SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt speaks after U.S. President Donald Trump announced his decision to pull the United States out of the Paris climate agreement in the Rose Garden at the White House June 1, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'Putting Politics Before Science,' Trump's EPA Restricting Grants for Climate Research
A political appointee in charge of vetting grants has said he is "on the lookout for 'the double C-word'—climate change"
Sep 05, 2017
"To sum up, someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
--Don Moynihan, University of Wisconsin-Madison
In what environmentalists characterized as an "outrageous" scheme by the Trump administration to put "politics before science," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now only issuing grants and awards if they are approved by a political appointee, the Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin reported on Monday.
John Konkus--a GOP operative who served as President Donald Trump's Leon County, Florida campaign chairman--now "reviews every award the agency gives out, along with every grant solicitation before it is issued," Eilperin noted.
She continued:
According to both career and political employees, Konkus has told staff that he is on the lookout for "the double C-word"--climate change--and repeatedly has instructed grant officers to eliminate references to the subject in solicitations.
Konkus, who officially works in the EPA's public affairs office, has canceled close to $2 million competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations. Although his review has primarily affected Obama administration priorities, it is the heavily Republican state of Alaska that has undergone the most scrutiny so far.
Liz Bowman, an EPA spokeswoman, made clear in an interview with the Post that the purpose behind having a political aide "screen" awards and grants has nothing to do with scientific merit.
Rather, Konkus's role is "ensure funding is in line with the agency's mission and policy priorities," Bowman said.
Given the Trump administration's moves during its first seven months in power--which include withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and dismantling regulations aimed at protecting the air and water--environmentalists warned that the EPA's new standard for grants and awards essentially amounts to a ban on climate funding.
\u201cOutrageous! #PollutingPruitt's @EPA putting politics before science...again! https://t.co/Gw7hM6tYKh\u201d— Friends of the Earth (Action) (@Friends of the Earth (Action)) 1504621884
\u201cOur @EPA in 2017: One political appointee rejecting millions in grant $ for containing words like "climate change" https://t.co/IUSA4lcB0K\u201d— Joe Hanson (@Joe Hanson) 1504617309
Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that Trump's politicization of the EPA also harms "local leaders struggling to protect their communities from pollution."
"To sum up," concluded Don Moynihan, professor of government at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"To sum up, someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
--Don Moynihan, University of Wisconsin-Madison
In what environmentalists characterized as an "outrageous" scheme by the Trump administration to put "politics before science," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now only issuing grants and awards if they are approved by a political appointee, the Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin reported on Monday.
John Konkus--a GOP operative who served as President Donald Trump's Leon County, Florida campaign chairman--now "reviews every award the agency gives out, along with every grant solicitation before it is issued," Eilperin noted.
She continued:
According to both career and political employees, Konkus has told staff that he is on the lookout for "the double C-word"--climate change--and repeatedly has instructed grant officers to eliminate references to the subject in solicitations.
Konkus, who officially works in the EPA's public affairs office, has canceled close to $2 million competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations. Although his review has primarily affected Obama administration priorities, it is the heavily Republican state of Alaska that has undergone the most scrutiny so far.
Liz Bowman, an EPA spokeswoman, made clear in an interview with the Post that the purpose behind having a political aide "screen" awards and grants has nothing to do with scientific merit.
Rather, Konkus's role is "ensure funding is in line with the agency's mission and policy priorities," Bowman said.
Given the Trump administration's moves during its first seven months in power--which include withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and dismantling regulations aimed at protecting the air and water--environmentalists warned that the EPA's new standard for grants and awards essentially amounts to a ban on climate funding.
\u201cOutrageous! #PollutingPruitt's @EPA putting politics before science...again! https://t.co/Gw7hM6tYKh\u201d— Friends of the Earth (Action) (@Friends of the Earth (Action)) 1504621884
\u201cOur @EPA in 2017: One political appointee rejecting millions in grant $ for containing words like "climate change" https://t.co/IUSA4lcB0K\u201d— Joe Hanson (@Joe Hanson) 1504617309
Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that Trump's politicization of the EPA also harms "local leaders struggling to protect their communities from pollution."
"To sum up," concluded Don Moynihan, professor of government at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
"To sum up, someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
--Don Moynihan, University of Wisconsin-Madison
In what environmentalists characterized as an "outrageous" scheme by the Trump administration to put "politics before science," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now only issuing grants and awards if they are approved by a political appointee, the Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin reported on Monday.
John Konkus--a GOP operative who served as President Donald Trump's Leon County, Florida campaign chairman--now "reviews every award the agency gives out, along with every grant solicitation before it is issued," Eilperin noted.
She continued:
According to both career and political employees, Konkus has told staff that he is on the lookout for "the double C-word"--climate change--and repeatedly has instructed grant officers to eliminate references to the subject in solicitations.
Konkus, who officially works in the EPA's public affairs office, has canceled close to $2 million competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations. Although his review has primarily affected Obama administration priorities, it is the heavily Republican state of Alaska that has undergone the most scrutiny so far.
Liz Bowman, an EPA spokeswoman, made clear in an interview with the Post that the purpose behind having a political aide "screen" awards and grants has nothing to do with scientific merit.
Rather, Konkus's role is "ensure funding is in line with the agency's mission and policy priorities," Bowman said.
Given the Trump administration's moves during its first seven months in power--which include withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and dismantling regulations aimed at protecting the air and water--environmentalists warned that the EPA's new standard for grants and awards essentially amounts to a ban on climate funding.
\u201cOutrageous! #PollutingPruitt's @EPA putting politics before science...again! https://t.co/Gw7hM6tYKh\u201d— Friends of the Earth (Action) (@Friends of the Earth (Action)) 1504621884
\u201cOur @EPA in 2017: One political appointee rejecting millions in grant $ for containing words like "climate change" https://t.co/IUSA4lcB0K\u201d— Joe Hanson (@Joe Hanson) 1504617309
Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that Trump's politicization of the EPA also harms "local leaders struggling to protect their communities from pollution."
"To sum up," concluded Don Moynihan, professor of government at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.