SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Senators on the U.S. Senate banking committee also suggested that Wells Fargo should be investigated for securities fraud. (Screenshot: CSPAN)
As many hoped she would, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Tuesday gave a thorough tongue-lashing to Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf for what she described as "gutless leadership" for his failure to take responsibility for the recently exposed, years-long banking fraud scandal.
"Since this massive, years-long scam came to light, you have said repeatedly, 'I am accountable.' But what have you actually done to hold yourself accountable?" the top Wall Street watchdog and Massachusetts senator asked during the U.S. Senate Banking Committee hearing on the bank's opening of millions of unauthorized accounts.
"Have you resigned as CEO or have you returned one nickle of the million of dollars that you were paid while the scam was going on?" she asked.
Stumpf responded, "the board will take care of that."
\u201cFun fact: Stumpf is CEO and chairman, so when he talks about what "the board" will do, he runs it. #WFC\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474382029
"I will take that as a 'no' then," Warren continued. "Okay, so you haven't resigned, you haven't returned a single nickel of your personal earnings, you haven't fired a single senior executive. Instead, evidently, your definition of 'accountable' is to push the blame on your low level employees that don't have a fancy PR firm to defend themselves. That's gutless leadership."
Watch the video below:
Wells Fargo has faced an onslaught of criticism since it came to light that top executives received millions in compensation despite the scandal and record $185 million fine, while over 5,000 low-level workers were fired as punishment. At one point during Tuesday's hearing, Stumpf admitted that he took home $19.3 million last year alone.
Former employees say the unethical behavior was the consequence of unrealistic sales goals--as many as 20 banking products a day in 2013--and an aggressive sales culture that came from the very top.
"This is about accountability," Warren continued. "You should resign, you should give back the money you took while this scam was going on and you should be criminally investigated by both the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission."
It is worth noting, as MSNBC does, that Warren "is one of the scant few on the Senate banking committee who has not been cut a check by Wells Fargo's political action committee."
Committee members Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) also questioned Stumpf and pointed out that, by acknowledging that he was aware of the scam, the CEO also faces allegations of securities fraud for misrepresenting "growth metrics" to investors, as reporter David Dayen pointed out in a series of tweets on the hearing.
\u201cHe's saying his sales growth metrics touted to investors were incorrect.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383336
\u201cToomey: was this fraud? Stumpf: I'm not a lawyer. Toomey: here's the definition. Stumpf: hems and haws\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383526
\u201cToomey: when did you disclose this in SEC filings? Stumpf: I can't answer that. (This is the KEY question) Toomey: haven't discovered this.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383601
\u201cStumpf would be in deep trouble if we had a Securities and Exchange Commission worth a damn. Never disclosed to investors.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383744
Dayen observes that there is "[a]bsolutely no difference between Exxon and Wells Fargo," referring to the ongoing investigation in whether the oil giant deceived investors and knowingly contributed to the climate crisis. He said both companies "lied to investors about what they knew about a material problem to the business."
"The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds," Warren concluded. "Until then it will be business as usual. And at giant banks like Wells Fargo, that seems to mean cheating as many customers, investors, and employees as they possibly can."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As many hoped she would, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Tuesday gave a thorough tongue-lashing to Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf for what she described as "gutless leadership" for his failure to take responsibility for the recently exposed, years-long banking fraud scandal.
"Since this massive, years-long scam came to light, you have said repeatedly, 'I am accountable.' But what have you actually done to hold yourself accountable?" the top Wall Street watchdog and Massachusetts senator asked during the U.S. Senate Banking Committee hearing on the bank's opening of millions of unauthorized accounts.
"Have you resigned as CEO or have you returned one nickle of the million of dollars that you were paid while the scam was going on?" she asked.
Stumpf responded, "the board will take care of that."
\u201cFun fact: Stumpf is CEO and chairman, so when he talks about what "the board" will do, he runs it. #WFC\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474382029
"I will take that as a 'no' then," Warren continued. "Okay, so you haven't resigned, you haven't returned a single nickel of your personal earnings, you haven't fired a single senior executive. Instead, evidently, your definition of 'accountable' is to push the blame on your low level employees that don't have a fancy PR firm to defend themselves. That's gutless leadership."
Watch the video below:
Wells Fargo has faced an onslaught of criticism since it came to light that top executives received millions in compensation despite the scandal and record $185 million fine, while over 5,000 low-level workers were fired as punishment. At one point during Tuesday's hearing, Stumpf admitted that he took home $19.3 million last year alone.
Former employees say the unethical behavior was the consequence of unrealistic sales goals--as many as 20 banking products a day in 2013--and an aggressive sales culture that came from the very top.
