Mar 09, 2016
In a historic ruling described as a "wake-up call" for both the nuclear industry and the Japanese government, a district court on Wednesday ordered the shutdown of Takahaka Nuclear Plant in western Japan--a decision that was welcomed by residents and local officials who said the plant posed health and safety risks.
The order, coming just days before the fifth anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, will bring the number of operating nuclear reactors in Japan down to two. According to news outlets, it is the first injunction issued in Japan to halt a nuclear plant that is currently operational.
"It's a clear message that nuclear power has no place in Japan's energy future."
--Hisayo Takada, Greenpeace Japan
The Japan Times reports:
The lawsuit that sought the injunction was filed by Shiga residents who are fearful that an accident at the Takahama plant, which lies less than 30 kilometers from the northern part of Shiga Prefecture, would impact Lake Biwa, the nation's largest freshwater body and the source of water for about 14 million people in the Kansai region, including Kyoto and Osaka.
Plaintiffs and local residents reportedly cheered and held banners after the ruling. "I'm so happy and praise the court's courage," said one person celebrating outside the courthouse.
"This is a wake-up call for nuclear industry and the government," Reutersquoted Mutsuyoshi Nishimura, a former Japanese government official and chief climate change negotiator, as saying. "They can no longer take for granted that the judiciary will follow the old ways."
And Hisayo Takada, deputy program director at Greenpeace Japan, added in a statement: "This is a landmark victory for people living in the shadow of shut-down reactors across Japan and a devastating blow against the nuclear industry and the policies of the Abe government. It's a clear message that nuclear power has no place in Japan's energy future."
The court's decision is in line with public opinion. Polls have shown that the majority of Japanese citizens want to end nuclear power in the country. Last summer, thousands protested the restart of Reactor No. 1 at the Sendai nuclear plant, about 620 miles southwest of Tokyo.
Meanwhile, a survey publicized this week found that fully two-thirds of Japan's local authorities--the heads of prefectural, city, ward, town, and village governments across the island nation--think the government should reduce, if not eliminate completely, its nuclear power capacity.
The Kyodo News survey found that nearly 45 percent of the 1,782 respondents "sought cuts in Japan's dependence on nuclear power and 21 percent requested the eventual abolishment of nuclear power generation," according to Japan Today. "Many of them cited concerns about the safety of nuclear power and the disposal of nuclear waste."
A report from Greenpeace last week warned there is "no end in sight" to the ecological fallout from the Fukushima meltdown, and that "the government's massive decontamination program will have almost no impact on reducing the ecological threat from the enormous amount of radiation" released after the disaster.
Still, authorities have started to open up areas near the damaged reactors that were previously off limits, and government housing aid is set to end next year--adding to the pressure people feel to move back.
"The government abandoned the people of Fukushima, even the children. Now the policy is to push us to go back," one nuclear refugee told the Associated Press. "It's a policy that forces radiation upon people."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In a historic ruling described as a "wake-up call" for both the nuclear industry and the Japanese government, a district court on Wednesday ordered the shutdown of Takahaka Nuclear Plant in western Japan--a decision that was welcomed by residents and local officials who said the plant posed health and safety risks.
The order, coming just days before the fifth anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, will bring the number of operating nuclear reactors in Japan down to two. According to news outlets, it is the first injunction issued in Japan to halt a nuclear plant that is currently operational.
"It's a clear message that nuclear power has no place in Japan's energy future."
--Hisayo Takada, Greenpeace Japan
The Japan Times reports:
The lawsuit that sought the injunction was filed by Shiga residents who are fearful that an accident at the Takahama plant, which lies less than 30 kilometers from the northern part of Shiga Prefecture, would impact Lake Biwa, the nation's largest freshwater body and the source of water for about 14 million people in the Kansai region, including Kyoto and Osaka.
Plaintiffs and local residents reportedly cheered and held banners after the ruling. "I'm so happy and praise the court's courage," said one person celebrating outside the courthouse.
"This is a wake-up call for nuclear industry and the government," Reutersquoted Mutsuyoshi Nishimura, a former Japanese government official and chief climate change negotiator, as saying. "They can no longer take for granted that the judiciary will follow the old ways."
