SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Protests Erupt as Trade Ministers Sign 'Toxic' TPP Agreement
'The agreement gives power to corporations and takes it away from the people,' one protester said
Feb 04, 2016
As trade ministers gathered in New Zealand on Thursday to sign the sweeping, controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), thousands of protesters gathered throughout Auckland and beyond to protest the 12-nation agreement they say "gives power to corporations and takes it away from the people."
Hundreds of protesters set up camp in front of the Sky City Convention Center in Auckland, where the signing took place, while thousands of others blockaded nearby streets and highway ramps around the area, bringing traffic to a standstill. No arrests were reported, although police violence reportedly occurred.
The deal, which was finalized in October following years of negotiations, creates a so-called "free trade" zone between 12 Pacific Rim nations, including the U.S. and Canada, which collectively account for about 40 percent of the world's economy. Opponents say the contents of the agreement, made public in November after five years of secrecy, threaten everything from human rights and public health to the environment and the very fabric of democracy.
"It's kind of a Cold War by proxy of trade and investment agreements," one protester, University of Auckland law professor Jane Kelsey, told Al Jazeera on Wednesday. "And that's a real worry because not only do the corporations who have special insights and input to this agreement get to be center stage, but also there is no balance of interests."
Rowan Brooks, one of the organizers of Thursday's action, told Al Jazeera, "Basically it eats away at New Zealand's sovereignty and the whole process was undemocratic."
"The agreement gives power to corporations and takes it away from the people," Brooks said.
Greenpeace New Zealand executive director Russel Norman said the protests in Auckland were "a direct way for people to show their feelings to the politicians and the large corporations, whose interests all too often appear to be in conflict with those of the people. And that's certainly the case with the TPP."
"Peaceful protest is the beating heart of any democracy. And that's why today's peaceful protests in Auckland are so important," Norman said.
The TPP must still be approved domestically by individual partnership countries. Among Thursday's protesters was MP Hone Harawira, of the Mana Party, one of New Zealand's leading voices against the TPP. Harawira told the crowd they had no choice but to keep up large-scale actions to convince the government not to approve the agreement.
"We can't afford not to send a signal on this day, the day of the signing, and keep sending it day in and day out," he said.
In the U.S., approval would mean ratification by Congress. It is unlikely that lawmakers will take up the issue until after the 2016 presidential election in November, which gives opponents time to strengthen the movement against it.
As Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune said Wednesday, "Thankfully, it's not too late to stop this toxic deal. Congress holds the trump card on the widely unpopular TPP, so now is the time to urge our representatives to reject the toxic trade deal and build a new model of trade that puts the health and safety of people before the profits of big corporations that are already polluting our air and water."
One trade minister who supports the deal said getting the U.S. on board was key. "To achieve anything that's a wide-ranging, international agreement on trade, especially in agriculture, you must have the United States involved," Sir Graeme Harrison, the founder and chairman of meat processor ANZCO Foods, told Radio New Zealand. "And if I look at the protests against TPP, I'd say, in a nutshell, they're anti-American."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
As trade ministers gathered in New Zealand on Thursday to sign the sweeping, controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), thousands of protesters gathered throughout Auckland and beyond to protest the 12-nation agreement they say "gives power to corporations and takes it away from the people."
Hundreds of protesters set up camp in front of the Sky City Convention Center in Auckland, where the signing took place, while thousands of others blockaded nearby streets and highway ramps around the area, bringing traffic to a standstill. No arrests were reported, although police violence reportedly occurred.
The deal, which was finalized in October following years of negotiations, creates a so-called "free trade" zone between 12 Pacific Rim nations, including the U.S. and Canada, which collectively account for about 40 percent of the world's economy. Opponents say the contents of the agreement, made public in November after five years of secrecy, threaten everything from human rights and public health to the environment and the very fabric of democracy.
"It's kind of a Cold War by proxy of trade and investment agreements," one protester, University of Auckland law professor Jane Kelsey, told Al Jazeera on Wednesday. "And that's a real worry because not only do the corporations who have special insights and input to this agreement get to be center stage, but also there is no balance of interests."
Rowan Brooks, one of the organizers of Thursday's action, told Al Jazeera, "Basically it eats away at New Zealand's sovereignty and the whole process was undemocratic."
"The agreement gives power to corporations and takes it away from the people," Brooks said.
Greenpeace New Zealand executive director Russel Norman said the protests in Auckland were "a direct way for people to show their feelings to the politicians and the large corporations, whose interests all too often appear to be in conflict with those of the people. And that's certainly the case with the TPP."
"Peaceful protest is the beating heart of any democracy. And that's why today's peaceful protests in Auckland are so important," Norman said.
The TPP must still be approved domestically by individual partnership countries. Among Thursday's protesters was MP Hone Harawira, of the Mana Party, one of New Zealand's leading voices against the TPP. Harawira told the crowd they had no choice but to keep up large-scale actions to convince the government not to approve the agreement.
"We can't afford not to send a signal on this day, the day of the signing, and keep sending it day in and day out," he said.
In the U.S., approval would mean ratification by Congress. It is unlikely that lawmakers will take up the issue until after the 2016 presidential election in November, which gives opponents time to strengthen the movement against it.
As Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune said Wednesday, "Thankfully, it's not too late to stop this toxic deal. Congress holds the trump card on the widely unpopular TPP, so now is the time to urge our representatives to reject the toxic trade deal and build a new model of trade that puts the health and safety of people before the profits of big corporations that are already polluting our air and water."
One trade minister who supports the deal said getting the U.S. on board was key. "To achieve anything that's a wide-ranging, international agreement on trade, especially in agriculture, you must have the United States involved," Sir Graeme Harrison, the founder and chairman of meat processor ANZCO Foods, told Radio New Zealand. "And if I look at the protests against TPP, I'd say, in a nutshell, they're anti-American."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
As trade ministers gathered in New Zealand on Thursday to sign the sweeping, controversial Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), thousands of protesters gathered throughout Auckland and beyond to protest the 12-nation agreement they say "gives power to corporations and takes it away from the people."
Hundreds of protesters set up camp in front of the Sky City Convention Center in Auckland, where the signing took place, while thousands of others blockaded nearby streets and highway ramps around the area, bringing traffic to a standstill. No arrests were reported, although police violence reportedly occurred.
The deal, which was finalized in October following years of negotiations, creates a so-called "free trade" zone between 12 Pacific Rim nations, including the U.S. and Canada, which collectively account for about 40 percent of the world's economy. Opponents say the contents of the agreement, made public in November after five years of secrecy, threaten everything from human rights and public health to the environment and the very fabric of democracy.
"It's kind of a Cold War by proxy of trade and investment agreements," one protester, University of Auckland law professor Jane Kelsey, told Al Jazeera on Wednesday. "And that's a real worry because not only do the corporations who have special insights and input to this agreement get to be center stage, but also there is no balance of interests."
Rowan Brooks, one of the organizers of Thursday's action, told Al Jazeera, "Basically it eats away at New Zealand's sovereignty and the whole process was undemocratic."
"The agreement gives power to corporations and takes it away from the people," Brooks said.
Greenpeace New Zealand executive director Russel Norman said the protests in Auckland were "a direct way for people to show their feelings to the politicians and the large corporations, whose interests all too often appear to be in conflict with those of the people. And that's certainly the case with the TPP."
"Peaceful protest is the beating heart of any democracy. And that's why today's peaceful protests in Auckland are so important," Norman said.
The TPP must still be approved domestically by individual partnership countries. Among Thursday's protesters was MP Hone Harawira, of the Mana Party, one of New Zealand's leading voices against the TPP. Harawira told the crowd they had no choice but to keep up large-scale actions to convince the government not to approve the agreement.
"We can't afford not to send a signal on this day, the day of the signing, and keep sending it day in and day out," he said.
In the U.S., approval would mean ratification by Congress. It is unlikely that lawmakers will take up the issue until after the 2016 presidential election in November, which gives opponents time to strengthen the movement against it.
As Sierra Club executive director Michael Brune said Wednesday, "Thankfully, it's not too late to stop this toxic deal. Congress holds the trump card on the widely unpopular TPP, so now is the time to urge our representatives to reject the toxic trade deal and build a new model of trade that puts the health and safety of people before the profits of big corporations that are already polluting our air and water."
One trade minister who supports the deal said getting the U.S. on board was key. "To achieve anything that's a wide-ranging, international agreement on trade, especially in agriculture, you must have the United States involved," Sir Graeme Harrison, the founder and chairman of meat processor ANZCO Foods, told Radio New Zealand. "And if I look at the protests against TPP, I'd say, in a nutshell, they're anti-American."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.