

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Trump administration may have come up with "a way to get around" the tradition of bipartisan representation on federal commissions, the Huffington Post reported Wednesday, raising alarm that those panels could end up "being stacked with nominees sympathetic to the president."
The workaround could impact critical commissions including those governing election law (the Federal Election Commission, or FEC); financial regulation (the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC); and the internet (the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC).
According to HuffPo reporters Sam Stein and Ryan Grim:
By statute, these five- and six-member commissions can have no more than three members from the majority party. For six-member commissions, that assures bipartisan cooperation--or, as has happened at the FEC, utter gridlock. The narrow majority on five-member commissions requires a commission to govern closer to the center. A chair who loses just one vote from his or her own party loses everything.
Historically, the White House has largely deferred to Senate committees in naming a commission's minority party members. The nominees are then sent to the Senate as a pair as a means of expediting their confirmation.
But Democratic sources on the Hill worry that the Trump administration has conceived of a way to get around these norms. Although it can't stack commissions with more Republicans, it can replace Democrats with registered Independents who are ideologically conservative. One counsel to a Senate Democrat said the administration "may actually be able to do this legally." Others cautioned, that it's not yet clear if Trump will go down this path.
The New York Times similarly suggested last month that Trump may pursue this strategy, writing of the process to replace FEC commissioner Ann Ravel: "By tradition, Senate Democrats would be allowed to select the replacement, but, by law, the choice belongs to the president, and Mr. Trump has shown little interest in Washington customs."
The Times spoke to Richard L. Hasen, an election law scholar at the University of California, Irvine, who agreed that "Trump can pick a nominee himself so long as he does not choose a registered Republican."
According to the Times:
Mr. Hasen said he would not be surprised if Mr. Trump made the pick himself, especially because his White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, was an election commissioner himself and has pushed fiercely for deregulating campaign finance.
"It would be transformative," Mr. Hasen said, if the president nominated someone more aligned with the panel's Republican members to push for even further deregulation.
Stein and Grim report that Trump on Tuesday pulled at least two pending nominees from various commissions, further indicating that the White House is looking to shake up the system.
Journalist and author David Dayen called the news a "huge deal," saying: "I thought a big push was needed to get [Senate Minority Leader Chuck] Schumer [N.Y.] to put forward decent commission candidates. But Trump could cut him out entirely."
"[I]f the goal, as [White House chief strategist Steve] Bannon says, is 'deconstructing the administrative state' this would be a quick way to do it," Stein added on Twitter. Bannon said as much during an address to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last month, as Common Dreams reported.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Trump administration may have come up with "a way to get around" the tradition of bipartisan representation on federal commissions, the Huffington Post reported Wednesday, raising alarm that those panels could end up "being stacked with nominees sympathetic to the president."
The workaround could impact critical commissions including those governing election law (the Federal Election Commission, or FEC); financial regulation (the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC); and the internet (the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC).
According to HuffPo reporters Sam Stein and Ryan Grim:
By statute, these five- and six-member commissions can have no more than three members from the majority party. For six-member commissions, that assures bipartisan cooperation--or, as has happened at the FEC, utter gridlock. The narrow majority on five-member commissions requires a commission to govern closer to the center. A chair who loses just one vote from his or her own party loses everything.
Historically, the White House has largely deferred to Senate committees in naming a commission's minority party members. The nominees are then sent to the Senate as a pair as a means of expediting their confirmation.
But Democratic sources on the Hill worry that the Trump administration has conceived of a way to get around these norms. Although it can't stack commissions with more Republicans, it can replace Democrats with registered Independents who are ideologically conservative. One counsel to a Senate Democrat said the administration "may actually be able to do this legally." Others cautioned, that it's not yet clear if Trump will go down this path.
The New York Times similarly suggested last month that Trump may pursue this strategy, writing of the process to replace FEC commissioner Ann Ravel: "By tradition, Senate Democrats would be allowed to select the replacement, but, by law, the choice belongs to the president, and Mr. Trump has shown little interest in Washington customs."
The Times spoke to Richard L. Hasen, an election law scholar at the University of California, Irvine, who agreed that "Trump can pick a nominee himself so long as he does not choose a registered Republican."
According to the Times:
Mr. Hasen said he would not be surprised if Mr. Trump made the pick himself, especially because his White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, was an election commissioner himself and has pushed fiercely for deregulating campaign finance.
"It would be transformative," Mr. Hasen said, if the president nominated someone more aligned with the panel's Republican members to push for even further deregulation.
Stein and Grim report that Trump on Tuesday pulled at least two pending nominees from various commissions, further indicating that the White House is looking to shake up the system.
Journalist and author David Dayen called the news a "huge deal," saying: "I thought a big push was needed to get [Senate Minority Leader Chuck] Schumer [N.Y.] to put forward decent commission candidates. But Trump could cut him out entirely."
"[I]f the goal, as [White House chief strategist Steve] Bannon says, is 'deconstructing the administrative state' this would be a quick way to do it," Stein added on Twitter. Bannon said as much during an address to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last month, as Common Dreams reported.
The Trump administration may have come up with "a way to get around" the tradition of bipartisan representation on federal commissions, the Huffington Post reported Wednesday, raising alarm that those panels could end up "being stacked with nominees sympathetic to the president."
The workaround could impact critical commissions including those governing election law (the Federal Election Commission, or FEC); financial regulation (the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC); and the internet (the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC).
According to HuffPo reporters Sam Stein and Ryan Grim:
By statute, these five- and six-member commissions can have no more than three members from the majority party. For six-member commissions, that assures bipartisan cooperation--or, as has happened at the FEC, utter gridlock. The narrow majority on five-member commissions requires a commission to govern closer to the center. A chair who loses just one vote from his or her own party loses everything.
Historically, the White House has largely deferred to Senate committees in naming a commission's minority party members. The nominees are then sent to the Senate as a pair as a means of expediting their confirmation.
But Democratic sources on the Hill worry that the Trump administration has conceived of a way to get around these norms. Although it can't stack commissions with more Republicans, it can replace Democrats with registered Independents who are ideologically conservative. One counsel to a Senate Democrat said the administration "may actually be able to do this legally." Others cautioned, that it's not yet clear if Trump will go down this path.
The New York Times similarly suggested last month that Trump may pursue this strategy, writing of the process to replace FEC commissioner Ann Ravel: "By tradition, Senate Democrats would be allowed to select the replacement, but, by law, the choice belongs to the president, and Mr. Trump has shown little interest in Washington customs."
The Times spoke to Richard L. Hasen, an election law scholar at the University of California, Irvine, who agreed that "Trump can pick a nominee himself so long as he does not choose a registered Republican."
According to the Times:
Mr. Hasen said he would not be surprised if Mr. Trump made the pick himself, especially because his White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, was an election commissioner himself and has pushed fiercely for deregulating campaign finance.
"It would be transformative," Mr. Hasen said, if the president nominated someone more aligned with the panel's Republican members to push for even further deregulation.
Stein and Grim report that Trump on Tuesday pulled at least two pending nominees from various commissions, further indicating that the White House is looking to shake up the system.
Journalist and author David Dayen called the news a "huge deal," saying: "I thought a big push was needed to get [Senate Minority Leader Chuck] Schumer [N.Y.] to put forward decent commission candidates. But Trump could cut him out entirely."
"[I]f the goal, as [White House chief strategist Steve] Bannon says, is 'deconstructing the administrative state' this would be a quick way to do it," Stein added on Twitter. Bannon said as much during an address to the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last month, as Common Dreams reported.