As World Burns, Richest Nations Can't Decide When to End Fossil Fuel Handouts
Despite ambitious pledges, global energy ministers could not agree on a target date to phase out billions in subsidies to dirty energy
The world's richest nations have failed to agree on a deadline to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, a commitment energy ministers made in 2009. This has stirred new fears over the impact of the hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars that go toward keeping dirty energy afloat every year.
Energy ministers from the Group of 20 (G20) met in Beijing on Wednesday and Thursday to discuss bringing those subsidies to a close after the Group of 7 (G7), the world's seven wealthiest economies, last month committed to eliminate "inefficient" fossil fuel handouts by 2025. A report published in 2015 by the climate group Oil Change International found that the combined G20 subsidies for oil, gas, and coal production amount to roughly $444 billion a year.
But despite ambitious pledges during the COP21 summit in Paris last year and long-term campaigning from climate groups, who urged an even earlier phase-out deadline of 2020, officials could not agree on a target date.
According to the state-run Chinese news agency Xinhua, as the two-day meeting wrapped up without a firm plan in place, ministers released a communique and three other draft plans that reportedly "encouraged" G20 members to "formulate development strategies and action plans to boost renewable energy investment and consumption."
The G20 were also asked to "hold dialogues on emergencies in this field, guard against market disruptions and promote energy safety."
"G20 countries talked big in Paris about their commitment to fighting climate change, but when it comes to the basic task of stopping public support for climate-changing fossil fuels, they can't seem to take the first steps, much less walk the walk," said Stephen Kretzmann, executive director at Oil Change International.
"The world is in a deep hole with climate change, and the first thing to do in a hole is stop digging," Kretzmann said. "If world leaders want to show that they're committed to the kind of bold climate action they agreed to in Paris, the least they can do is commit to ending fossil fuel subsidies by 2020."
U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz told reporters in Beijing that a communique drafted by the ministers "repeats the importance of moving towards a subsidy reduction. But within the G-20, there are different views on how fast and aggressive one can be."
He added that in the U.S., "we'd like to see very substantial progress" by 2025 or 2030. The G7, which includes the U.S., agreed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 in May--though, as Overseas Development Institute research fellow Shelagh Whitley said at the time, "we could easily get there twice as fast."
On Thursday, a climate campaigner at Greenpeace, Li Shuo told the Washington Post, "We think that it is critical that the G-20 follows this approach, and the timeline should be even earlier."
This week's meeting led to another G20 summit in September in Hangzhou.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The world's richest nations have failed to agree on a deadline to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, a commitment energy ministers made in 2009. This has stirred new fears over the impact of the hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars that go toward keeping dirty energy afloat every year.
Energy ministers from the Group of 20 (G20) met in Beijing on Wednesday and Thursday to discuss bringing those subsidies to a close after the Group of 7 (G7), the world's seven wealthiest economies, last month committed to eliminate "inefficient" fossil fuel handouts by 2025. A report published in 2015 by the climate group Oil Change International found that the combined G20 subsidies for oil, gas, and coal production amount to roughly $444 billion a year.
But despite ambitious pledges during the COP21 summit in Paris last year and long-term campaigning from climate groups, who urged an even earlier phase-out deadline of 2020, officials could not agree on a target date.
According to the state-run Chinese news agency Xinhua, as the two-day meeting wrapped up without a firm plan in place, ministers released a communique and three other draft plans that reportedly "encouraged" G20 members to "formulate development strategies and action plans to boost renewable energy investment and consumption."
The G20 were also asked to "hold dialogues on emergencies in this field, guard against market disruptions and promote energy safety."
"G20 countries talked big in Paris about their commitment to fighting climate change, but when it comes to the basic task of stopping public support for climate-changing fossil fuels, they can't seem to take the first steps, much less walk the walk," said Stephen Kretzmann, executive director at Oil Change International.
"The world is in a deep hole with climate change, and the first thing to do in a hole is stop digging," Kretzmann said. "If world leaders want to show that they're committed to the kind of bold climate action they agreed to in Paris, the least they can do is commit to ending fossil fuel subsidies by 2020."
U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz told reporters in Beijing that a communique drafted by the ministers "repeats the importance of moving towards a subsidy reduction. But within the G-20, there are different views on how fast and aggressive one can be."
He added that in the U.S., "we'd like to see very substantial progress" by 2025 or 2030. The G7, which includes the U.S., agreed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 in May--though, as Overseas Development Institute research fellow Shelagh Whitley said at the time, "we could easily get there twice as fast."
On Thursday, a climate campaigner at Greenpeace, Li Shuo told the Washington Post, "We think that it is critical that the G-20 follows this approach, and the timeline should be even earlier."
This week's meeting led to another G20 summit in September in Hangzhou.
The world's richest nations have failed to agree on a deadline to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, a commitment energy ministers made in 2009. This has stirred new fears over the impact of the hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars that go toward keeping dirty energy afloat every year.
Energy ministers from the Group of 20 (G20) met in Beijing on Wednesday and Thursday to discuss bringing those subsidies to a close after the Group of 7 (G7), the world's seven wealthiest economies, last month committed to eliminate "inefficient" fossil fuel handouts by 2025. A report published in 2015 by the climate group Oil Change International found that the combined G20 subsidies for oil, gas, and coal production amount to roughly $444 billion a year.
But despite ambitious pledges during the COP21 summit in Paris last year and long-term campaigning from climate groups, who urged an even earlier phase-out deadline of 2020, officials could not agree on a target date.
According to the state-run Chinese news agency Xinhua, as the two-day meeting wrapped up without a firm plan in place, ministers released a communique and three other draft plans that reportedly "encouraged" G20 members to "formulate development strategies and action plans to boost renewable energy investment and consumption."
The G20 were also asked to "hold dialogues on emergencies in this field, guard against market disruptions and promote energy safety."
"G20 countries talked big in Paris about their commitment to fighting climate change, but when it comes to the basic task of stopping public support for climate-changing fossil fuels, they can't seem to take the first steps, much less walk the walk," said Stephen Kretzmann, executive director at Oil Change International.
"The world is in a deep hole with climate change, and the first thing to do in a hole is stop digging," Kretzmann said. "If world leaders want to show that they're committed to the kind of bold climate action they agreed to in Paris, the least they can do is commit to ending fossil fuel subsidies by 2020."
U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz told reporters in Beijing that a communique drafted by the ministers "repeats the importance of moving towards a subsidy reduction. But within the G-20, there are different views on how fast and aggressive one can be."
He added that in the U.S., "we'd like to see very substantial progress" by 2025 or 2030. The G7, which includes the U.S., agreed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies by 2025 in May--though, as Overseas Development Institute research fellow Shelagh Whitley said at the time, "we could easily get there twice as fast."
On Thursday, a climate campaigner at Greenpeace, Li Shuo told the Washington Post, "We think that it is critical that the G-20 follows this approach, and the timeline should be even earlier."
This week's meeting led to another G20 summit in September in Hangzhou.