"This is about accountability," Warren continued. "You should resign, you should give back the money you took while this scam was going on and you should be criminally investigated by both the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission."
It is worth noting, as MSNBC does, that Warren "is one of the scant few on the Senate banking committee who has not been cut a check by Wells Fargo's political action committee."
Committee members Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) also questioned Stumpf and pointed out that, by acknowledging that he was aware of the scam, the CEO also faces allegations of securities fraud for misrepresenting "growth metrics" to investors, as reporter David Dayen pointed out in a series of tweets on the hearing.
\u201cHe's saying his sales growth metrics touted to investors were incorrect.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383336
\u201cToomey: was this fraud? Stumpf: I'm not a lawyer. Toomey: here's the definition. Stumpf: hems and haws\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383526
\u201cToomey: when did you disclose this in SEC filings? Stumpf: I can't answer that. (This is the KEY question) Toomey: haven't discovered this.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383601
\u201cStumpf would be in deep trouble if we had a Securities and Exchange Commission worth a damn. Never disclosed to investors.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383744
Dayen observes that there is "[a]bsolutely no difference between Exxon and Wells Fargo," referring to the ongoing investigation in whether the oil giant deceived investors and knowingly contributed to the climate crisis. He said both companies "lied to investors about what they knew about a material problem to the business."
"The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds," Warren concluded. "Until then it will be business as usual. And at giant banks like Wells Fargo, that seems to mean cheating as many customers, investors, and employees as they possibly can."
As many hoped she would, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Tuesday gave a thorough tongue-lashing to Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf for what she described as "gutless leadership" for his failure to take responsibility for the recently exposed, years-long banking fraud scandal.
"Since this massive, years-long scam came to light, you have said repeatedly, 'I am accountable.' But what have you actually done to hold yourself accountable?" the top Wall Street watchdog and Massachusetts senator asked during the U.S. Senate Banking Committee hearing on the bank's opening of millions of unauthorized accounts.
"Have you resigned as CEO or have you returned one nickle of the million of dollars that you were paid while the scam was going on?" she asked.
Stumpf responded, "the board will take care of that."
\u201cFun fact: Stumpf is CEO and chairman, so when he talks about what "the board" will do, he runs it. #WFC\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474382029
"I will take that as a 'no' then," Warren continued. "Okay, so you haven't resigned, you haven't returned a single nickel of your personal earnings, you haven't fired a single senior executive. Instead, evidently, your definition of 'accountable' is to push the blame on your low level employees that don't have a fancy PR firm to defend themselves. That's gutless leadership."
Watch the video below:
Wells Fargo has faced an onslaught of criticism since it came to light that top executives received millions in compensation despite the scandal and record $185 million fine, while over 5,000 low-level workers were fired as punishment. At one point during Tuesday's hearing, Stumpf admitted that he took home $19.3 million last year alone.
Former employees say the unethical behavior was the consequence of unrealistic sales goals--as many as 20 banking products a day in 2013--and an aggressive sales culture that came from the very top.
"This is about accountability," Warren continued. "You should resign, you should give back the money you took while this scam was going on and you should be criminally investigated by both the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission."
It is worth noting, as MSNBC does, that Warren "is one of the scant few on the Senate banking committee who has not been cut a check by Wells Fargo's political action committee."
Committee members Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Penn.) and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) also questioned Stumpf and pointed out that, by acknowledging that he was aware of the scam, the CEO also faces allegations of securities fraud for misrepresenting "growth metrics" to investors, as reporter David Dayen pointed out in a series of tweets on the hearing.
\u201cHe's saying his sales growth metrics touted to investors were incorrect.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383336
\u201cToomey: was this fraud? Stumpf: I'm not a lawyer. Toomey: here's the definition. Stumpf: hems and haws\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383526
\u201cToomey: when did you disclose this in SEC filings? Stumpf: I can't answer that. (This is the KEY question) Toomey: haven't discovered this.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383601
\u201cStumpf would be in deep trouble if we had a Securities and Exchange Commission worth a damn. Never disclosed to investors.\u201d— David Dayen (@David Dayen) 1474383744
Dayen observes that there is "[a]bsolutely no difference between Exxon and Wells Fargo," referring to the ongoing investigation in whether the oil giant deceived investors and knowingly contributed to the climate crisis. He said both companies "lied to investors about what they knew about a material problem to the business."
"The only way that Wall Street will change is if executives face jail time when they preside over massive frauds," Warren concluded. "Until then it will be business as usual. And at giant banks like Wells Fargo, that seems to mean cheating as many customers, investors, and employees as they possibly can."