SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block an $85 billion merger between AT&T and Time Warner--but Trump critics demanded the administration demonstrate that the decision had nothing to do with the president's ire for CNN, which is owned by Time Warner. (Photo: @latimes/Twitter)
Wary of Trump Motive, Experts Say Blocking AT&T/Time Warner Merger Is Right Decision
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do—and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons."
Nov 21, 2017
Consumer advocates concerned about monopoly power said Tuesday that while the Justice Department's decision to block AT&T's plans to take over Time Warner is the right one, President Donald Trump's motives for objecting to the merger are questionable.
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do--and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons," said Craig Aaron of Free Press in a statement. "This deal would give AT&T way too much power to undercut competitors and raise costs on TV viewers and internet users everywhere."
The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block AT&T's $85 billion bid for Time Warner, the parent company of a number of cable channels including CNN, with which Trump has had a contentious relationship.
The deal would concentrate an unprecedented amount of news and entertainment production in the hands of the country's largest telecommunications company, the possibility of which has led to bipartisan antitrust concerns.
Trump has complained about the news media's coverage of allegations that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, and has attacked the news outlets numerous times since entering office in January.
He has also singled out CNN reporters as distributing "fake news." Over the summer he tweeted a video of himself wrestling a man with a CNN logo over his head to the ground, and added the hashtags #FNN and #FraudNewsNetwork.
"It's refreshing to see the Justice Department doing something about this deal," said Aaron. "However, we remain very troubled by President Trump's threats to punish outlets like CNN that have aired critical coverage of the administration. The Justice Department must demonstrate that Trump's saber-rattling has nothing to do with this suit. It could start by giving the same level of scrutiny to other mega-deals like Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune."
In the Washington Post, Matt Stoller also expressed cautious approval of the administration's decision to block the deal.
"The fear President Trump might be using antitrust law to reward friends and punish enemies is valid and important," wrote Stoller. "But the way to deal with White House meddling in antitrust is not to stop enforcing the law (in this case, the Clayton Act), especially at a time of increasingly extreme concentration of power, specifically in media. Instead, both the DOJ and Congress must take every step they can to demonstrate the absolute integrity of the antitrust enforcement process."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Consumer advocates concerned about monopoly power said Tuesday that while the Justice Department's decision to block AT&T's plans to take over Time Warner is the right one, President Donald Trump's motives for objecting to the merger are questionable.
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do--and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons," said Craig Aaron of Free Press in a statement. "This deal would give AT&T way too much power to undercut competitors and raise costs on TV viewers and internet users everywhere."
The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block AT&T's $85 billion bid for Time Warner, the parent company of a number of cable channels including CNN, with which Trump has had a contentious relationship.
The deal would concentrate an unprecedented amount of news and entertainment production in the hands of the country's largest telecommunications company, the possibility of which has led to bipartisan antitrust concerns.
Trump has complained about the news media's coverage of allegations that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, and has attacked the news outlets numerous times since entering office in January.
He has also singled out CNN reporters as distributing "fake news." Over the summer he tweeted a video of himself wrestling a man with a CNN logo over his head to the ground, and added the hashtags #FNN and #FraudNewsNetwork.
"It's refreshing to see the Justice Department doing something about this deal," said Aaron. "However, we remain very troubled by President Trump's threats to punish outlets like CNN that have aired critical coverage of the administration. The Justice Department must demonstrate that Trump's saber-rattling has nothing to do with this suit. It could start by giving the same level of scrutiny to other mega-deals like Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune."
In the Washington Post, Matt Stoller also expressed cautious approval of the administration's decision to block the deal.
"The fear President Trump might be using antitrust law to reward friends and punish enemies is valid and important," wrote Stoller. "But the way to deal with White House meddling in antitrust is not to stop enforcing the law (in this case, the Clayton Act), especially at a time of increasingly extreme concentration of power, specifically in media. Instead, both the DOJ and Congress must take every step they can to demonstrate the absolute integrity of the antitrust enforcement process."
Consumer advocates concerned about monopoly power said Tuesday that while the Justice Department's decision to block AT&T's plans to take over Time Warner is the right one, President Donald Trump's motives for objecting to the merger are questionable.
"Blocking this merger is the right thing to do--and we hope the Justice Department is doing it for the right reasons," said Craig Aaron of Free Press in a statement. "This deal would give AT&T way too much power to undercut competitors and raise costs on TV viewers and internet users everywhere."
The DOJ mounted a lawsuit on Monday to block AT&T's $85 billion bid for Time Warner, the parent company of a number of cable channels including CNN, with which Trump has had a contentious relationship.
The deal would concentrate an unprecedented amount of news and entertainment production in the hands of the country's largest telecommunications company, the possibility of which has led to bipartisan antitrust concerns.
Trump has complained about the news media's coverage of allegations that his campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election, and has attacked the news outlets numerous times since entering office in January.
He has also singled out CNN reporters as distributing "fake news." Over the summer he tweeted a video of himself wrestling a man with a CNN logo over his head to the ground, and added the hashtags #FNN and #FraudNewsNetwork.
"It's refreshing to see the Justice Department doing something about this deal," said Aaron. "However, we remain very troubled by President Trump's threats to punish outlets like CNN that have aired critical coverage of the administration. The Justice Department must demonstrate that Trump's saber-rattling has nothing to do with this suit. It could start by giving the same level of scrutiny to other mega-deals like Sinclair's proposed merger with Tribune."
In the Washington Post, Matt Stoller also expressed cautious approval of the administration's decision to block the deal.
"The fear President Trump might be using antitrust law to reward friends and punish enemies is valid and important," wrote Stoller. "But the way to deal with White House meddling in antitrust is not to stop enforcing the law (in this case, the Clayton Act), especially at a time of increasingly extreme concentration of power, specifically in media. Instead, both the DOJ and Congress must take every step they can to demonstrate the absolute integrity of the antitrust enforcement process."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.