net neutrality is essential for consumers and an informed electorate," Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson wrote in an email. "This isn't just a consumer protection issue—it's a democracy protection issue too."
Dec 27, 2017
Joining the large coalition of states and advocacy groups preparing to take legal action against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over its newly passed net neutrality repeal plan, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson announced in an email to supporters on Tuesday that she will take part in a multistate suit against the Republican-controlled agency in an effort to "overturn" its attack on the open internet.
"Without net neutrality, mega corporations can dominate the content people see online by paying money to obtain faster speeds."
--Lori Swanson, Minnesota Attorney General
"Net neutrality is essential for consumers and an informed electorate," Swanson wrote. "Without net neutrality, broadband companies are free to block content they don't want you to see, to slow it down and make it harder to access, or to prioritize content based on who pays them money. This will make it more difficult and more expensive for consumers to access the content they want."
Swanson went on to link corporate-backed efforts to roll back net neutrality protections to corporate mergers that are rapidly consolidating sources of news and information into the hands of a few large companies.
"This isn't just a consumer protection issue--it's a democracy protection issue too," Swanson wrote.
Eliminating net neutrality, Swanson observes, would tighten major corporations' stranglehold on information and allow them to "control what content to make prominent or to obscure, including by promoting sites they own or favor. This will influence the information to which voters and the public have access and will impact elections."
"Congress might try to pass a law next year to cement the FCC's repeal of net neutrality," Swanson's email concluded. "If you share my concerns, I hope you will consider contacting your members of Congress to let them know that you support an internet that is free, fair, open, and accessible by everyone."
According to numbers compiled by Battle for the Net, Americans are doing precisely that. Since FCC chair Ajit Pai's plan to kill net neutrality was unveiled just before Thanksgiving, more than 1.3 million calls have been placed to members of Congress, demanding that they voice support for net neutrality and overrule the FCC's decision using the Congressional Review Act. (Battle for the Net has also set up a "scoreboard" for Americans to track their representatives' position on neutrality.)
Public opposition to the FCC's vote has also been reflected in new polls and an upsurge in consumer complaints.
A Huffington Post/YouGov survey published over the weekend found that only 20 percent of Americans who are aware of the concept of net neutrality support Pai's plan, while 57 percent oppose it.
And as Axios reported on Tuesday, consumers filed more than 2,000 complaints through the FCC's Consumer Complaint Center in December, up from just 157 in October.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Joining the large coalition of states and advocacy groups preparing to take legal action against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over its newly passed net neutrality repeal plan, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson announced in an email to supporters on Tuesday that she will take part in a multistate suit against the Republican-controlled agency in an effort to "overturn" its attack on the open internet.
"Without net neutrality, mega corporations can dominate the content people see online by paying money to obtain faster speeds."
--Lori Swanson, Minnesota Attorney General
"Net neutrality is essential for consumers and an informed electorate," Swanson wrote. "Without net neutrality, broadband companies are free to block content they don't want you to see, to slow it down and make it harder to access, or to prioritize content based on who pays them money. This will make it more difficult and more expensive for consumers to access the content they want."
Swanson went on to link corporate-backed efforts to roll back net neutrality protections to corporate mergers that are rapidly consolidating sources of news and information into the hands of a few large companies.
"This isn't just a consumer protection issue--it's a democracy protection issue too," Swanson wrote.
Eliminating net neutrality, Swanson observes, would tighten major corporations' stranglehold on information and allow them to "control what content to make prominent or to obscure, including by promoting sites they own or favor. This will influence the information to which voters and the public have access and will impact elections."
"Congress might try to pass a law next year to cement the FCC's repeal of net neutrality," Swanson's email concluded. "If you share my concerns, I hope you will consider contacting your members of Congress to let them know that you support an internet that is free, fair, open, and accessible by everyone."
According to numbers compiled by Battle for the Net, Americans are doing precisely that. Since FCC chair Ajit Pai's plan to kill net neutrality was unveiled just before Thanksgiving, more than 1.3 million calls have been placed to members of Congress, demanding that they voice support for net neutrality and overrule the FCC's decision using the Congressional Review Act. (Battle for the Net has also set up a "scoreboard" for Americans to track their representatives' position on neutrality.)
Public opposition to the FCC's vote has also been reflected in new polls and an upsurge in consumer complaints.
A Huffington Post/YouGov survey published over the weekend found that only 20 percent of Americans who are aware of the concept of net neutrality support Pai's plan, while 57 percent oppose it.
And as Axios reported on Tuesday, consumers filed more than 2,000 complaints through the FCC's Consumer Complaint Center in December, up from just 157 in October.
Joining the large coalition of states and advocacy groups preparing to take legal action against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over its newly passed net neutrality repeal plan, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson announced in an email to supporters on Tuesday that she will take part in a multistate suit against the Republican-controlled agency in an effort to "overturn" its attack on the open internet.
"Without net neutrality, mega corporations can dominate the content people see online by paying money to obtain faster speeds."
--Lori Swanson, Minnesota Attorney General
"Net neutrality is essential for consumers and an informed electorate," Swanson wrote. "Without net neutrality, broadband companies are free to block content they don't want you to see, to slow it down and make it harder to access, or to prioritize content based on who pays them money. This will make it more difficult and more expensive for consumers to access the content they want."
Swanson went on to link corporate-backed efforts to roll back net neutrality protections to corporate mergers that are rapidly consolidating sources of news and information into the hands of a few large companies.
"This isn't just a consumer protection issue--it's a democracy protection issue too," Swanson wrote.
Eliminating net neutrality, Swanson observes, would tighten major corporations' stranglehold on information and allow them to "control what content to make prominent or to obscure, including by promoting sites they own or favor. This will influence the information to which voters and the public have access and will impact elections."
"Congress might try to pass a law next year to cement the FCC's repeal of net neutrality," Swanson's email concluded. "If you share my concerns, I hope you will consider contacting your members of Congress to let them know that you support an internet that is free, fair, open, and accessible by everyone."
According to numbers compiled by Battle for the Net, Americans are doing precisely that. Since FCC chair Ajit Pai's plan to kill net neutrality was unveiled just before Thanksgiving, more than 1.3 million calls have been placed to members of Congress, demanding that they voice support for net neutrality and overrule the FCC's decision using the Congressional Review Act. (Battle for the Net has also set up a "scoreboard" for Americans to track their representatives' position on neutrality.)
Public opposition to the FCC's vote has also been reflected in new polls and an upsurge in consumer complaints.
A Huffington Post/YouGov survey published over the weekend found that only 20 percent of Americans who are aware of the concept of net neutrality support Pai's plan, while 57 percent oppose it.
And as Axios reported on Tuesday, consumers filed more than 2,000 complaints through the FCC's Consumer Complaint Center in December, up from just 157 in October.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.