SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"There's a darkness spreading over Washington these days, and it might be time for everyone in the news media who cares about democracy to confront it," wrote the Baltimore Sun's David Zurawik. (Photo: Reuters)
"This is not how an elected government behaves in a true democracy."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause
The Trump administration sparked backlash once more from journalists and activists on Wednesday by continuing the "disturbing trend" of prohibiting audio and video recordings of the daily press briefing, a move that prompted many to call for more pushback from journalists and media outlets.
Some urged members of the White House press corps to boycott any briefings that did not permit audio or video, while others argued that journalists should rebel by recording briefings on their phones.
\u201cAnd today's WH press briefing is off-camera. So, media folks, be bold and turn the cameras (or your phones) on and record. Or don't go.\u201d— Barbara Morrill (@Barbara Morrill) 1498656747
\u201cPeople whose limbs don\u2019t work are standing up and fighting this administration while too much of the press rolls over & exposes its belly https://t.co/vmLITtusi0\u201d— Dana Houle (@Dana Houle) 1498675582
\u201cObscene how journalists "can't" take the risk of recording press conferences while protesters risk arrest in GOP offices across the country.\u201d— Samuel Sinyangwe (@Samuel Sinyangwe) 1498676460
CNN reporter Jim Acosta, highlighting the Trump administration's "near-total refusal" to take questions from anyone associated with his network, posted a picture from the press briefing on Monday, with the caption: "Video of this has been banned by the USA."
Author and historian Kevin Kruse responded:
\u201c@Acosta No, it was banned by the current presidential administration.\n\nThe USA still has the First Amendment, if you'd like to make full use of it.\u201d— Jim Acosta (@Jim Acosta) 1498674310
In a recent column for the Baltimore Sun, media critic David Zurawik echoed these calls for members of the White House press corps--and members of the media more broadly--to resist the Trump administration's blatant attempt to interfere with the freedom of the press.
"There's a darkness spreading over Washington these days, and it might be time for everyone in the news media who cares about democracy to confront it," Zurawik wrote. "You can only talk to a bully so long before you have to act. Maybe it's time for such collective action again in taking an administration to school."
Following Tuesday's press briefing--during which Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was confronted by Playboy reporter Brian Karem for her "inflammatory" attacks on the media--Zurawik argued it is "past time" for someone to stand up to the White House.
"Will someone, anyone, step up and end these distressing displays of White House dysfunction and disregard for the obligation of the presidency to provide citizens with some sense of truthful information and accountability?" he wrote.
GQ's Jack Moore offered similar advice, writing: "This is a scary time. It's a crisis. The least you can do is turn your camera on."
In a statement on Tuesday, the progressive watchdog group Common Cause estimated that "there have been only five on camera briefings by White House press officials during the entire month of June."
"This is not how an elected government behaves in a true democracy," concluded Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn. "Hiding behind the bully pulpit is a cowardly act far beneath the dignity of the office of the president.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"This is not how an elected government behaves in a true democracy."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause
The Trump administration sparked backlash once more from journalists and activists on Wednesday by continuing the "disturbing trend" of prohibiting audio and video recordings of the daily press briefing, a move that prompted many to call for more pushback from journalists and media outlets.
Some urged members of the White House press corps to boycott any briefings that did not permit audio or video, while others argued that journalists should rebel by recording briefings on their phones.
\u201cAnd today's WH press briefing is off-camera. So, media folks, be bold and turn the cameras (or your phones) on and record. Or don't go.\u201d— Barbara Morrill (@Barbara Morrill) 1498656747
\u201cPeople whose limbs don\u2019t work are standing up and fighting this administration while too much of the press rolls over & exposes its belly https://t.co/vmLITtusi0\u201d— Dana Houle (@Dana Houle) 1498675582
\u201cObscene how journalists "can't" take the risk of recording press conferences while protesters risk arrest in GOP offices across the country.\u201d— Samuel Sinyangwe (@Samuel Sinyangwe) 1498676460
CNN reporter Jim Acosta, highlighting the Trump administration's "near-total refusal" to take questions from anyone associated with his network, posted a picture from the press briefing on Monday, with the caption: "Video of this has been banned by the USA."
