

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
An official charged with investigating whistleblower cases within the U.S. intelligence community is himself blowing the whistle on alleged "public corruption," according to new reporting by McClatchy.
Journalist Marisa Taylor describes Daniel Meyer as "the Obama administration's top official overseeing how intelligence agencies handle whistleblower retaliation claims." Previously, he worked on whistleblower cases within the Pentagon--after having become a tipster himself in 1989.
She writes that according to records obtained by McClatchy, Meyer has lodged a complaint with the government's Merit Systems Protection Board accusing "his former Defense Department bosses of 'manipulation of a final report to curry favor' with then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta."
McClatchy reports:
The inspector general's report concluded that Panetta had leaked classified information to the makers of the film Zero Dark Thirty, Meyer said. That conclusion was later removed after then-acting Inspector General Lynne Halbrooks met privately with Panetta, he said. Meyer does not accuse Panetta or Halbrooks of making the change.
[...]
In April, the Office of Special Counsel, an agency that handles complaints of retaliation by whistleblowers rejected Meyer's claims, citing a lack of evidence.
In support of his retaliation claims, Meyer filed a sworn affidavit by his former boss, John Crane, a onetime assistant Defense Department inspector general. Crane was fired in 2013 and now alleges he, too, was retaliated against because of his involvement in the Zero Dark Thirty case and other controversial whistleblower claims, including one filed by former high-ranking National Security Agency official Thomas Drake.
For his involvement in this and other cases--and possibly, he says, because he is gay--Meyer told McClatchy he was "passed over for promotions and raises and his career suffered other unfair setbacks."
But as one congressional staffer, who asked to remain anonymous, told McClatchy in 2014: "Dan Meyer has been a relentless advocate for whistleblowers in making sure they don't fall through the cracks. If action is taken against him, it could have a chilling effect on whistleblowers coming forward."
As Taylor notes, "Meyer's claims add to a barrage of allegations that the federal government's handling of defense and intelligence whistleblower cases is flawed."
The news comes just ahead of National Whistleblower Appreciation Day on July 30.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An official charged with investigating whistleblower cases within the U.S. intelligence community is himself blowing the whistle on alleged "public corruption," according to new reporting by McClatchy.
Journalist Marisa Taylor describes Daniel Meyer as "the Obama administration's top official overseeing how intelligence agencies handle whistleblower retaliation claims." Previously, he worked on whistleblower cases within the Pentagon--after having become a tipster himself in 1989.
She writes that according to records obtained by McClatchy, Meyer has lodged a complaint with the government's Merit Systems Protection Board accusing "his former Defense Department bosses of 'manipulation of a final report to curry favor' with then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta."
McClatchy reports:
The inspector general's report concluded that Panetta had leaked classified information to the makers of the film Zero Dark Thirty, Meyer said. That conclusion was later removed after then-acting Inspector General Lynne Halbrooks met privately with Panetta, he said. Meyer does not accuse Panetta or Halbrooks of making the change.
[...]
In April, the Office of Special Counsel, an agency that handles complaints of retaliation by whistleblowers rejected Meyer's claims, citing a lack of evidence.
In support of his retaliation claims, Meyer filed a sworn affidavit by his former boss, John Crane, a onetime assistant Defense Department inspector general. Crane was fired in 2013 and now alleges he, too, was retaliated against because of his involvement in the Zero Dark Thirty case and other controversial whistleblower claims, including one filed by former high-ranking National Security Agency official Thomas Drake.
For his involvement in this and other cases--and possibly, he says, because he is gay--Meyer told McClatchy he was "passed over for promotions and raises and his career suffered other unfair setbacks."
But as one congressional staffer, who asked to remain anonymous, told McClatchy in 2014: "Dan Meyer has been a relentless advocate for whistleblowers in making sure they don't fall through the cracks. If action is taken against him, it could have a chilling effect on whistleblowers coming forward."
As Taylor notes, "Meyer's claims add to a barrage of allegations that the federal government's handling of defense and intelligence whistleblower cases is flawed."
The news comes just ahead of National Whistleblower Appreciation Day on July 30.
An official charged with investigating whistleblower cases within the U.S. intelligence community is himself blowing the whistle on alleged "public corruption," according to new reporting by McClatchy.
Journalist Marisa Taylor describes Daniel Meyer as "the Obama administration's top official overseeing how intelligence agencies handle whistleblower retaliation claims." Previously, he worked on whistleblower cases within the Pentagon--after having become a tipster himself in 1989.
She writes that according to records obtained by McClatchy, Meyer has lodged a complaint with the government's Merit Systems Protection Board accusing "his former Defense Department bosses of 'manipulation of a final report to curry favor' with then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta."
McClatchy reports:
The inspector general's report concluded that Panetta had leaked classified information to the makers of the film Zero Dark Thirty, Meyer said. That conclusion was later removed after then-acting Inspector General Lynne Halbrooks met privately with Panetta, he said. Meyer does not accuse Panetta or Halbrooks of making the change.
[...]
In April, the Office of Special Counsel, an agency that handles complaints of retaliation by whistleblowers rejected Meyer's claims, citing a lack of evidence.
In support of his retaliation claims, Meyer filed a sworn affidavit by his former boss, John Crane, a onetime assistant Defense Department inspector general. Crane was fired in 2013 and now alleges he, too, was retaliated against because of his involvement in the Zero Dark Thirty case and other controversial whistleblower claims, including one filed by former high-ranking National Security Agency official Thomas Drake.
For his involvement in this and other cases--and possibly, he says, because he is gay--Meyer told McClatchy he was "passed over for promotions and raises and his career suffered other unfair setbacks."
But as one congressional staffer, who asked to remain anonymous, told McClatchy in 2014: "Dan Meyer has been a relentless advocate for whistleblowers in making sure they don't fall through the cracks. If action is taken against him, it could have a chilling effect on whistleblowers coming forward."
As Taylor notes, "Meyer's claims add to a barrage of allegations that the federal government's handling of defense and intelligence whistleblower cases is flawed."
The news comes just ahead of National Whistleblower Appreciation Day on July 30.