Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

While tech companies like Google tend to champion progress in the way of diversity and social support programs, a new survey finds that high-powered tech leaders have negative views toward labor unions and government regulation.

While tech companies like Google tend to champion progress in the way of diversity and social support programs, a new survey finds that high-powered tech leaders have negative views toward labor unions and government regulation. (Photo: Steve Rhodes/Flickr/cc)

Applauded for Stances on Social Issues, Poll Highlights Silicon Valley's Disdain for Unions and Regulation

While tech leaders tout their socially liberal views, new survey exposes hostility toward organized workers and government oversight

Julia Conley

While the tech industry has recently taken credit for taking progressive stances on key social issues, a new survey shows that the political views of Silicon Valley's most influential players are not as clear-cut as they may appear—with many showing hostility to the rights of workers and and taking a dim view of government's oversight role.

While wealthy tech executives have loudly condemned racism and showed strong support for issues like marriage equality, universal healthcare, and the at-risk Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, researchers have found those in the top levels of the industry also harbor strong anti-regulation and anti-union sentiments.

In the first comprehensive study of political views in the increasingly powerful industry, Stanford University researchers compared the political opinions of more than 600 wealthy technologists to those of Democratic and Republican donors and voters.

Seventy-four percent of the tech executives said they would like to see labor unions' influence decrease, while only 33 percent of Democratic voters and 18 percent of donors agreed with this—"making technology entrepreneurs most similar to extremely anti-union Republican donors" on the issue of labor.

Tech leaders also reported hostility toward government regulation of business and products including drones, self-driving cars, and tech companies. "They are also much more likely to believe that government regulation of business does more harm than good," said Stanford's report, noting that 70 percent of tech entrepreneurs say the government should not regulate Uber as it does taxis—a clear anti-worker position.

The study's authors say their findings "add nuance to our understanding of how rising income inequality will impact American politics." As socially liberal tech entrepreneurs become wealthier, the Democratic Party is sure to take notice, with tech firms gaining influence by way of ever-larger campaign contributions.

"At the same time," the report says, "technology entrepreneurs' hostility to government regulation, especially of labor markets, and their extremely negative views towards unions appear likely to lead to high-profile conflicts within the Democratic Party coalition going forward. Theories of political development predict that as a powerful group gains influence within a party it can steer party ideologies and platforms toward its policy views and priorities."

In other words, the tech industry's views on unions and regulation could have the effect of pushing the Democratic Party further to the right.

Meanwhile, technologists' progressive views on social issues tend to fall in line with popular opinion. Silicon Valley was applauded for criticizing President Donald Trump after he said he would ban transgender Americans from serving in the military, siding with 68 percent of Americans who said transgender people should be allowed to serve. The industry also spoke out in support for DACA this week, joining 58 percent of Americans who oppose Trump's rollback of the law.

Stanford's survey comes as some progressives are raising alarms about Silicon Valley's increasingly consolidated wealth and its heightened power in Washington. Former Labor Secretary and author Robert Reich wrote on Tuesday about Google's outsized financial and political power, and the recent controversy that put both on display. Reich compared Google's link to the firing of a New America Foundation fellow who praised the European Commission's decision to fine Google for violating antitrust rules, with the president's history of suppressing his critics while consolidating his power.

"Consider Donald J. Trump," wrote Reich. "It may seem odd to mention Trump at the same time I'm talking about Google. Google's executives tend to be on the left. Eric Schmidt [the executive chairman of Google's parent company] was a major backer of Hillary Clinton. But power is power, and Trump has demonstrated a similar tendency to throw his ever-expanding weight around. Like Google, he doesn't particularly like to be criticized, if you hadn't noticed....Whether it's a giant left-leaning corporation or an unhinged alt-right president, the underlying problem is the same. It imperils our democracy and breeds distrust in our system. Such abuse of power is morally wrong."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

... We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

'Like a Teenager Promising to Clean Their Room in 30 Years': Biden Net-Zero Climate Goal for 2050 Ridiculed

"2050 is an extremely weak goal for the federal government to free itself from climate-heating pollution. It ignores existing technology and adds decades to GSA's own commitment to 100% renewable energy by 2025."

Brett Wilkins ·

Biden Should Cancel Student Debt or Watch $85 Billion Evaporate From US Economy: Analysis

Far-reaching cancellation enacted by Biden could add more than $173 billion to the nation's GDP in 2022 alone.

Kenny Stancil ·

Given Cover by Red-Baiting GOP, Corporate Dems Rebuked for Tanking Biden Nominee for Top Bank Regulator

"If you think that Senate Democrats rose up to [Republicans'] shameful display of modern McCarthyism by rallying around President Biden's nominee or her ideas that banking should work for the middle class, then you don't know the soul of today's Democratic Party," wrote one columnist.

Julia Conley ·

'S.O.S.!': Groups in Red States Nationwide Plead With Democrats to Pass Voting Rights Bill

"We can tell you firsthand that our Republican senators have no interest in joining this effort."

Jake Johnson ·

Revealed: US Public Pension Funds Are 'Quiet Culprits of Climate Chaos'

One activist called divestment "an ethical responsibility" given that "maintaining the status quo of fossil fuel energy production and investments will unquestionably lead to a self-created catastrophe."

Jessica Corbett ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo