SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Reproductive rights advocates gathered outside the Department of Health and Human Services on Oct. 20 for a #JusticeForJane rally. (Photo: National Partnership for Women & Families/@NPWF/Twitter)
#JusticeForJane: Abortion Rights Activists Rally as US Govt Holds Teen 'Hostage'
"What this administration is doing to Jane is what they'd do to every woman in this country if they could," says advocate as government attempts to block teen from having procedure
Oct 20, 2017
As reproductive rights advocates rallied outside the Department of Health and Human Services on Friday morning in support of an undocumented 17-year-old seeking an abortion, an ACLU attorney attended a federal court hearing on the teenager's behalf to challenge attempts by Trump administration officials to prevent her from terminating her pregnancy.
Outside HHS: "Not the church, not the state! Women must decide their fate!" #JusticeForJane @NARAL @peoplepower @NLIRH @PPFA @Rewire_News pic.twitter.com/ayIPjoXgQa
-- Lauryn Gutierrez (@GutzyLo) October 20, 2017
The ACLU has filed a lawsuit on the grounds that a policy established by the Trump administration's Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) that effectively bars undocumented minors in federal custody from accessing abortion is unconstitutional.
Three weeks after the teenager from Central America, referred to only as Jane Doe, was initially scheduled to visit an abortion provider in Texas--after receiving a waiver from a state court, which is required because she is a minor--a D.C. District Court judge on Wednesday ruled that she must be allowed to have the procedure.
However, the federal government--which claims it is posing no undue burden on the teen by blocking her attempts to abort her pregnancy--immediately filed an appeal, prompting the D.C. Circuit Court to issue an administrative stay on Thursday. The decision temporarily delayed Jane Doe's abortion, which had been rescheduled for Friday, Oct. 20.
Instead, on Friday morning, the appeals court--reportedly for the first time--allowed audio of the hearing to be livestreamed online. As ACLU attorney Brigitte Amiri explained to the court why the government's actions have violated the teen's constitutional rights, the group summarized the arguments on Twitter.
After the hearing, Amiri told NBC's Charlie Gile: "It's blatantly unconstitutional what the government is doing to Jane Doe. They are holding her hostage and preventing her from having an abortion--and also, the harm to her is so great, and the harm to the government is nonexistent."
Reporters and pro-choice advocates who listened in highlighted flaws in arguments made by the government attorney.
Advocates also pointed to the case as an example of the Trump administration's broader efforts to limit women's healthcare, particularly access to reproductive care.
"What this administration is doing to Jane is what they'd do to every woman in this country if they could," said writer and women's advocate Sarah Lipton-Lubet. "This is true 100%," Arimi responded, following the hearing.
While Jane Doe remains approximately 15 weeks pregnant (Texas bans abortion after 20 weeks), the Circuit Court has yet to issue a final ruling on the case.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As reproductive rights advocates rallied outside the Department of Health and Human Services on Friday morning in support of an undocumented 17-year-old seeking an abortion, an ACLU attorney attended a federal court hearing on the teenager's behalf to challenge attempts by Trump administration officials to prevent her from terminating her pregnancy.
Outside HHS: "Not the church, not the state! Women must decide their fate!" #JusticeForJane @NARAL @peoplepower @NLIRH @PPFA @Rewire_News pic.twitter.com/ayIPjoXgQa
-- Lauryn Gutierrez (@GutzyLo) October 20, 2017
The ACLU has filed a lawsuit on the grounds that a policy established by the Trump administration's Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) that effectively bars undocumented minors in federal custody from accessing abortion is unconstitutional.
Three weeks after the teenager from Central America, referred to only as Jane Doe, was initially scheduled to visit an abortion provider in Texas--after receiving a waiver from a state court, which is required because she is a minor--a D.C. District Court judge on Wednesday ruled that she must be allowed to have the procedure.
However, the federal government--which claims it is posing no undue burden on the teen by blocking her attempts to abort her pregnancy--immediately filed an appeal, prompting the D.C. Circuit Court to issue an administrative stay on Thursday. The decision temporarily delayed Jane Doe's abortion, which had been rescheduled for Friday, Oct. 20.
Instead, on Friday morning, the appeals court--reportedly for the first time--allowed audio of the hearing to be livestreamed online. As ACLU attorney Brigitte Amiri explained to the court why the government's actions have violated the teen's constitutional rights, the group summarized the arguments on Twitter.
After the hearing, Amiri told NBC's Charlie Gile: "It's blatantly unconstitutional what the government is doing to Jane Doe. They are holding her hostage and preventing her from having an abortion--and also, the harm to her is so great, and the harm to the government is nonexistent."
Reporters and pro-choice advocates who listened in highlighted flaws in arguments made by the government attorney.
Advocates also pointed to the case as an example of the Trump administration's broader efforts to limit women's healthcare, particularly access to reproductive care.
"What this administration is doing to Jane is what they'd do to every woman in this country if they could," said writer and women's advocate Sarah Lipton-Lubet. "This is true 100%," Arimi responded, following the hearing.
While Jane Doe remains approximately 15 weeks pregnant (Texas bans abortion after 20 weeks), the Circuit Court has yet to issue a final ruling on the case.
As reproductive rights advocates rallied outside the Department of Health and Human Services on Friday morning in support of an undocumented 17-year-old seeking an abortion, an ACLU attorney attended a federal court hearing on the teenager's behalf to challenge attempts by Trump administration officials to prevent her from terminating her pregnancy.
Outside HHS: "Not the church, not the state! Women must decide their fate!" #JusticeForJane @NARAL @peoplepower @NLIRH @PPFA @Rewire_News pic.twitter.com/ayIPjoXgQa
-- Lauryn Gutierrez (@GutzyLo) October 20, 2017
The ACLU has filed a lawsuit on the grounds that a policy established by the Trump administration's Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) that effectively bars undocumented minors in federal custody from accessing abortion is unconstitutional.
Three weeks after the teenager from Central America, referred to only as Jane Doe, was initially scheduled to visit an abortion provider in Texas--after receiving a waiver from a state court, which is required because she is a minor--a D.C. District Court judge on Wednesday ruled that she must be allowed to have the procedure.
However, the federal government--which claims it is posing no undue burden on the teen by blocking her attempts to abort her pregnancy--immediately filed an appeal, prompting the D.C. Circuit Court to issue an administrative stay on Thursday. The decision temporarily delayed Jane Doe's abortion, which had been rescheduled for Friday, Oct. 20.
Instead, on Friday morning, the appeals court--reportedly for the first time--allowed audio of the hearing to be livestreamed online. As ACLU attorney Brigitte Amiri explained to the court why the government's actions have violated the teen's constitutional rights, the group summarized the arguments on Twitter.
After the hearing, Amiri told NBC's Charlie Gile: "It's blatantly unconstitutional what the government is doing to Jane Doe. They are holding her hostage and preventing her from having an abortion--and also, the harm to her is so great, and the harm to the government is nonexistent."
Reporters and pro-choice advocates who listened in highlighted flaws in arguments made by the government attorney.
Advocates also pointed to the case as an example of the Trump administration's broader efforts to limit women's healthcare, particularly access to reproductive care.
"What this administration is doing to Jane is what they'd do to every woman in this country if they could," said writer and women's advocate Sarah Lipton-Lubet. "This is true 100%," Arimi responded, following the hearing.
While Jane Doe remains approximately 15 weeks pregnant (Texas bans abortion after 20 weeks), the Circuit Court has yet to issue a final ruling on the case.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy