SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Nikki Haley, United States ambassador to the United Nations, receives a note from an aide during an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council at United Nations headquarters, July 5, 2017 in New York City. The United States requested an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council after North Korea tested an intercontinental ballistic missile earlier this week. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
North Korea Says US Wrong to Think It Is 'Safe Across the Ocean'
Painting America as the aggressor, Pyongyang says its nuclear arsenal is a non-negotiable deterrent while vowing "thousand-fold" revenge for new UN sanctions
Aug 07, 2017
On the heels of a unanimous vote by the United Nations Security Council to impose new sanctions on North Korea following a series of ballistic missile tests, Pyongyang charged on Monday that the punitive measures are a "violent infringement" of the nation's sovereignty and vowed "thousands-fold" revenge.
"My hope is that the Trump administration recognizes that, okay, tighter economic sanctions is one possibility, but frankly, we've tried that, and it hasn't really worked."
--John Feffer, Foreign Policy In FocusThe retaliatory threats were issued by the Kim Jong-un regime and broadcast by the North's official Korean Central News Agency. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley hailed the sanctions as "the single largest economic sanctions package ever leveled against the North Korean regime," a message echoed by President Donald Trump.
"It's a wild idea to think the [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] will be shaken and change its position due to this kind of new sanctions formulated by hostile forces," Pyongyang said in response. The regime also warned that there is "no bigger mistake than the United States believing that its land is safe across the ocean."
In a speech at the ASEAN Regional Forum on Monday, North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho painted the United States as the aggressor and said "possession of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles is a legitimate option for self-defense in the face of a clear and real nuclear threat posed by the U.S."
Though experts told the Associated Press that the North is "not likely to launch a direct provocation against the United States," the North's comments alarmed analysts and commentators who fear that the prospects for de-escalation are dwindling by the day.
As Common Dreams reported last week, some of the world's most powerful nations have intensified military activities in recent weeks, and activists have warned that the threat of a "nuclear nightmare" looms if diplomatic efforts are not undertaken with urgency.
Adding to the growing concerns is Trump's erratic and unpredictable behavior, which includes what The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill recently called "a disturbing pattern of reckless spontaneity, usually expressed publicly through his Twitter feed."
In an interview with Scahill last week, John Feffer, Korea expert and co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies, warned of the "shadow nuts" that have Trump's ear and concluded that negotiations--not sanctions or pre-emptive military actions, as have been floated by some influential voices--are the only plausible way forward.
"My hope is that the Trump administration recognizes that, okay, tighter economic sanctions is one possibility, but frankly, we've tried that, and it hasn't really worked," Feffer said. "But negotiations, well, they have worked, and [they] worked in 1994, even worked during the George W. Bush administration with the six-party talks. Both of those agreements led to effective freezes and even some dismantlement of North Korea's nuclear capability. So that's the no-brainer as far as I'm concerned, it's just a question of whether the Trump administration comes to that realization as well."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
On the heels of a unanimous vote by the United Nations Security Council to impose new sanctions on North Korea following a series of ballistic missile tests, Pyongyang charged on Monday that the punitive measures are a "violent infringement" of the nation's sovereignty and vowed "thousands-fold" revenge.
"My hope is that the Trump administration recognizes that, okay, tighter economic sanctions is one possibility, but frankly, we've tried that, and it hasn't really worked."
--John Feffer, Foreign Policy In FocusThe retaliatory threats were issued by the Kim Jong-un regime and broadcast by the North's official Korean Central News Agency. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley hailed the sanctions as "the single largest economic sanctions package ever leveled against the North Korean regime," a message echoed by President Donald Trump.
"It's a wild idea to think the [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] will be shaken and change its position due to this kind of new sanctions formulated by hostile forces," Pyongyang said in response. The regime also warned that there is "no bigger mistake than the United States believing that its land is safe across the ocean."
