SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Assange: CIA Director Sets 'Disturbing Precedent' with Threats Against WikiLeaks
In wide-ranging interview with Intercept journalist Jeremy Scahill, Assange responds to CIA director's characterization of WikiLeaks as "hostile non-state intelligence service"
Apr 19, 2017
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange responded to CIA director Mike Pompeo's characterization of WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency" and other remarks in an interview with journalist Jeremy Scahill, released Wednesday on Scahill's Intercepted podcast.
Although he said he "quite liked the phrase" Pompeo used, Assange said the CIA director betrayed his lack of leadership skills and spoke outside the bounds of his role when he declared that the whistleblowing organization had launched an assault on the First Amendment after it published a trove of intelligence documents that exposed yet more mass surveillance programs and plans to circumvent privacy apps such as Signal and WhatsApp.
Pompeo's speech last week at the Washington, D.C. think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies "put the CIA in a position where they looked like they were frightened and worried that we were the better intelligence service," Assange told Scahill from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has lived in asylum since 2012.
CIA directors "should have gravitas," not engage in "pompous name-calling," he continued. "That's not what intelligence services should be about."
As Glenn Greenwald reported at the time:
[President Donald] Trump's CIA director stood up in public and explicitly threatened to targetfree speech rights and press freedoms, and it was almost impossible to find even a single U.S. mainstream journalist expressing objections or alarm, because the targets Pompeo chose in this instance are ones they dislike--much the way that many are willing to overlook or even sanction free speech repression if the targeted ideas or speakers are sufficiently unpopular.
In the wide-ranging interview, Assange also noted the irony of Trump praising WikiLeaks during the campaign--when it was releasing emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton's former chairman John Podesta--and criticizing it during his presidency after the organization published the Vault 7 files exposing more CIA mass surveillance documents.
During his speech to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Pompeo made reference to the CIA "shutting down" WikiLeaks, which Assange told Scahill amounted to a threat.
"So how does he propose to conduct this ending? He didn't say," Assange said. "But the CIA is only in the business of collecting information, kidnapping people, and assassinating people. So, it's quite a menacing statement that he does need to clarify."
"The reason why...Pompeo is launching this attack, is because he knows we're in this series exposing all sorts of illegal actions by the CIA," Assange continued. Pompeo is "trying to get ahead of the publicity curve and create a preemptive defense."
Moreover, it's the climate of public debate that keeps governments from becoming authoritarian, Assange continued. "For the head of the CIA to pronounce what the boundaries are, of reporting or not reporting--is a very disturbing precedent," he said. "The head of the CIA determining who is a publisher, who's not a publisher, who's a journalist, who's not a journalist, is totally out of line."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange responded to CIA director Mike Pompeo's characterization of WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency" and other remarks in an interview with journalist Jeremy Scahill, released Wednesday on Scahill's Intercepted podcast.
Although he said he "quite liked the phrase" Pompeo used, Assange said the CIA director betrayed his lack of leadership skills and spoke outside the bounds of his role when he declared that the whistleblowing organization had launched an assault on the First Amendment after it published a trove of intelligence documents that exposed yet more mass surveillance programs and plans to circumvent privacy apps such as Signal and WhatsApp.
Pompeo's speech last week at the Washington, D.C. think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies "put the CIA in a position where they looked like they were frightened and worried that we were the better intelligence service," Assange told Scahill from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has lived in asylum since 2012.
CIA directors "should have gravitas," not engage in "pompous name-calling," he continued. "That's not what intelligence services should be about."
As Glenn Greenwald reported at the time:
[President Donald] Trump's CIA director stood up in public and explicitly threatened to targetfree speech rights and press freedoms, and it was almost impossible to find even a single U.S. mainstream journalist expressing objections or alarm, because the targets Pompeo chose in this instance are ones they dislike--much the way that many are willing to overlook or even sanction free speech repression if the targeted ideas or speakers are sufficiently unpopular.
In the wide-ranging interview, Assange also noted the irony of Trump praising WikiLeaks during the campaign--when it was releasing emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton's former chairman John Podesta--and criticizing it during his presidency after the organization published the Vault 7 files exposing more CIA mass surveillance documents.
During his speech to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Pompeo made reference to the CIA "shutting down" WikiLeaks, which Assange told Scahill amounted to a threat.
"So how does he propose to conduct this ending? He didn't say," Assange said. "But the CIA is only in the business of collecting information, kidnapping people, and assassinating people. So, it's quite a menacing statement that he does need to clarify."
"The reason why...Pompeo is launching this attack, is because he knows we're in this series exposing all sorts of illegal actions by the CIA," Assange continued. Pompeo is "trying to get ahead of the publicity curve and create a preemptive defense."
Moreover, it's the climate of public debate that keeps governments from becoming authoritarian, Assange continued. "For the head of the CIA to pronounce what the boundaries are, of reporting or not reporting--is a very disturbing precedent," he said. "The head of the CIA determining who is a publisher, who's not a publisher, who's a journalist, who's not a journalist, is totally out of line."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange responded to CIA director Mike Pompeo's characterization of WikiLeaks as a "hostile non-state intelligence agency" and other remarks in an interview with journalist Jeremy Scahill, released Wednesday on Scahill's Intercepted podcast.
Although he said he "quite liked the phrase" Pompeo used, Assange said the CIA director betrayed his lack of leadership skills and spoke outside the bounds of his role when he declared that the whistleblowing organization had launched an assault on the First Amendment after it published a trove of intelligence documents that exposed yet more mass surveillance programs and plans to circumvent privacy apps such as Signal and WhatsApp.
Pompeo's speech last week at the Washington, D.C. think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies "put the CIA in a position where they looked like they were frightened and worried that we were the better intelligence service," Assange told Scahill from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has lived in asylum since 2012.
CIA directors "should have gravitas," not engage in "pompous name-calling," he continued. "That's not what intelligence services should be about."
As Glenn Greenwald reported at the time:
[President Donald] Trump's CIA director stood up in public and explicitly threatened to targetfree speech rights and press freedoms, and it was almost impossible to find even a single U.S. mainstream journalist expressing objections or alarm, because the targets Pompeo chose in this instance are ones they dislike--much the way that many are willing to overlook or even sanction free speech repression if the targeted ideas or speakers are sufficiently unpopular.
In the wide-ranging interview, Assange also noted the irony of Trump praising WikiLeaks during the campaign--when it was releasing emails from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton's former chairman John Podesta--and criticizing it during his presidency after the organization published the Vault 7 files exposing more CIA mass surveillance documents.
During his speech to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Pompeo made reference to the CIA "shutting down" WikiLeaks, which Assange told Scahill amounted to a threat.
"So how does he propose to conduct this ending? He didn't say," Assange said. "But the CIA is only in the business of collecting information, kidnapping people, and assassinating people. So, it's quite a menacing statement that he does need to clarify."
"The reason why...Pompeo is launching this attack, is because he knows we're in this series exposing all sorts of illegal actions by the CIA," Assange continued. Pompeo is "trying to get ahead of the publicity curve and create a preemptive defense."
Moreover, it's the climate of public debate that keeps governments from becoming authoritarian, Assange continued. "For the head of the CIA to pronounce what the boundaries are, of reporting or not reporting--is a very disturbing precedent," he said. "The head of the CIA determining who is a publisher, who's not a publisher, who's a journalist, who's not a journalist, is totally out of line."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.