SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senate Dems Stall SEC "Fence-Sitters" Who Won't Bare Teeth on Dark Money
The message from campaign finance reformers 'is loud and clear: the SEC must issue a rule requiring disclosure of corporate political spending.'
Apr 07, 2016
Citing their "fence-sitting" on the crucial question of whether to force corporations to reveal their political spending, top Senate Democrats on Thursday stalled a Banking Committee vote to confirm the two nominees to join the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Proponents say such a disclosure rule is necessary in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United, which unleashed unlimited spending into the U.S. political system. The SEC is in a unique position, they say, if not to get corporate money out of politics altogether, then at least to help shine a light on how corporate dollars are spent directly or indirectly to impact elections and influence policy.
According to Reuters on Thursday, "The resistance posed by Charles Schumer of New York, Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, led to procedural confusion and the Republican Committee Chairman, Richard Shelby of Alabama, decided to delay the vote."
The nominees are Democrat Lisa Fairfax and Republican Hester Peirce--both put forth by President Barack Obama--who faced sharp questioning by the same group of Democrats at a hearing in mid-March.
As the Wall Street Journal reported at the time:
Both Ms. Peirce and Ms. Fairfax, who were nominated by President Barack Obama last fall, resisted taking a clear position on the thorny issue of forcing public companies to report their political spending. Senate Democrats have pushed SEC Chairman Mary Jo White to begin drafting a rule that would require the disclosure, while Republicans say the amounts are immaterial and shouldn't have to be disclosed.
"I think there is certainly an argument to be made that it is material," Ms. Fairfax said. Ms. Peirce said she would want to read the details of any disclosure requirement before taking a position.
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) later warned the two lawyers he was "leaning against both of your nominations" because their answers weren't straightforward enough for his liking.
Added Menendez in a press release on Thursday:
Within the past month, both during and after the Committee's nomination hearing, I asked both SEC nominees for assurances that they understand the value of this important disclosure to shareholders. After hearing and reading their responses, I remain concerned that if these two nominees are confirmed, the SEC will continue to obfuscate on this critical policy matter for investors.
In a letter (pdf) to SEC chair Mary Jo White last year, 44 Democrats including Warren, Merkley, Menendez, and Schumer said that requiring public companies to disclose how they use company resources for political activities would "bring much needed accountability to shareholders and transparency to corporate political spending." Only 2.2 percent of all public companies in the U.S. do so, the letter noted, "and they do so voluntarily."
Not doing so, Warren told reporters on a call in January, is "fundamentally wrong," as "it creates an elite that can use investors' money to promote their own political preferences."
Following Thursday's development, the director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch Division said the message to the SEC nominees "is loud and clear: the SEC must issue a rule requiring disclosure of corporate political spending."
Public Citizen's Lisa Gilbert urged "the banking committee Democrats to continue to question both Peirce and Fairfax on the critical need for this rule and to make it an issue throughout the confirmation process."
More than 1.2 million people have submitted public comments to the SEC calling for a rule requiring publicly held companies to disclose details of their political spending.
For what it's worth, Fairfax's nomination was described by progressives last fall as "a victory for financial reformers who want to lessen Wall Street's influence on regulatory policy."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Citing their "fence-sitting" on the crucial question of whether to force corporations to reveal their political spending, top Senate Democrats on Thursday stalled a Banking Committee vote to confirm the two nominees to join the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Proponents say such a disclosure rule is necessary in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United, which unleashed unlimited spending into the U.S. political system. The SEC is in a unique position, they say, if not to get corporate money out of politics altogether, then at least to help shine a light on how corporate dollars are spent directly or indirectly to impact elections and influence policy.
According to Reuters on Thursday, "The resistance posed by Charles Schumer of New York, Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, led to procedural confusion and the Republican Committee Chairman, Richard Shelby of Alabama, decided to delay the vote."
The nominees are Democrat Lisa Fairfax and Republican Hester Peirce--both put forth by President Barack Obama--who faced sharp questioning by the same group of Democrats at a hearing in mid-March.
As the Wall Street Journal reported at the time:
Both Ms. Peirce and Ms. Fairfax, who were nominated by President Barack Obama last fall, resisted taking a clear position on the thorny issue of forcing public companies to report their political spending. Senate Democrats have pushed SEC Chairman Mary Jo White to begin drafting a rule that would require the disclosure, while Republicans say the amounts are immaterial and shouldn't have to be disclosed.
"I think there is certainly an argument to be made that it is material," Ms. Fairfax said. Ms. Peirce said she would want to read the details of any disclosure requirement before taking a position.
