SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
CIA Pick Mike Pompeo Open to Re-Authorizing Torture
Kansas Rep. and Tea Party hawk says he would 'consult with experts' on efficacy of waterboarding and mass surveillance
Jan 23, 2017
Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), the nominee for CIA chief whose confirmation vote is set for Monday, has said he would consider re-authorizing waterboarding and other forms of torture.
In a series of written responses (pdf) to questions from the Senate Intelligence Committee, who asked if he would refrain from renewing "waterboarding or any other enhanced interrogation techniques," Pompeo wrote that he would "consult with experts" on any changes to the Army Field Manual, including in regard to "treatment and interrogation of individuals."
"I would expect to consult with the full Congressional Intelligence Committees on any differences that are appropriate, including any changes to law that would be required," he wrote. "If experts believed current law was an impediment to gathering vital intelligence to protect the country, I would want to understand such impediments and whether any recommendations were appropriate for changing current law."
Pompeo has also previously described CIA staff who waterboarded detainees as "patriots."
Human rights groups used Pompeo's answers, as well as his track record of support for mass surveillance, to call on senators to reject his nomination.
"Pompeo's responses to questions about torture and mass surveillance are dangerously ambiguous about whether he would endorse abusive practices and seek to subvert existing legal protections," said Maria McFarland Sanchez-Moreno, U.S. program co-director at Human Rights Watch (HRW), in a statement Saturday.
"Pompeo's failure to unequivocally disavow torture and mass surveillance, coupled with his record of advocacy for surveillance of Americans and past endorsement of the shuttered CIA torture program, make clear that he should not be running the CIA," she said.
In his response, Pompeo--who voted for the USA Freedom Act that effectively ended the collection of metadata, which reveals information such as time, place, and duration of phone calls--also indicated that he would resurrect the program "if....agency officials inform me they believe the current programs and legal framework are insufficient to protect the country."
His responses mean the Senate's vote Monday will be a question of principle, as The Intercept's Zaid Jilani puts it. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), for one, has vowed to "strongly" oppose him, as his nomination comes "at a time of massive attacks on privacy."
Pompeo was originally slated for a confirmation vote Friday, but a group of Democrats, led by Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon--who serves on the intelligence committee--objected to the date as it coincided with President Donald Trump's swearing-in ceremony.
"No CIA director in history has ever been confirmed on Inauguration Day," the Democrats wrote in a statement. "The importance of the position of CIA director, especially in these dangerous times, demands that the nomination be thoroughly vetted, questioned, and debated."
Over the weekend, Trump indicated that he might seek to loosen torture restrictions, saying in a meeting with intelligence officials, "We haven't used the abilities we've got. We've been restrained."
Pompeo's confirmation vote is scheduled for 6:00pm Monday.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), the nominee for CIA chief whose confirmation vote is set for Monday, has said he would consider re-authorizing waterboarding and other forms of torture.
In a series of written responses (pdf) to questions from the Senate Intelligence Committee, who asked if he would refrain from renewing "waterboarding or any other enhanced interrogation techniques," Pompeo wrote that he would "consult with experts" on any changes to the Army Field Manual, including in regard to "treatment and interrogation of individuals."
"I would expect to consult with the full Congressional Intelligence Committees on any differences that are appropriate, including any changes to law that would be required," he wrote. "If experts believed current law was an impediment to gathering vital intelligence to protect the country, I would want to understand such impediments and whether any recommendations were appropriate for changing current law."
Pompeo has also previously described CIA staff who waterboarded detainees as "patriots."
Human rights groups used Pompeo's answers, as well as his track record of support for mass surveillance, to call on senators to reject his nomination.
"Pompeo's responses to questions about torture and mass surveillance are dangerously ambiguous about whether he would endorse abusive practices and seek to subvert existing legal protections," said Maria McFarland Sanchez-Moreno, U.S. program co-director at Human Rights Watch (HRW), in a statement Saturday.
