SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Chiara D'Angelo on the anchor of the Arctic Challenger's support ship.
(Photo: Reese Semanko)
Climate Activist Who Chained Herself to Shell Vessel Argues Necessity Defense
Chiara D'Angelo, who spent three days chained to a Shell vessel last year to protest Arctic oil drilling, says her actions were necessary to prevent climate catastrophe
Mar 01, 2016
A climate activist who chained herself to a Shell vessel last year to protest oil drilling in the Arctic argued this week that she was compelled to act to prevent environmental catastrophe.
Chiara D'Angelo, 21, climbed the vessel's anchor chain with a sign that read, "Save the Arctic," and locked her harness to the side of the ship for three days and nights in May 2015 in Bellingham, Washington. She now faces a possible $20,000 fine for crossing the so-called "safety zone" around the ship.
But in a hearing with the Coast Guard on Monday, D'Angelo and her attorney invoked what's known as the "necessity defense," arguing that her actions were far less dangerous than the risks posed by allowing the ship to depart for the Arctic's Chukchi Sea, where the oil giant was poised to undertake "one of the riskiest offshore drilling operations of all time," as D'Angelo told the Bellingham Herald.
Shell had planned to explore for oil in the remote and vulnerable northern waters despite warnings from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management that the operation posed a 75 percent chance of a spill, risking the food supply for native Alaskans, who rely on fishing and marine hunting for subsistence.
D'Angelo, supported while on the chain by fellow activists who took turns keeping her company and delivering food and other supplies, told the Herald, "I acted to prevent harm."
"There was a 75 percent chance of a major oil spill in Inupiat harvesting territory," she said. "If you have this disaster there, take out their food source."
Shell's Arctic plans also catalyzed large-scale protests by land, air, and sea last year. The energy giant called off its Arctic crusade "for the foreseeable future" in September 2015, stating that there were not enough indications of oil and gas in the region to justify continued drilling.
Five climate activists charged with blocking an oil train in January used the necessity defense in a groundbreaking case. This marked the first time a U.S. judge allowed the argument in a climate trial.
The defendants were eventually found not guilty of obstruction, avoiding jail time. During the proceedings, jury members clarified that they understood that the activists were trying to raise public awareness about critical issues.
One juror reportedly told them, "Thanks for the education."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
arcticclimate activismcriminal justice systemenvironmentfossil fuelsnecessity defenseoffshore drillingoil drillingoil spilloil trainspeople powersave the arcticshellwashingtonclimate action
A climate activist who chained herself to a Shell vessel last year to protest oil drilling in the Arctic argued this week that she was compelled to act to prevent environmental catastrophe.
Chiara D'Angelo, 21, climbed the vessel's anchor chain with a sign that read, "Save the Arctic," and locked her harness to the side of the ship for three days and nights in May 2015 in Bellingham, Washington. She now faces a possible $20,000 fine for crossing the so-called "safety zone" around the ship.
But in a hearing with the Coast Guard on Monday, D'Angelo and her attorney invoked what's known as the "necessity defense," arguing that her actions were far less dangerous than the risks posed by allowing the ship to depart for the Arctic's Chukchi Sea, where the oil giant was poised to undertake "one of the riskiest offshore drilling operations of all time," as D'Angelo told the Bellingham Herald.
Shell had planned to explore for oil in the remote and vulnerable northern waters despite warnings from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management that the operation posed a 75 percent chance of a spill, risking the food supply for native Alaskans, who rely on fishing and marine hunting for subsistence.
D'Angelo, supported while on the chain by fellow activists who took turns keeping her company and delivering food and other supplies, told the Herald, "I acted to prevent harm."
"There was a 75 percent chance of a major oil spill in Inupiat harvesting territory," she said. "If you have this disaster there, take out their food source."
Shell's Arctic plans also catalyzed large-scale protests by land, air, and sea last year. The energy giant called off its Arctic crusade "for the foreseeable future" in September 2015, stating that there were not enough indications of oil and gas in the region to justify continued drilling.
Five climate activists charged with blocking an oil train in January used the necessity defense in a groundbreaking case. This marked the first time a U.S. judge allowed the argument in a climate trial.
The defendants were eventually found not guilty of obstruction, avoiding jail time. During the proceedings, jury members clarified that they understood that the activists were trying to raise public awareness about critical issues.
One juror reportedly told them, "Thanks for the education."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A climate activist who chained herself to a Shell vessel last year to protest oil drilling in the Arctic argued this week that she was compelled to act to prevent environmental catastrophe.
Chiara D'Angelo, 21, climbed the vessel's anchor chain with a sign that read, "Save the Arctic," and locked her harness to the side of the ship for three days and nights in May 2015 in Bellingham, Washington. She now faces a possible $20,000 fine for crossing the so-called "safety zone" around the ship.
But in a hearing with the Coast Guard on Monday, D'Angelo and her attorney invoked what's known as the "necessity defense," arguing that her actions were far less dangerous than the risks posed by allowing the ship to depart for the Arctic's Chukchi Sea, where the oil giant was poised to undertake "one of the riskiest offshore drilling operations of all time," as D'Angelo told the Bellingham Herald.
Shell had planned to explore for oil in the remote and vulnerable northern waters despite warnings from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management that the operation posed a 75 percent chance of a spill, risking the food supply for native Alaskans, who rely on fishing and marine hunting for subsistence.
D'Angelo, supported while on the chain by fellow activists who took turns keeping her company and delivering food and other supplies, told the Herald, "I acted to prevent harm."
"There was a 75 percent chance of a major oil spill in Inupiat harvesting territory," she said. "If you have this disaster there, take out their food source."
Shell's Arctic plans also catalyzed large-scale protests by land, air, and sea last year. The energy giant called off its Arctic crusade "for the foreseeable future" in September 2015, stating that there were not enough indications of oil and gas in the region to justify continued drilling.
Five climate activists charged with blocking an oil train in January used the necessity defense in a groundbreaking case. This marked the first time a U.S. judge allowed the argument in a climate trial.
The defendants were eventually found not guilty of obstruction, avoiding jail time. During the proceedings, jury members clarified that they understood that the activists were trying to raise public awareness about critical issues.
One juror reportedly told them, "Thanks for the education."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.