Reprieve for Amazon as Controversial Dam Gets Setback
Operating suspension issued for Belo Monte Dam in Brazil
In a case described as precedent-setting, a Brazilian court has suspended the operating license for one of the world's biggest--and most controversial--dams.
The long-contested Belo Monte Dam, would be the world's third-largest such hydroelectric project, International Rivers explains, and would "divert the flow of the Xingu, devastate an extensive area of the Brazilian rainforest, displace over 20,000 people, and threaten the survival of indigenous tribes that depend on the river."
The court Federal Court in Altamira, Para, EFE reports, issued the suspension last Thursday because the company and government had failed for the past year to present a plan of how they would set up a regional office of the national Indian protection agency to help mitigate consequences the project would unleash.
The court also issued a fine to the company and government of $225,000 for the failure.
Writing in 2012, human rights advocate Bianca Jagger said the dam would "change the face of the Amazon basin forever," and, as it would necessitate creation of even more dams, she added, "The destruction will not stop at Belo Monte. Belo Monte is only the beginning of this human rights and environmental catastrophe."
Reuters reports that electricity generation from the dam was just weeks away.
Christian Poirier of Amazon Watch told the Guardian that though the decision would not stop Belo Monte, "This case sets an important precedent for the defence of indigenous rights in the Amazon at a time when the government is set to repeat the Belo Monte disaster by building dozens of dams on the Tapajos River."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a case described as precedent-setting, a Brazilian court has suspended the operating license for one of the world's biggest--and most controversial--dams.
The long-contested Belo Monte Dam, would be the world's third-largest such hydroelectric project, International Rivers explains, and would "divert the flow of the Xingu, devastate an extensive area of the Brazilian rainforest, displace over 20,000 people, and threaten the survival of indigenous tribes that depend on the river."
The court Federal Court in Altamira, Para, EFE reports, issued the suspension last Thursday because the company and government had failed for the past year to present a plan of how they would set up a regional office of the national Indian protection agency to help mitigate consequences the project would unleash.
The court also issued a fine to the company and government of $225,000 for the failure.
Writing in 2012, human rights advocate Bianca Jagger said the dam would "change the face of the Amazon basin forever," and, as it would necessitate creation of even more dams, she added, "The destruction will not stop at Belo Monte. Belo Monte is only the beginning of this human rights and environmental catastrophe."
Reuters reports that electricity generation from the dam was just weeks away.
Christian Poirier of Amazon Watch told the Guardian that though the decision would not stop Belo Monte, "This case sets an important precedent for the defence of indigenous rights in the Amazon at a time when the government is set to repeat the Belo Monte disaster by building dozens of dams on the Tapajos River."
In a case described as precedent-setting, a Brazilian court has suspended the operating license for one of the world's biggest--and most controversial--dams.
The long-contested Belo Monte Dam, would be the world's third-largest such hydroelectric project, International Rivers explains, and would "divert the flow of the Xingu, devastate an extensive area of the Brazilian rainforest, displace over 20,000 people, and threaten the survival of indigenous tribes that depend on the river."
The court Federal Court in Altamira, Para, EFE reports, issued the suspension last Thursday because the company and government had failed for the past year to present a plan of how they would set up a regional office of the national Indian protection agency to help mitigate consequences the project would unleash.
The court also issued a fine to the company and government of $225,000 for the failure.
Writing in 2012, human rights advocate Bianca Jagger said the dam would "change the face of the Amazon basin forever," and, as it would necessitate creation of even more dams, she added, "The destruction will not stop at Belo Monte. Belo Monte is only the beginning of this human rights and environmental catastrophe."
Reuters reports that electricity generation from the dam was just weeks away.
Christian Poirier of Amazon Watch told the Guardian that though the decision would not stop Belo Monte, "This case sets an important precedent for the defence of indigenous rights in the Amazon at a time when the government is set to repeat the Belo Monte disaster by building dozens of dams on the Tapajos River."