The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block an $85 billion merger between AT&T and Time Warner--but Trump critics demanded the administration demonstrate that the decision had nothing to do with the president's ire for CNN, which is owned by Time Warner. (Photo: @latimes/Twitter)
Wary of Trump Motive, Experts Say Blocking AT&T/Time Warner Merger Is Right Decision
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do—and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons."
Consumer advocates concerned about monopoly power said Tuesday that while the Justice Department's decision to block AT&T's plans to take over Time Warner is the right one, President Donald Trump's motives for objecting to the merger are questionable.
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do--and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons," said Craig Aaron of Free Press in a statement. "This deal would give AT&T way too much power to undercut competitors and raise costs on TV viewers and internet users everywhere."
The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block AT&T's $85 billion bid for Time Warner, the parent company of a number of cable channels including CNN, with which Trump has had a contentious relationship.
The deal would concentrate an unprecedented amount of news and entertainment production in the hands of the country's largest telecommunications company, the possibility of which has led to bipartisan antitrust concerns.
Trump has complained about the news media's coverage of allegations that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, and has attacked the news outlets numerous times since entering office in January.
He has also singled out CNN reporters as distributing "fake news." Over the summer he tweeted a video of himself wrestling a man with a CNN logo over his head to the ground, and added the hashtags #FNN and #FraudNewsNetwork.
"It's refreshing to see the Justice Department doing something about this deal," said Aaron. "However, we remain very troubled by President Trump's threats to punish outlets like CNN that have aired critical coverage of the administration. The Justice Department must demonstrate that Trump's saber-rattling has nothing to do with this suit. It could start by giving the same level of scrutiny to other mega-deals like Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune."
In the Washington Post, Matt Stoller also expressed cautious approval of the administration's decision to block the deal.
"The fear President Trump might be using antitrust law to reward friends and punish enemies is valid and important," wrote Stoller. "But the way to deal with White House meddling in antitrust is not to stop enforcing the law (in this case, the Clayton Act), especially at a time of increasingly extreme concentration of power, specifically in media. Instead, both the DOJ and Congress must take every step they can to demonstrate the absolute integrity of the antitrust enforcement process."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Consumer advocates concerned about monopoly power said Tuesday that while the Justice Department's decision to block AT&T's plans to take over Time Warner is the right one, President Donald Trump's motives for objecting to the merger are questionable.
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do--and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons," said Craig Aaron of Free Press in a statement. "This deal would give AT&T way too much power to undercut competitors and raise costs on TV viewers and internet users everywhere."
The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block AT&T's $85 billion bid for Time Warner, the parent company of a number of cable channels including CNN, with which Trump has had a contentious relationship.
The deal would concentrate an unprecedented amount of news and entertainment production in the hands of the country's largest telecommunications company, the possibility of which has led to bipartisan antitrust concerns.
Trump has complained about the news media's coverage of allegations that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, and has attacked the news outlets numerous times since entering office in January.
He has also singled out CNN reporters as distributing "fake news." Over the summer he tweeted a video of himself wrestling a man with a CNN logo over his head to the ground, and added the hashtags #FNN and #FraudNewsNetwork.
"It's refreshing to see the Justice Department doing something about this deal," said Aaron. "However, we remain very troubled by President Trump's threats to punish outlets like CNN that have aired critical coverage of the administration. The Justice Department must demonstrate that Trump's saber-rattling has nothing to do with this suit. It could start by giving the same level of scrutiny to other mega-deals like Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune."
In the Washington Post, Matt Stoller also expressed cautious approval of the administration's decision to block the deal.
"The fear President Trump might be using antitrust law to reward friends and punish enemies is valid and important," wrote Stoller. "But the way to deal with White House meddling in antitrust is not to stop enforcing the law (in this case, the Clayton Act), especially at a time of increasingly extreme concentration of power, specifically in media. Instead, both the DOJ and Congress must take every step they can to demonstrate the absolute integrity of the antitrust enforcement process."
Consumer advocates concerned about monopoly power said Tuesday that while the Justice Department's decision to block AT&T's plans to take over Time Warner is the right one, President Donald Trump's motives for objecting to the merger are questionable.
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do--and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons," said Craig Aaron of Free Press in a statement. "This deal would give AT&T way too much power to undercut competitors and raise costs on TV viewers and internet users everywhere."
The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block AT&T's $85 billion bid for Time Warner, the parent company of a number of cable channels including CNN, with which Trump has had a contentious relationship.
The deal would concentrate an unprecedented amount of news and entertainment production in the hands of the country's largest telecommunications company, the possibility of which has led to bipartisan antitrust concerns.
Trump has complained about the news media's coverage of allegations that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, and has attacked the news outlets numerous times since entering office in January.
He has also singled out CNN reporters as distributing "fake news." Over the summer he tweeted a video of himself wrestling a man with a CNN logo over his head to the ground, and added the hashtags #FNN and #FraudNewsNetwork.
"It's refreshing to see the Justice Department doing something about this deal," said Aaron. "However, we remain very troubled by President Trump's threats to punish outlets like CNN that have aired critical coverage of the administration. The Justice Department must demonstrate that Trump's saber-rattling has nothing to do with this suit. It could start by giving the same level of scrutiny to other mega-deals like Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune."
In the Washington Post, Matt Stoller also expressed cautious approval of the administration's decision to block the deal.
"The fear President Trump might be using antitrust law to reward friends and punish enemies is valid and important," wrote Stoller. "But the way to deal with White House meddling in antitrust is not to stop enforcing the law (in this case, the Clayton Act), especially at a time of increasingly extreme concentration of power, specifically in media. Instead, both the DOJ and Congress must take every step they can to demonstrate the absolute integrity of the antitrust enforcement process."