Beyond this latest tirade, observers are noting how the president-elect's use of Twitter to spread misinformation may have dangerous implications within a Trump presidency. (Photo: Frankie Leon/cc/flickr)
Nov 28, 2016
With attention on recount efforts in several swing states, President-elect Donald Trump late Sunday claimed, without proof, that "millions of people...voted illegally."
Trump wrote on Twitter that "serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California" cost him the popular vote, though current tabulations estimate that Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is ahead by nearly 2 million votes.
\u201cIn addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1480278643
During the rant, Trump argues that his campaign strategy of visiting many small states would have made it "much easier" for him to "win the so-called popular vote than the Electoral College," where he is currently ahead of Clinton 290-232.
"There's no reason to believe this is true," said Rick Hasen, blogger at the Election Law Blog and professor specializing in election law at the University of California, Irvine.
"The level of fraud in U.S. elections is quite low," Hasen noted, adding that, in particular, "the problem of non-citizen voting is quite small--like we're talking claims in the dozens, we're not talking voting in the millions, or the thousands, or even the hundred."
Fact-checking website Politifact also ruled Trump's assertion false.
While it is not the first time the president-elect has made unsubstantiated claims about the validity of the U.S. electoral process, this one came after it was announced that the Clinton campaign was joining the recount efforts spearheaded by Green Party leader Jill Stein. A recount is currently underway in Wisconsin, while Stein is expected to file in Pennsylvania and Michigan, as well, which have deadlines of Monday and Wednesday, respectively.
Noting the irony of Trump's claims, Clinton campaign attorney Marc E. Elias wrote on Twitter:
Beyond this latest tirade, observers are noting how the president-elect's use of Twitter to spread misinformation may have dangerous implications under a Trump presidency.
As T.C. Sottek, managing editor at The Verge wrote Sunday, "this is just one false claim of many" as Trump "has used Twitter to tweet and retweet false and misleading information at a volume that has challenged the bandwidth of fact checkers."
"When Trump becomes president," Sottek warned, "his Twitter account won't just be the ramblings of a private citizen--it will be the remarks of the chief executive of the U.S. government. And if his Twitter account is the most open part of his administration, the platform could effectively become the White House press office."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
With attention on recount efforts in several swing states, President-elect Donald Trump late Sunday claimed, without proof, that "millions of people...voted illegally."
Trump wrote on Twitter that "serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California" cost him the popular vote, though current tabulations estimate that Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is ahead by nearly 2 million votes.
\u201cIn addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1480278643
During the rant, Trump argues that his campaign strategy of visiting many small states would have made it "much easier" for him to "win the so-called popular vote than the Electoral College," where he is currently ahead of Clinton 290-232.
"There's no reason to believe this is true," said Rick Hasen, blogger at the Election Law Blog and professor specializing in election law at the University of California, Irvine.
"The level of fraud in U.S. elections is quite low," Hasen noted, adding that, in particular, "the problem of non-citizen voting is quite small--like we're talking claims in the dozens, we're not talking voting in the millions, or the thousands, or even the hundred."
Fact-checking website Politifact also ruled Trump's assertion false.
While it is not the first time the president-elect has made unsubstantiated claims about the validity of the U.S. electoral process, this one came after it was announced that the Clinton campaign was joining the recount efforts spearheaded by Green Party leader Jill Stein. A recount is currently underway in Wisconsin, while Stein is expected to file in Pennsylvania and Michigan, as well, which have deadlines of Monday and Wednesday, respectively.
Noting the irony of Trump's claims, Clinton campaign attorney Marc E. Elias wrote on Twitter:
Beyond this latest tirade, observers are noting how the president-elect's use of Twitter to spread misinformation may have dangerous implications under a Trump presidency.
As T.C. Sottek, managing editor at The Verge wrote Sunday, "this is just one false claim of many" as Trump "has used Twitter to tweet and retweet false and misleading information at a volume that has challenged the bandwidth of fact checkers."
"When Trump becomes president," Sottek warned, "his Twitter account won't just be the ramblings of a private citizen--it will be the remarks of the chief executive of the U.S. government. And if his Twitter account is the most open part of his administration, the platform could effectively become the White House press office."
Lauren McCauley
Lauren McCauley is a former senior editor for Common Dreams covering national and international politics and progressive news. She is now the Editor of Maine Morning Star. Lauren also helped produce a number of documentary films, including the award-winning Soundtrack for a Revolution and The Hollywood Complex, as well as one currently in production about civil rights icon James Meredith. Her writing has been featured on Newsweek, BillMoyers.com, TruthDig, Truthout, In These Times, and Extra! the newsletter of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. She currently lives in Kennebunk, Maine with her husband, two children, a dog, and several chickens.
With attention on recount efforts in several swing states, President-elect Donald Trump late Sunday claimed, without proof, that "millions of people...voted illegally."
Trump wrote on Twitter that "serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California" cost him the popular vote, though current tabulations estimate that Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is ahead by nearly 2 million votes.
\u201cIn addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1480278643
During the rant, Trump argues that his campaign strategy of visiting many small states would have made it "much easier" for him to "win the so-called popular vote than the Electoral College," where he is currently ahead of Clinton 290-232.
"There's no reason to believe this is true," said Rick Hasen, blogger at the Election Law Blog and professor specializing in election law at the University of California, Irvine.
"The level of fraud in U.S. elections is quite low," Hasen noted, adding that, in particular, "the problem of non-citizen voting is quite small--like we're talking claims in the dozens, we're not talking voting in the millions, or the thousands, or even the hundred."
Fact-checking website Politifact also ruled Trump's assertion false.
While it is not the first time the president-elect has made unsubstantiated claims about the validity of the U.S. electoral process, this one came after it was announced that the Clinton campaign was joining the recount efforts spearheaded by Green Party leader Jill Stein. A recount is currently underway in Wisconsin, while Stein is expected to file in Pennsylvania and Michigan, as well, which have deadlines of Monday and Wednesday, respectively.
Noting the irony of Trump's claims, Clinton campaign attorney Marc E. Elias wrote on Twitter:
Beyond this latest tirade, observers are noting how the president-elect's use of Twitter to spread misinformation may have dangerous implications under a Trump presidency.
As T.C. Sottek, managing editor at The Verge wrote Sunday, "this is just one false claim of many" as Trump "has used Twitter to tweet and retweet false and misleading information at a volume that has challenged the bandwidth of fact checkers."
"When Trump becomes president," Sottek warned, "his Twitter account won't just be the ramblings of a private citizen--it will be the remarks of the chief executive of the U.S. government. And if his Twitter account is the most open part of his administration, the platform could effectively become the White House press office."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.