The Democrats' plan aims to rebuild America's infrastructure--without massive giveaways to big developers and investors. (Photo: Thomas Hawk/flickr/cc)
Jan 24, 2017
With a $1 trillion infrastructure plan unveiled Tuesday, Senate Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are offering President Donald Trump an opportunity to make good on a major campaign promise--without giving away billions to private corporations in the process.
The sweeping proposal (pdf), which proponents claim would create 15 million jobs, focuses on repairing the nation's "crumbling roads and bridges," upgrading local water and sewer systems, replacing and expanding existing rail and bus systems, rebuilding schools, and expanding high-speed broadband in unserved and underserved areas, among other priorities. The plan would reportedly "rely on direct federal spending," as the Washington Postreports, and be paid for by closing unspecified tax loopholes.
The blueprint lays down the gauntlet to both Trump--who campaigned on a promise to implement such an infrastructure program, but whose plan for doing so amounts to what former Labor Secretary Robert Reich calls "a giant public subsidy to developers and investors"--and congressional Republicans, who have resisted attempts to allocate federal dollars to such national improvement projects.
The Post reports:
Eager to drive a wedge between the new president and congressional Republicans, Democrats consider talk of infrastructure projects as a way to piggyback on Trump's frequent vows to repair the nation's crumbling roads and bridges and persuade him to adopt ideas that would put him at odds with GOP leaders, who have done little to embrace what would amount to a major new government spending program.
Advisers to Trump have said they would rely on federal tax credits and public-private partnerships rather than federal spending to pay for a new infrastructure program.
But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters on Tuesday: "We will not support tax credits for developers."
"In other words, they're happy to work with Trump--but on their terms, not his," Voxwrote.
As Sanders declared in a statement: "President Trump campaigned on rebuilding the infrastructure. Let's do it, but let's do it in a way that does not provide huge tax breaks to the wealthiest people in this country and to the largest corporations."
For Reich, "the only way we get that is if corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes." Troublingly, Trump spent Monday and Tuesday telling business executives that "massive" corporate tax cuts were on the horizon.
Here, Reich explains what's wrong with Trump's plan:
\u201cIn Trump's "private-public" partnerships, private investors get rich and the public gets shafted. https://t.co/SAZ2tNqqyC\u201d— Robert Reich (@Robert Reich) 1484939480
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
With a $1 trillion infrastructure plan unveiled Tuesday, Senate Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are offering President Donald Trump an opportunity to make good on a major campaign promise--without giving away billions to private corporations in the process.
The sweeping proposal (pdf), which proponents claim would create 15 million jobs, focuses on repairing the nation's "crumbling roads and bridges," upgrading local water and sewer systems, replacing and expanding existing rail and bus systems, rebuilding schools, and expanding high-speed broadband in unserved and underserved areas, among other priorities. The plan would reportedly "rely on direct federal spending," as the Washington Postreports, and be paid for by closing unspecified tax loopholes.
The blueprint lays down the gauntlet to both Trump--who campaigned on a promise to implement such an infrastructure program, but whose plan for doing so amounts to what former Labor Secretary Robert Reich calls "a giant public subsidy to developers and investors"--and congressional Republicans, who have resisted attempts to allocate federal dollars to such national improvement projects.
The Post reports:
Eager to drive a wedge between the new president and congressional Republicans, Democrats consider talk of infrastructure projects as a way to piggyback on Trump's frequent vows to repair the nation's crumbling roads and bridges and persuade him to adopt ideas that would put him at odds with GOP leaders, who have done little to embrace what would amount to a major new government spending program.
Advisers to Trump have said they would rely on federal tax credits and public-private partnerships rather than federal spending to pay for a new infrastructure program.
But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters on Tuesday: "We will not support tax credits for developers."
"In other words, they're happy to work with Trump--but on their terms, not his," Voxwrote.
As Sanders declared in a statement: "President Trump campaigned on rebuilding the infrastructure. Let's do it, but let's do it in a way that does not provide huge tax breaks to the wealthiest people in this country and to the largest corporations."
For Reich, "the only way we get that is if corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes." Troublingly, Trump spent Monday and Tuesday telling business executives that "massive" corporate tax cuts were on the horizon.
Here, Reich explains what's wrong with Trump's plan:
\u201cIn Trump's "private-public" partnerships, private investors get rich and the public gets shafted. https://t.co/SAZ2tNqqyC\u201d— Robert Reich (@Robert Reich) 1484939480
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
With a $1 trillion infrastructure plan unveiled Tuesday, Senate Democrats and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) are offering President Donald Trump an opportunity to make good on a major campaign promise--without giving away billions to private corporations in the process.
The sweeping proposal (pdf), which proponents claim would create 15 million jobs, focuses on repairing the nation's "crumbling roads and bridges," upgrading local water and sewer systems, replacing and expanding existing rail and bus systems, rebuilding schools, and expanding high-speed broadband in unserved and underserved areas, among other priorities. The plan would reportedly "rely on direct federal spending," as the Washington Postreports, and be paid for by closing unspecified tax loopholes.
The blueprint lays down the gauntlet to both Trump--who campaigned on a promise to implement such an infrastructure program, but whose plan for doing so amounts to what former Labor Secretary Robert Reich calls "a giant public subsidy to developers and investors"--and congressional Republicans, who have resisted attempts to allocate federal dollars to such national improvement projects.
The Post reports:
Eager to drive a wedge between the new president and congressional Republicans, Democrats consider talk of infrastructure projects as a way to piggyback on Trump's frequent vows to repair the nation's crumbling roads and bridges and persuade him to adopt ideas that would put him at odds with GOP leaders, who have done little to embrace what would amount to a major new government spending program.
Advisers to Trump have said they would rely on federal tax credits and public-private partnerships rather than federal spending to pay for a new infrastructure program.
But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) told reporters on Tuesday: "We will not support tax credits for developers."
"In other words, they're happy to work with Trump--but on their terms, not his," Voxwrote.
As Sanders declared in a statement: "President Trump campaigned on rebuilding the infrastructure. Let's do it, but let's do it in a way that does not provide huge tax breaks to the wealthiest people in this country and to the largest corporations."
For Reich, "the only way we get that is if corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes." Troublingly, Trump spent Monday and Tuesday telling business executives that "massive" corporate tax cuts were on the horizon.
Here, Reich explains what's wrong with Trump's plan:
\u201cIn Trump's "private-public" partnerships, private investors get rich and the public gets shafted. https://t.co/SAZ2tNqqyC\u201d— Robert Reich (@Robert Reich) 1484939480
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.