In a speech at the ASEAN Regional Forum on Monday, North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho painted the United States as the aggressor and said "possession of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles is a legitimate option for self-defense in the face of a clear and real nuclear threat posed by the U.S."
Though experts told the Associated Press that the North is "not likely to launch a direct provocation against the United States," the North's comments alarmed analysts and commentators who fear that the prospects for de-escalation are dwindling by the day.
As Common Dreams reported last week, some of the world's most powerful nations have intensified military activities in recent weeks, and activists have warned that the threat of a "nuclear nightmare" looms if diplomatic efforts are not undertaken with urgency.
Adding to the growing concerns is Trump's erratic and unpredictable behavior, which includes what The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill recently called "a disturbing pattern of reckless spontaneity, usually expressed publicly through his Twitter feed."
In an interview with Scahill last week, John Feffer, Korea expert and co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies, warned of the "shadow nuts" that have Trump's ear and concluded that negotiations--not sanctions or pre-emptive military actions, as have been floated by some influential voices--are the only plausible way forward.
"My hope is that the Trump administration recognizes that, okay, tighter economic sanctions is one possibility, but frankly, we've tried that, and it hasn't really worked," Feffer said. "But negotiations, well, they have worked, and [they] worked in 1994, even worked during the George W. Bush administration with the six-party talks. Both of those agreements led to effective freezes and even some dismantlement of North Korea's nuclear capability. So that's the no-brainer as far as I'm concerned, it's just a question of whether the Trump administration comes to that realization as well."
On the heels of a unanimous vote by the United Nations Security Council to impose new sanctions on North Korea following a series of ballistic missile tests, Pyongyang charged on Monday that the punitive measures are a "violent infringement" of the nation's sovereignty and vowed "thousands-fold" revenge.
"My hope is that the Trump administration recognizes that, okay, tighter economic sanctions is one possibility, but frankly, we've tried that, and it hasn't really worked."
--John Feffer, Foreign Policy In FocusThe retaliatory threats were issued by the Kim Jong-un regime and broadcast by the North's official Korean Central News Agency. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Nikki Haley hailed the sanctions as "the single largest economic sanctions package ever leveled against the North Korean regime," a message echoed by President Donald Trump.
"It's a wild idea to think the [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] will be shaken and change its position due to this kind of new sanctions formulated by hostile forces," Pyongyang said in response. The regime also warned that there is "no bigger mistake than the United States believing that its land is safe across the ocean."
In a speech at the ASEAN Regional Forum on Monday, North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho painted the United States as the aggressor and said "possession of nuclear weapons and intercontinental ballistic missiles is a legitimate option for self-defense in the face of a clear and real nuclear threat posed by the U.S."
Though experts told the Associated Press that the North is "not likely to launch a direct provocation against the United States," the North's comments alarmed analysts and commentators who fear that the prospects for de-escalation are dwindling by the day.
As Common Dreams reported last week, some of the world's most powerful nations have intensified military activities in recent weeks, and activists have warned that the threat of a "nuclear nightmare" looms if diplomatic efforts are not undertaken with urgency.
Adding to the growing concerns is Trump's erratic and unpredictable behavior, which includes what The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill recently called "a disturbing pattern of reckless spontaneity, usually expressed publicly through his Twitter feed."
In an interview with Scahill last week, John Feffer, Korea expert and co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies, warned of the "shadow nuts" that have Trump's ear and concluded that negotiations--not sanctions or pre-emptive military actions, as have been floated by some influential voices--are the only plausible way forward.
"My hope is that the Trump administration recognizes that, okay, tighter economic sanctions is one possibility, but frankly, we've tried that, and it hasn't really worked," Feffer said. "But negotiations, well, they have worked, and [they] worked in 1994, even worked during the George W. Bush administration with the six-party talks. Both of those agreements led to effective freezes and even some dismantlement of North Korea's nuclear capability. So that's the no-brainer as far as I'm concerned, it's just a question of whether the Trump administration comes to that realization as well."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.