Author and historian Kevin Kruse responded:
\u201c@Acosta No, it was banned by the current presidential administration.\n\nThe USA still has the First Amendment, if you'd like to make full use of it.\u201d— Jim Acosta (@Jim Acosta) 1498674310
In a recent column for the Baltimore Sun, media critic David Zurawik echoed these calls for members of the White House press corps--and members of the media more broadly--to resist the Trump administration's blatant attempt to interfere with the freedom of the press.
"There's a darkness spreading over Washington these days, and it might be time for everyone in the news media who cares about democracy to confront it," Zurawik wrote. "You can only talk to a bully so long before you have to act. Maybe it's time for such collective action again in taking an administration to school."
Following Tuesday's press briefing--during which Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was confronted by Playboy reporter Brian Karem for her "inflammatory" attacks on the media--Zurawik argued it is "past time" for someone to stand up to the White House.
"Will someone, anyone, step up and end these distressing displays of White House dysfunction and disregard for the obligation of the presidency to provide citizens with some sense of truthful information and accountability?" he wrote.
GQ's Jack Moore offered similar advice, writing: "This is a scary time. It's a crisis. The least you can do is turn your camera on."
In a statement on Tuesday, the progressive watchdog group Common Cause estimated that "there have been only five on camera briefings by White House press officials during the entire month of June."
"This is not how an elected government behaves in a true democracy," concluded Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn. "Hiding behind the bully pulpit is a cowardly act far beneath the dignity of the office of the president.
"This is not how an elected government behaves in a true democracy."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause
The Trump administration sparked backlash once more from journalists and activists on Wednesday by continuing the "disturbing trend" of prohibiting audio and video recordings of the daily press briefing, a move that prompted many to call for more pushback from journalists and media outlets.
Some urged members of the White House press corps to boycott any briefings that did not permit audio or video, while others argued that journalists should rebel by recording briefings on their phones.
\u201cAnd today's WH press briefing is off-camera. So, media folks, be bold and turn the cameras (or your phones) on and record. Or don't go.\u201d— Barbara Morrill (@Barbara Morrill) 1498656747
\u201cPeople whose limbs don\u2019t work are standing up and fighting this administration while too much of the press rolls over & exposes its belly https://t.co/vmLITtusi0\u201d— Dana Houle (@Dana Houle) 1498675582
\u201cObscene how journalists "can't" take the risk of recording press conferences while protesters risk arrest in GOP offices across the country.\u201d— Samuel Sinyangwe (@Samuel Sinyangwe) 1498676460
CNN reporter Jim Acosta, highlighting the Trump administration's "near-total refusal" to take questions from anyone associated with his network, posted a picture from the press briefing on Monday, with the caption: "Video of this has been banned by the USA."
Author and historian Kevin Kruse responded:
\u201c@Acosta No, it was banned by the current presidential administration.\n\nThe USA still has the First Amendment, if you'd like to make full use of it.\u201d— Jim Acosta (@Jim Acosta) 1498674310
In a recent column for the Baltimore Sun, media critic David Zurawik echoed these calls for members of the White House press corps--and members of the media more broadly--to resist the Trump administration's blatant attempt to interfere with the freedom of the press.
"There's a darkness spreading over Washington these days, and it might be time for everyone in the news media who cares about democracy to confront it," Zurawik wrote. "You can only talk to a bully so long before you have to act. Maybe it's time for such collective action again in taking an administration to school."
Following Tuesday's press briefing--during which Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders was confronted by Playboy reporter Brian Karem for her "inflammatory" attacks on the media--Zurawik argued it is "past time" for someone to stand up to the White House.
"Will someone, anyone, step up and end these distressing displays of White House dysfunction and disregard for the obligation of the presidency to provide citizens with some sense of truthful information and accountability?" he wrote.
GQ's Jack Moore offered similar advice, writing: "This is a scary time. It's a crisis. The least you can do is turn your camera on."
In a statement on Tuesday, the progressive watchdog group Common Cause estimated that "there have been only five on camera briefings by White House press officials during the entire month of June."
"This is not how an elected government behaves in a true democracy," concluded Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn. "Hiding behind the bully pulpit is a cowardly act far beneath the dignity of the office of the president.