Nov 15, 2017
In a bipartisan show of support for endless war and out-of-control military spending, the House of Representatives on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved the nearly $700 billion National Defense Authorization Act of 2018 that aims to boost war outlays by $80 billion--an amount that critics noted would easily cover the costs of free public college tuition and other initiatives that are frequently dismissed as too expensive.
"Flint still doesn't have drinking water, we are told we cannot have affordable single-payer, free college education is too costly, we do not have money to help the homeless, we do not have money to fix our infrastructure."
--Matthew BattleThe final vote tally was 357-70, with 127 Democrats throwing their support behind the bill. Sixty-seven Democrats--including Reps. Barbara Lee of California, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, and John Conyers of Michigan--voted against the legislation.
In addition to providing cash for 90 F-35 jets--20 more than President Donald Trump requested--the measure also approves more than $12 billion for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, a massive boost in funding that comes amid soaring tensions between the United States and North Korea.
As the Associated Pressnotes, the legislation additionally "includes money for as many as 28 additional Ground-Based Interceptors, which are anti-missile missiles that would be launched from underground silos in Alaska in the event the U.S. decided to try to shoot down a North Korean missile heading toward the United States. The interceptors are designed to directly hit the enemy missile outside the Earth's atmosphere, obliterating it by the force of impact."
The House vote sets the stage for the Senate to debate the legislation shortly after Thanksgiving before sending it to Trump's desk. Because the measure far exceeds the $549 billion ceiling set by the Budget Control Act, "House and Senate leaders must strike a budget deal that increases the caps in order to boost defense spending as prescribed by the bill," Politicoreports.
Commentators were quick to slam the House for approving such a massive gift to the military while "Flint still doesn't have drinking water, we are told we cannot have affordable single-payer, free college education is too costly, we do not have money to help the homeless, we do not have money to fix our infrastructure."
\u201c"We can't afford to take action on climate change" https://t.co/aAZSbKLlBn\u201d— Eric Holthaus (@Eric Holthaus) 1510703060
\u201cBut universal health care and tuition free college are too expensive. https://t.co/JiShmRjZ8p\u201d— People for Bernie (@People for Bernie) 1510698767
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a bipartisan show of support for endless war and out-of-control military spending, the House of Representatives on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved the nearly $700 billion National Defense Authorization Act of 2018 that aims to boost war outlays by $80 billion--an amount that critics noted would easily cover the costs of free public college tuition and other initiatives that are frequently dismissed as too expensive.
"Flint still doesn't have drinking water, we are told we cannot have affordable single-payer, free college education is too costly, we do not have money to help the homeless, we do not have money to fix our infrastructure."
--Matthew BattleThe final vote tally was 357-70, with 127 Democrats throwing their support behind the bill. Sixty-seven Democrats--including Reps. Barbara Lee of California, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, and John Conyers of Michigan--voted against the legislation.
In addition to providing cash for 90 F-35 jets--20 more than President Donald Trump requested--the measure also approves more than $12 billion for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, a massive boost in funding that comes amid soaring tensions between the United States and North Korea.
As the Associated Pressnotes, the legislation additionally "includes money for as many as 28 additional Ground-Based Interceptors, which are anti-missile missiles that would be launched from underground silos in Alaska in the event the U.S. decided to try to shoot down a North Korean missile heading toward the United States. The interceptors are designed to directly hit the enemy missile outside the Earth's atmosphere, obliterating it by the force of impact."
The House vote sets the stage for the Senate to debate the legislation shortly after Thanksgiving before sending it to Trump's desk. Because the measure far exceeds the $549 billion ceiling set by the Budget Control Act, "House and Senate leaders must strike a budget deal that increases the caps in order to boost defense spending as prescribed by the bill," Politicoreports.
Commentators were quick to slam the House for approving such a massive gift to the military while "Flint still doesn't have drinking water, we are told we cannot have affordable single-payer, free college education is too costly, we do not have money to help the homeless, we do not have money to fix our infrastructure."
\u201c"We can't afford to take action on climate change" https://t.co/aAZSbKLlBn\u201d— Eric Holthaus (@Eric Holthaus) 1510703060
\u201cBut universal health care and tuition free college are too expensive. https://t.co/JiShmRjZ8p\u201d— People for Bernie (@People for Bernie) 1510698767
In a bipartisan show of support for endless war and out-of-control military spending, the House of Representatives on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved the nearly $700 billion National Defense Authorization Act of 2018 that aims to boost war outlays by $80 billion--an amount that critics noted would easily cover the costs of free public college tuition and other initiatives that are frequently dismissed as too expensive.
"Flint still doesn't have drinking water, we are told we cannot have affordable single-payer, free college education is too costly, we do not have money to help the homeless, we do not have money to fix our infrastructure."
--Matthew BattleThe final vote tally was 357-70, with 127 Democrats throwing their support behind the bill. Sixty-seven Democrats--including Reps. Barbara Lee of California, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, and John Conyers of Michigan--voted against the legislation.
In addition to providing cash for 90 F-35 jets--20 more than President Donald Trump requested--the measure also approves more than $12 billion for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, a massive boost in funding that comes amid soaring tensions between the United States and North Korea.
As the Associated Pressnotes, the legislation additionally "includes money for as many as 28 additional Ground-Based Interceptors, which are anti-missile missiles that would be launched from underground silos in Alaska in the event the U.S. decided to try to shoot down a North Korean missile heading toward the United States. The interceptors are designed to directly hit the enemy missile outside the Earth's atmosphere, obliterating it by the force of impact."
The House vote sets the stage for the Senate to debate the legislation shortly after Thanksgiving before sending it to Trump's desk. Because the measure far exceeds the $549 billion ceiling set by the Budget Control Act, "House and Senate leaders must strike a budget deal that increases the caps in order to boost defense spending as prescribed by the bill," Politicoreports.
Commentators were quick to slam the House for approving such a massive gift to the military while "Flint still doesn't have drinking water, we are told we cannot have affordable single-payer, free college education is too costly, we do not have money to help the homeless, we do not have money to fix our infrastructure."
\u201c"We can't afford to take action on climate change" https://t.co/aAZSbKLlBn\u201d— Eric Holthaus (@Eric Holthaus) 1510703060
\u201cBut universal health care and tuition free college are too expensive. https://t.co/JiShmRjZ8p\u201d— People for Bernie (@People for Bernie) 1510698767
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.