New WikiLeaks Trove Further Exposes TISA's Neoliberal Agenda
Docs reveal trade deal negotiations have gone 'very far from legitimate trade concerns into the territory of a sweeping deregulatory political agenda'
WikiLeaks on Wednesday released a trove of documents detailing previously unknown pro-corporate provisions and updates to the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), exposing the extent to which the U.S.-driven deal will force signatory nations to privatize public services and deregulate corporations.
"As President Obama said of the TPP in October 2015, these agreements are about the U.S. making the rules for the global economy in the 21st century in ways that 'reflect America's values.'"
--Prof. Jane Kelsey, University of AucklandAs the 52 nations involved in TISA comprise a full two-thirds of global GDP, the deal is poised to impact billions of lives around the world. The 18th round of negotiations on TISA resumed Thursday.
Released for the very first time on Wednesday was TISA's annex on "State-Owned Enterprises" (SOEs), which mandates that public services must be treated like private businesses. The documents reveal that the annex was introduced only two days after the U.S. successfully forced through similar text in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP) in October 2015.
Trade expert Jane Kelsey, who teaches law at the University of Auckland, described how the U.S. pushed through such provisions in order to target other nations' public services--and China's in particular:
When the [TPP] negotiations began in 2010 the U.S. made it clear that it required a chapter on SOEs. The goal was always to create precedent-setting rules that could target China, although the U.S. also had other countries' SOEs in its sights--the state-managed Vietnamese economy, various countries' sovereign wealth funds, and once Japan joined, Japan Post's banking, insurance and delivery services. All the other countries were reluctant to concede the need for such a chapter and the talks went around in circles for several years. Eventually the U.S. had its way.
The leaked documents also showed new, multinational-friendly updates to sections of the deal titled "Domestic Regulation," "Transparency," and "New Provisions." The latest versions, argues WikiLeaks,
have further advanced towards the 'deregulation' objectives of big corporations entering overseas markets. Local regulations like store size restrictions or hours of operations are considered an obstacle to achieve 'operating efficiencies' of large-scale retailing, disregarding their public benefit that foster livable neighbors and reasonable hours of work for employees.
Consumer protection advocates are outraged that such radically pro-corporate deals are being hidden and negotiated away from public view.
"Consumer organizations shouldn't have to rely on leaks to find out about negotiations that will have a major impact on consumers' lives," said Amanda Long, general director of the UK-based Consumers International, on Wednesday. "Without greater transparency, the negotiations can't be exposed to the scrutiny needed to design a good agreement and build public trust, this must be a priority."
The impact of such an agreement will indeed be major: "The TISA provisions in their current form will establish a wide range of new grounds for domestic regulations to be challenged by corporations--even those without a local presence in that country," WikiLeaks concluded.
Kelsey observed, "As President Obama said of the [TPP] in October 2015, these agreements are about the U.S. making the rules for the global economy in the 21st century[...] in ways that 'reflect America's values.'"
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
WikiLeaks on Wednesday released a trove of documents detailing previously unknown pro-corporate provisions and updates to the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), exposing the extent to which the U.S.-driven deal will force signatory nations to privatize public services and deregulate corporations.
"As President Obama said of the TPP in October 2015, these agreements are about the U.S. making the rules for the global economy in the 21st century in ways that 'reflect America's values.'"
--Prof. Jane Kelsey, University of AucklandAs the 52 nations involved in TISA comprise a full two-thirds of global GDP, the deal is poised to impact billions of lives around the world. The 18th round of negotiations on TISA resumed Thursday.
Released for the very first time on Wednesday was TISA's annex on "State-Owned Enterprises" (SOEs), which mandates that public services must be treated like private businesses. The documents reveal that the annex was introduced only two days after the U.S. successfully forced through similar text in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP) in October 2015.
Trade expert Jane Kelsey, who teaches law at the University of Auckland, described how the U.S. pushed through such provisions in order to target other nations' public services--and China's in particular:
When the [TPP] negotiations began in 2010 the U.S. made it clear that it required a chapter on SOEs. The goal was always to create precedent-setting rules that could target China, although the U.S. also had other countries' SOEs in its sights--the state-managed Vietnamese economy, various countries' sovereign wealth funds, and once Japan joined, Japan Post's banking, insurance and delivery services. All the other countries were reluctant to concede the need for such a chapter and the talks went around in circles for several years. Eventually the U.S. had its way.