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) later warned the two lawyers he was "leaning against both of your nominations" because their answers weren't straightforward enough for his liking.
Added Menendez in a press release on Thursday:
Within the past month, both during and after the Committee's nomination hearing, I asked both SEC nominees for assurances that they understand the value of this important disclosure to shareholders. After hearing and reading their responses, I remain concerned that if these two nominees are confirmed, the SEC will continue to obfuscate on this critical policy matter for investors.
In a letter (pdf) to SEC chair Mary Jo White last year, 44 Democrats including Warren, Merkley, Menendez, and Schumer said that requiring public companies to disclose how they use company resources for political activities would "bring much needed accountability to shareholders and transparency to corporate political spending." Only 2.2 percent of all public companies in the U.S. do so, the letter noted, "and they do so voluntarily."
Not doing so, Warren told reporters on a call in January, is "fundamentally wrong," as "it creates an elite that can use investors' money to promote their own political preferences."
Following Thursday's development, the director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch Division said the message to the SEC nominees "is loud and clear: the SEC must issue a rule requiring disclosure of corporate political spending."
Public Citizen's Lisa Gilbert urged "the banking committee Democrats to continue to question both Peirce and Fairfax on the critical need for this rule and to make it an issue throughout the confirmation process."
More than 1.2 million people have submitted public comments to the SEC calling for a rule requiring publicly held companies to disclose details of their political spending.
For what it's worth, Fairfax's nomination was described by progressives last fall as "a victory for financial reformers who want to lessen Wall Street's influence on regulatory policy."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Citing their "fence-sitting" on the crucial question of whether to force corporations to reveal their political spending, top Senate Democrats on Thursday stalled a Banking Committee vote to confirm the two nominees to join the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Proponents say such a disclosure rule is necessary in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United, which unleashed unlimited spending into the U.S. political system. The SEC is in a unique position, they say, if not to get corporate money out of politics altogether, then at least to help shine a light on how corporate dollars are spent directly or indirectly to impact elections and influence policy.
According to Reuters on Thursday, "The resistance posed by Charles Schumer of New York, Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Jeff Merkley of Oregon, and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, led to procedural confusion and the Republican Committee Chairman, Richard Shelby of Alabama, decided to delay the vote."
The nominees are Democrat Lisa Fairfax and Republican Hester Peirce--both put forth by President Barack Obama--who faced sharp questioning by the same group of Democrats at a hearing in mid-March.
As the Wall Street Journal reported at the time:
Both Ms. Peirce and Ms. Fairfax, who were nominated by President Barack Obama last fall, resisted taking a clear position on the thorny issue of forcing public companies to report their political spending. Senate Democrats have pushed SEC Chairman Mary Jo White to begin drafting a rule that would require the disclosure, while Republicans say the amounts are immaterial and shouldn't have to be disclosed.
"I think there is certainly an argument to be made that it is material," Ms. Fairfax said. Ms. Peirce said she would want to read the details of any disclosure requirement before taking a position.
Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) later warned the two lawyers he was "leaning against both of your nominations" because their answers weren't straightforward enough for his liking.
Added Menendez in a press release on Thursday:
Within the past month, both during and after the Committee's nomination hearing, I asked both SEC nominees for assurances that they understand the value of this important disclosure to shareholders. After hearing and reading their responses, I remain concerned that if these two nominees are confirmed, the SEC will continue to obfuscate on this critical policy matter for investors.
In a letter (pdf) to SEC chair Mary Jo White last year, 44 Democrats including Warren, Merkley, Menendez, and Schumer said that requiring public companies to disclose how they use company resources for political activities would "bring much needed accountability to shareholders and transparency to corporate political spending." Only 2.2 percent of all public companies in the U.S. do so, the letter noted, "and they do so voluntarily."
Not doing so, Warren told reporters on a call in January, is "fundamentally wrong," as "it creates an elite that can use investors' money to promote their own political preferences."
Following Thursday's development, the director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch Division said the message to the SEC nominees "is loud and clear: the SEC must issue a rule requiring disclosure of corporate political spending."
Public Citizen's Lisa Gilbert urged "the banking committee Democrats to continue to question both Peirce and Fairfax on the critical need for this rule and to make it an issue throughout the confirmation process."
More than 1.2 million people have submitted public comments to the SEC calling for a rule requiring publicly held companies to disclose details of their political spending.
For what it's worth, Fairfax's nomination was described by progressives last fall as "a victory for financial reformers who want to lessen Wall Street's influence on regulatory policy."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.