

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Wednesday urged the U.S. Department of Justice to block the proposed AT&T-Time Warner merger, citing the widespread warnings against creating such media empires.
In a letter to the department's antitrust division, Sanders wrote, "This proposed merger is just the latest effort to shrink our media landscape, stifle competition and diversity of content, and provide consumers with less while charging them more."
"This merger represents a gross concentration of power that runs counter to the public good and should be blocked," he said.
News of the potential $85.4 billion acquisition emerged over the weekend, and media watchdogs and democracy groups like Free Press and Common Cause immediately issued warnings against it and urged federal regulators to reject it.

Opponents noted that previous mega-mergers have offset costs of the deals at their customers' expense, notably by charging more for services and implementing data caps, among other measures. And by consolidating a significant amount of media power--Time Warner owns CNN, HBO, and Warner Brothers, among other properties--the merger could discriminate against competitors and harm media diversity.
"Further entrenching monopoly harms innovation and drives up prices for consumers," Common Cause special adviser Michael Copps said on Monday.
Free Press policy director Matt Wood also cautioned, "Big mergers like this inevitably mean higher prices for real people, to pay down the money borrowed to finance these deals and their golden parachutes."
Sanders' letter continued, "The diversity of programing would be further diminished by truncating the relationship of content and distribution. When one giant company owns both the content and the means of distribution, there is a clear disincentive to provide additional choices to consumers."
"The media and telecommunications landscape is changing. It is important that public policy concerns guide these changes, so that we may preserve our democratic discourse and open competitive markets for speech and commerce," he said.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Wednesday urged the U.S. Department of Justice to block the proposed AT&T-Time Warner merger, citing the widespread warnings against creating such media empires.
In a letter to the department's antitrust division, Sanders wrote, "This proposed merger is just the latest effort to shrink our media landscape, stifle competition and diversity of content, and provide consumers with less while charging them more."
"This merger represents a gross concentration of power that runs counter to the public good and should be blocked," he said.
News of the potential $85.4 billion acquisition emerged over the weekend, and media watchdogs and democracy groups like Free Press and Common Cause immediately issued warnings against it and urged federal regulators to reject it.

Opponents noted that previous mega-mergers have offset costs of the deals at their customers' expense, notably by charging more for services and implementing data caps, among other measures. And by consolidating a significant amount of media power--Time Warner owns CNN, HBO, and Warner Brothers, among other properties--the merger could discriminate against competitors and harm media diversity.
"Further entrenching monopoly harms innovation and drives up prices for consumers," Common Cause special adviser Michael Copps said on Monday.
Free Press policy director Matt Wood also cautioned, "Big mergers like this inevitably mean higher prices for real people, to pay down the money borrowed to finance these deals and their golden parachutes."
Sanders' letter continued, "The diversity of programing would be further diminished by truncating the relationship of content and distribution. When one giant company owns both the content and the means of distribution, there is a clear disincentive to provide additional choices to consumers."
"The media and telecommunications landscape is changing. It is important that public policy concerns guide these changes, so that we may preserve our democratic discourse and open competitive markets for speech and commerce," he said.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Wednesday urged the U.S. Department of Justice to block the proposed AT&T-Time Warner merger, citing the widespread warnings against creating such media empires.
In a letter to the department's antitrust division, Sanders wrote, "This proposed merger is just the latest effort to shrink our media landscape, stifle competition and diversity of content, and provide consumers with less while charging them more."
"This merger represents a gross concentration of power that runs counter to the public good and should be blocked," he said.
News of the potential $85.4 billion acquisition emerged over the weekend, and media watchdogs and democracy groups like Free Press and Common Cause immediately issued warnings against it and urged federal regulators to reject it.

Opponents noted that previous mega-mergers have offset costs of the deals at their customers' expense, notably by charging more for services and implementing data caps, among other measures. And by consolidating a significant amount of media power--Time Warner owns CNN, HBO, and Warner Brothers, among other properties--the merger could discriminate against competitors and harm media diversity.
"Further entrenching monopoly harms innovation and drives up prices for consumers," Common Cause special adviser Michael Copps said on Monday.
Free Press policy director Matt Wood also cautioned, "Big mergers like this inevitably mean higher prices for real people, to pay down the money borrowed to finance these deals and their golden parachutes."
Sanders' letter continued, "The diversity of programing would be further diminished by truncating the relationship of content and distribution. When one giant company owns both the content and the means of distribution, there is a clear disincentive to provide additional choices to consumers."
"The media and telecommunications landscape is changing. It is important that public policy concerns guide these changes, so that we may preserve our democratic discourse and open competitive markets for speech and commerce," he said.