The leaked documents also showed new, multinational-friendly updates to sections of the deal titled "Domestic Regulation," "Transparency," and "New Provisions." The latest versions, argues WikiLeaks,
have further advanced towards the 'deregulation' objectives of big corporations entering overseas markets. Local regulations like store size restrictions or hours of operations are considered an obstacle to achieve 'operating efficiencies' of large-scale retailing, disregarding their public benefit that foster livable neighbors and reasonable hours of work for employees.
Consumer protection advocates are outraged that such radically pro-corporate deals are being hidden and negotiated away from public view.
"Consumer organizations shouldn't have to rely on leaks to find out about negotiations that will have a major impact on consumers' lives," said Amanda Long, general director of the UK-based Consumers International, on Wednesday. "Without greater transparency, the negotiations can't be exposed to the scrutiny needed to design a good agreement and build public trust, this must be a priority."
The impact of such an agreement will indeed be major: "The TISA provisions in their current form will establish a wide range of new grounds for domestic regulations to be challenged by corporations--even those without a local presence in that country," WikiLeaks concluded.
Kelsey observed, "As President Obama said of the [TPP] in October 2015, these agreements are about the U.S. making the rules for the global economy in the 21st century[...] in ways that 'reflect America's values.'"
WikiLeaks on Wednesday released a trove of documents detailing previously unknown pro-corporate provisions and updates to the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), exposing the extent to which the U.S.-driven deal will force signatory nations to privatize public services and deregulate corporations.
"As President Obama said of the TPP in October 2015, these agreements are about the U.S. making the rules for the global economy in the 21st century in ways that 'reflect America's values.'"
--Prof. Jane Kelsey, University of AucklandAs the 52 nations involved in TISA comprise a full two-thirds of global GDP, the deal is poised to impact billions of lives around the world. The 18th round of negotiations on TISA resumed Thursday.
Released for the very first time on Wednesday was TISA's annex on "State-Owned Enterprises" (SOEs), which mandates that public services must be treated like private businesses. The documents reveal that the annex was introduced only two days after the U.S. successfully forced through similar text in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TTP) in October 2015.
Trade expert Jane Kelsey, who teaches law at the University of Auckland, described how the U.S. pushed through such provisions in order to target other nations' public services--and China's in particular:
When the [TPP] negotiations began in 2010 the U.S. made it clear that it required a chapter on SOEs. The goal was always to create precedent-setting rules that could target China, although the U.S. also had other countries' SOEs in its sights--the state-managed Vietnamese economy, various countries' sovereign wealth funds, and once Japan joined, Japan Post's banking, insurance and delivery services. All the other countries were reluctant to concede the need for such a chapter and the talks went around in circles for several years. Eventually the U.S. had its way.
The leaked documents also showed new, multinational-friendly updates to sections of the deal titled "Domestic Regulation," "Transparency," and "New Provisions." The latest versions, argues WikiLeaks,
have further advanced towards the 'deregulation' objectives of big corporations entering overseas markets. Local regulations like store size restrictions or hours of operations are considered an obstacle to achieve 'operating efficiencies' of large-scale retailing, disregarding their public benefit that foster livable neighbors and reasonable hours of work for employees.
Consumer protection advocates are outraged that such radically pro-corporate deals are being hidden and negotiated away from public view.
"Consumer organizations shouldn't have to rely on leaks to find out about negotiations that will have a major impact on consumers' lives," said Amanda Long, general director of the UK-based Consumers International, on Wednesday. "Without greater transparency, the negotiations can't be exposed to the scrutiny needed to design a good agreement and build public trust, this must be a priority."
The impact of such an agreement will indeed be major: "The TISA provisions in their current form will establish a wide range of new grounds for domestic regulations to be challenged by corporations--even those without a local presence in that country," WikiLeaks concluded.
Kelsey observed, "As President Obama said of the [TPP] in October 2015, these agreements are about the U.S. making the rules for the global economy in the 21st century[...] in ways that 'reflect America's values.'"