And Hisayo Takada, deputy program director at Greenpeace Japan, added in a statement: "This is a landmark victory for people living in the shadow of shut-down reactors across Japan and a devastating blow against the nuclear industry and the policies of the Abe government. It's a clear message that nuclear power has no place in Japan's energy future."
The court's decision is in line with public opinion. Polls have shown that the majority of Japanese citizens want to end nuclear power in the country. Last summer, thousands protested the restart of Reactor No. 1 at the Sendai nuclear plant, about 620 miles southwest of Tokyo.
Meanwhile, a survey publicized this week found that fully two-thirds of Japan's local authorities--the heads of prefectural, city, ward, town, and village governments across the island nation--think the government should reduce, if not eliminate completely, its nuclear power capacity.
The Kyodo News survey found that nearly 45 percent of the 1,782 respondents "sought cuts in Japan's dependence on nuclear power and 21 percent requested the eventual abolishment of nuclear power generation," according to Japan Today. "Many of them cited concerns about the safety of nuclear power and the disposal of nuclear waste."
A report from Greenpeace last week warned there is "no end in sight" to the ecological fallout from the Fukushima meltdown, and that "the government's massive decontamination program will have almost no impact on reducing the ecological threat from the enormous amount of radiation" released after the disaster.
Still, authorities have started to open up areas near the damaged reactors that were previously off limits, and government housing aid is set to end next year--adding to the pressure people feel to move back.
"The government abandoned the people of Fukushima, even the children. Now the policy is to push us to go back," one nuclear refugee told the Associated Press. "It's a policy that forces radiation upon people."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In a historic ruling described as a "wake-up call" for both the nuclear industry and the Japanese government, a district court on Wednesday ordered the shutdown of Takahaka Nuclear Plant in western Japan--a decision that was welcomed by residents and local officials who said the plant posed health and safety risks.
The order, coming just days before the fifth anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, will bring the number of operating nuclear reactors in Japan down to two. According to news outlets, it is the first injunction issued in Japan to halt a nuclear plant that is currently operational.
"It's a clear message that nuclear power has no place in Japan's energy future."
--Hisayo Takada, Greenpeace Japan
The Japan Times reports:
The lawsuit that sought the injunction was filed by Shiga residents who are fearful that an accident at the Takahama plant, which lies less than 30 kilometers from the northern part of Shiga Prefecture, would impact Lake Biwa, the nation's largest freshwater body and the source of water for about 14 million people in the Kansai region, including Kyoto and Osaka.
Plaintiffs and local residents reportedly cheered and held banners after the ruling. "I'm so happy and praise the court's courage," said one person celebrating outside the courthouse.
"This is a wake-up call for nuclear industry and the government," Reutersquoted Mutsuyoshi Nishimura, a former Japanese government official and chief climate change negotiator, as saying. "They can no longer take for granted that the judiciary will follow the old ways."
And Hisayo Takada, deputy program director at Greenpeace Japan, added in a statement: "This is a landmark victory for people living in the shadow of shut-down reactors across Japan and a devastating blow against the nuclear industry and the policies of the Abe government. It's a clear message that nuclear power has no place in Japan's energy future."
The court's decision is in line with public opinion. Polls have shown that the majority of Japanese citizens want to end nuclear power in the country. Last summer, thousands protested the restart of Reactor No. 1 at the Sendai nuclear plant, about 620 miles southwest of Tokyo.
Meanwhile, a survey publicized this week found that fully two-thirds of Japan's local authorities--the heads of prefectural, city, ward, town, and village governments across the island nation--think the government should reduce, if not eliminate completely, its nuclear power capacity.
The Kyodo News survey found that nearly 45 percent of the 1,782 respondents "sought cuts in Japan's dependence on nuclear power and 21 percent requested the eventual abolishment of nuclear power generation," according to Japan Today. "Many of them cited concerns about the safety of nuclear power and the disposal of nuclear waste."
A report from Greenpeace last week warned there is "no end in sight" to the ecological fallout from the Fukushima meltdown, and that "the government's massive decontamination program will have almost no impact on reducing the ecological threat from the enormous amount of radiation" released after the disaster.
Still, authorities have started to open up areas near the damaged reactors that were previously off limits, and government housing aid is set to end next year--adding to the pressure people feel to move back.
"The government abandoned the people of Fukushima, even the children. Now the policy is to push us to go back," one nuclear refugee told the Associated Press. "It's a policy that forces radiation upon people."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.