EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt speaks after U.S. President Donald Trump announced his decision to pull the United States out of the Paris climate agreement in the Rose Garden at the White House June 1, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'Putting Politics Before Science,' Trump's EPA Restricting Grants for Climate Research
A political appointee in charge of vetting grants has said he is "on the lookout for 'the double C-word'—climate change"
"To sum up, someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
--Don Moynihan, University of Wisconsin-Madison
In what environmentalists characterized as an "outrageous" scheme by the Trump administration to put "politics before science," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now only issuing grants and awards if they are approved by a political appointee, the Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin reported on Monday.
John Konkus--a GOP operative who served as President Donald Trump's Leon County, Florida campaign chairman--now "reviews every award the agency gives out, along with every grant solicitation before it is issued," Eilperin noted.
She continued:
According to both career and political employees, Konkus has told staff that he is on the lookout for "the double C-word"--climate change--and repeatedly has instructed grant officers to eliminate references to the subject in solicitations.
Konkus, who officially works in the EPA's public affairs office, has canceled close to $2 million competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations. Although his review has primarily affected Obama administration priorities, it is the heavily Republican state of Alaska that has undergone the most scrutiny so far.
Liz Bowman, an EPA spokeswoman, made clear in an interview with the Post that the purpose behind having a political aide "screen" awards and grants has nothing to do with scientific merit.
Rather, Konkus's role is "ensure funding is in line with the agency's mission and policy priorities," Bowman said.
Given the Trump administration's moves during its first seven months in power--which include withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and dismantling regulations aimed at protecting the air and water--environmentalists warned that the EPA's new standard for grants and awards essentially amounts to a ban on climate funding.
Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that Trump's politicization of the EPA also harms "local leaders struggling to protect their communities from pollution."
"To sum up," concluded Don Moynihan, professor of government at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
"To sum up, someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
--Don Moynihan, University of Wisconsin-Madison
In what environmentalists characterized as an "outrageous" scheme by the Trump administration to put "politics before science," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now only issuing grants and awards if they are approved by a political appointee, the Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin reported on Monday.
John Konkus--a GOP operative who served as President Donald Trump's Leon County, Florida campaign chairman--now "reviews every award the agency gives out, along with every grant solicitation before it is issued," Eilperin noted.
She continued:
According to both career and political employees, Konkus has told staff that he is on the lookout for "the double C-word"--climate change--and repeatedly has instructed grant officers to eliminate references to the subject in solicitations.
Konkus, who officially works in the EPA's public affairs office, has canceled close to $2 million competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations. Although his review has primarily affected Obama administration priorities, it is the heavily Republican state of Alaska that has undergone the most scrutiny so far.
Liz Bowman, an EPA spokeswoman, made clear in an interview with the Post that the purpose behind having a political aide "screen" awards and grants has nothing to do with scientific merit.
Rather, Konkus's role is "ensure funding is in line with the agency's mission and policy priorities," Bowman said.
Given the Trump administration's moves during its first seven months in power--which include withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and dismantling regulations aimed at protecting the air and water--environmentalists warned that the EPA's new standard for grants and awards essentially amounts to a ban on climate funding.
Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that Trump's politicization of the EPA also harms "local leaders struggling to protect their communities from pollution."
"To sum up," concluded Don Moynihan, professor of government at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
"To sum up, someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."
--Don Moynihan, University of Wisconsin-Madison
In what environmentalists characterized as an "outrageous" scheme by the Trump administration to put "politics before science," the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now only issuing grants and awards if they are approved by a political appointee, the Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin reported on Monday.
John Konkus--a GOP operative who served as President Donald Trump's Leon County, Florida campaign chairman--now "reviews every award the agency gives out, along with every grant solicitation before it is issued," Eilperin noted.
She continued:
According to both career and political employees, Konkus has told staff that he is on the lookout for "the double C-word"--climate change--and repeatedly has instructed grant officers to eliminate references to the subject in solicitations.
Konkus, who officially works in the EPA's public affairs office, has canceled close to $2 million competitively awarded to universities and nonprofit organizations. Although his review has primarily affected Obama administration priorities, it is the heavily Republican state of Alaska that has undergone the most scrutiny so far.
Liz Bowman, an EPA spokeswoman, made clear in an interview with the Post that the purpose behind having a political aide "screen" awards and grants has nothing to do with scientific merit.
Rather, Konkus's role is "ensure funding is in line with the agency's mission and policy priorities," Bowman said.
Given the Trump administration's moves during its first seven months in power--which include withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris climate accord and dismantling regulations aimed at protecting the air and water--environmentalists warned that the EPA's new standard for grants and awards essentially amounts to a ban on climate funding.
Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, argued that Trump's politicization of the EPA also harms "local leaders struggling to protect their communities from pollution."
"To sum up," concluded Don Moynihan, professor of government at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, "someone with no scientific expertise is deciding on science grants for reasons of ideology and spite."