"Pompeo's failure to unequivocally disavow torture and mass surveillance, coupled with his record of advocacy for surveillance of Americans and past endorsement of the shuttered CIA torture program, make clear that he should not be running the CIA," she said.
In his response, Pompeo--who voted for the USA Freedom Act that effectively ended the collection of metadata, which reveals information such as time, place, and duration of phone calls--also indicated that he would resurrect the program "if....agency officials inform me they believe the current programs and legal framework are insufficient to protect the country."
His responses mean the Senate's vote Monday will be a question of principle, as The Intercept's Zaid Jilani puts it. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), for one, has vowed to "strongly" oppose him, as his nomination comes "at a time of massive attacks on privacy."
Pompeo was originally slated for a confirmation vote Friday, but a group of Democrats, led by Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon--who serves on the intelligence committee--objected to the date as it coincided with President Donald Trump's swearing-in ceremony.
"No CIA director in history has ever been confirmed on Inauguration Day," the Democrats wrote in a statement. "The importance of the position of CIA director, especially in these dangerous times, demands that the nomination be thoroughly vetted, questioned, and debated."
Over the weekend, Trump indicated that he might seek to loosen torture restrictions, saying in a meeting with intelligence officials, "We haven't used the abilities we've got. We've been restrained."
Pompeo's confirmation vote is scheduled for 6:00pm Monday.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.), the nominee for CIA chief whose confirmation vote is set for Monday, has said he would consider re-authorizing waterboarding and other forms of torture.
In a series of written responses (pdf) to questions from the Senate Intelligence Committee, who asked if he would refrain from renewing "waterboarding or any other enhanced interrogation techniques," Pompeo wrote that he would "consult with experts" on any changes to the Army Field Manual, including in regard to "treatment and interrogation of individuals."
"I would expect to consult with the full Congressional Intelligence Committees on any differences that are appropriate, including any changes to law that would be required," he wrote. "If experts believed current law was an impediment to gathering vital intelligence to protect the country, I would want to understand such impediments and whether any recommendations were appropriate for changing current law."
Pompeo has also previously described CIA staff who waterboarded detainees as "patriots."
Human rights groups used Pompeo's answers, as well as his track record of support for mass surveillance, to call on senators to reject his nomination.
"Pompeo's responses to questions about torture and mass surveillance are dangerously ambiguous about whether he would endorse abusive practices and seek to subvert existing legal protections," said Maria McFarland Sanchez-Moreno, U.S. program co-director at Human Rights Watch (HRW), in a statement Saturday.
"Pompeo's failure to unequivocally disavow torture and mass surveillance, coupled with his record of advocacy for surveillance of Americans and past endorsement of the shuttered CIA torture program, make clear that he should not be running the CIA," she said.
In his response, Pompeo--who voted for the USA Freedom Act that effectively ended the collection of metadata, which reveals information such as time, place, and duration of phone calls--also indicated that he would resurrect the program "if....agency officials inform me they believe the current programs and legal framework are insufficient to protect the country."
His responses mean the Senate's vote Monday will be a question of principle, as The Intercept's Zaid Jilani puts it. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), for one, has vowed to "strongly" oppose him, as his nomination comes "at a time of massive attacks on privacy."
Pompeo was originally slated for a confirmation vote Friday, but a group of Democrats, led by Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon--who serves on the intelligence committee--objected to the date as it coincided with President Donald Trump's swearing-in ceremony.
"No CIA director in history has ever been confirmed on Inauguration Day," the Democrats wrote in a statement. "The importance of the position of CIA director, especially in these dangerous times, demands that the nomination be thoroughly vetted, questioned, and debated."
Over the weekend, Trump indicated that he might seek to loosen torture restrictions, saying in a meeting with intelligence officials, "We haven't used the abilities we've got. We've been restrained."
Pompeo's confirmation vote is scheduled for 6:00pm Monday.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.