Civil rights groups spoke out on Wednesday about the Trump administration\u0026#039;s decision to scrap a rule aimed at preventing pay discrimination.President Obama introduced a directive that would have gone into effect early next year, requiring businesses with 100 or more employees to track wages for workers of various genders, race, and ethnicities and report the data to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In defending their decision, the Trump administration claimed the rule would put unrealistic expectations on large employers.The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights called the White House\u0026#039;s decision \u0022shameful.\u0022What a shameful move. This is a critical #equalpay initiative to address the persistent problem of race, sex, and ethnicity discrimination. https://t.co/6zTbnEgolr— Civil Rights (@civilrightsorg) August 30, 2017The National Women\u0026#039;s Law Center (NWLC) said the move represented \u0022a clear message to employers: if you want to ignore pay inequities and sweep them under the rug, this Administration has your back.\u0022\u0026nbsp;\u0022This is not a technical tweak as they would have you believe. Make no mistake—it\u0026#039;s an all-out attack on equal pay.\u0022—Fatima Goss Graves, National Women\u0026#039;s Law CenterIn an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Neomi Rao of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs called the rule \u0022enormously burdensome\u0022 and said, \u0022We don\u0026#039;t believe it would actually help us gather information about wage and employment discrimination.\u0022Fatima Goss Graves of the NWLC rejected Rao\u0026#039;s attempt to portray the White House\u0026#039;s decision as a minor change to its own attempts to gather information about pay gaps:We see through the Trump Administration\u0026#039;s call to halt the equal pay rule that requires employers to collect and submit pay data by gender, race, and ethnicity to the government. This is not a technical tweak as they would have you believe. Make no mistake—it\u0026#039;s an all-out attack on equal pay.The EEOC has made clear why hard data on wage discrepancies is needed to combat pay gaps.Without the measure, \u0022we\u0026#039;d learn about a pay-discrimination problem because someone saw a piece of paper left on a copy machine or someone was complaining about their salary to co-workers,\u0022 said chairwoman Jenny Yang when the rules were drafted by the Obama administration.Ivanka Trump, who serves as an advisor in the White House and has been cast by many in the media as a moderating force in the Trump administration with a special interest in clearing the way for pay equality for women, supported the decision to scrap the rule.\u0022Ultimately, while I believe the intention was good and agree that pay transparency is important, the proposed policy would not yield the intended results,\u0022 said Trump.According to a report in The Hill, Trump also oversaw an internal review of the White House Council on Women and Girls that resulted in the office\u0026#039;s closure in June.