

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
After a record amount of support on the final day, the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign announced it raised $26 million in the third quarter, closing the funding lead held by rival Hillary Clinton substantially and proving that his small-donor strategy has the power to compete with the big-money operation maintained by the Democratic frontrunner.
"I don't go around asking millionaires and billionaires asking for money. This movement is powered by working Americans who have had enough of our government working exclusively for a handful of wealthy individuals. I am very proud of that fact."-- Bernie Sanders
As of midnight Wednesday, the Sanders campaign told various media outlets it raised more than $2 million online Wednesday, bringing its total for the quarter to $26 million. Citing contributions that average around $25, the campaign says it has now received contributions from more than 650,000 different donors. The $26 million total over the last three months--during which Sanders' poll numbers have surged in key states and nationwide--is drastically larger than the $15 million he raised in the second quarter.
Meanwhile, the Clinton camp reports she was able to raise $28 million in the third quarter, down significantly from the $45 million that poured in during the previous three-month stretch.
As many observes note, however, the biggest--and more significant--difference is the way in which Clinton and Sanders are raising their money. As CNN reports:
A bulk of Clinton's haul came from events she personally headlined across the country, a labor intensive process for the candidate that has required her to spend considerable amounts of time on the fundraising trail.
Clinton personally headlined 58 fundraisers from July 1 to September 30, a pace identical to the 58 fundraisers she headlined in the second quarter. In the last week she has personally headlined over dozen events.
And based on CNN's analysis of figures provided by the Clinton campaign, the 2016 candidate likely raised well above $22 million at the events she personally headlined.
Sanders, on the other hand, rarely personally headlines fundraisers. At an event earlier this summer in Seattle, the candidate joked that he was a little uncomfortable speaking at a packed bar where people paid to see him.
Almost all of Sanders' haul came from the campaign's sizable online fundraising operation. Briggs said the campaign has received 1.3 million donations from 650,000 donors since launching earlier this year.
The third-quarter figures, explained Sanders campaign adviser Ted Devine to Time magazine, are "an objective measure of how far the campaign has come in a very short time. If we continue to build on this we will not only have resources for the front end of the campaign, we will have built an infrastructure ... when we move into the national campaign on Super Tuesday."
One of the key advantages that comes with Sanders' small-donor strategy, notes MSNBC, "is that Sanders can return to his donors many times to ask for more money, while many of Clinton's donors will have already given as much as they can for the primary campaign under federal law."
But perhaps just as important to the Sanders campaign is how its fundraising efforts conform to the message that is driving his popularity. "I don't go around asking millionaires and billionaires asking for money," Sanders said in a fundraising letter to the campaign's email list on Wednesday. "This movement is powered by working Americans who have had enough of our government working exclusively for a handful of wealthy individuals. I am very proud of that fact."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After a record amount of support on the final day, the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign announced it raised $26 million in the third quarter, closing the funding lead held by rival Hillary Clinton substantially and proving that his small-donor strategy has the power to compete with the big-money operation maintained by the Democratic frontrunner.
"I don't go around asking millionaires and billionaires asking for money. This movement is powered by working Americans who have had enough of our government working exclusively for a handful of wealthy individuals. I am very proud of that fact."-- Bernie Sanders
As of midnight Wednesday, the Sanders campaign told various media outlets it raised more than $2 million online Wednesday, bringing its total for the quarter to $26 million. Citing contributions that average around $25, the campaign says it has now received contributions from more than 650,000 different donors. The $26 million total over the last three months--during which Sanders' poll numbers have surged in key states and nationwide--is drastically larger than the $15 million he raised in the second quarter.
Meanwhile, the Clinton camp reports she was able to raise $28 million in the third quarter, down significantly from the $45 million that poured in during the previous three-month stretch.
As many observes note, however, the biggest--and more significant--difference is the way in which Clinton and Sanders are raising their money. As CNN reports:
A bulk of Clinton's haul came from events she personally headlined across the country, a labor intensive process for the candidate that has required her to spend considerable amounts of time on the fundraising trail.
Clinton personally headlined 58 fundraisers from July 1 to September 30, a pace identical to the 58 fundraisers she headlined in the second quarter. In the last week she has personally headlined over dozen events.
And based on CNN's analysis of figures provided by the Clinton campaign, the 2016 candidate likely raised well above $22 million at the events she personally headlined.
Sanders, on the other hand, rarely personally headlines fundraisers. At an event earlier this summer in Seattle, the candidate joked that he was a little uncomfortable speaking at a packed bar where people paid to see him.
Almost all of Sanders' haul came from the campaign's sizable online fundraising operation. Briggs said the campaign has received 1.3 million donations from 650,000 donors since launching earlier this year.
The third-quarter figures, explained Sanders campaign adviser Ted Devine to Time magazine, are "an objective measure of how far the campaign has come in a very short time. If we continue to build on this we will not only have resources for the front end of the campaign, we will have built an infrastructure ... when we move into the national campaign on Super Tuesday."
One of the key advantages that comes with Sanders' small-donor strategy, notes MSNBC, "is that Sanders can return to his donors many times to ask for more money, while many of Clinton's donors will have already given as much as they can for the primary campaign under federal law."
But perhaps just as important to the Sanders campaign is how its fundraising efforts conform to the message that is driving his popularity. "I don't go around asking millionaires and billionaires asking for money," Sanders said in a fundraising letter to the campaign's email list on Wednesday. "This movement is powered by working Americans who have had enough of our government working exclusively for a handful of wealthy individuals. I am very proud of that fact."
After a record amount of support on the final day, the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign announced it raised $26 million in the third quarter, closing the funding lead held by rival Hillary Clinton substantially and proving that his small-donor strategy has the power to compete with the big-money operation maintained by the Democratic frontrunner.
"I don't go around asking millionaires and billionaires asking for money. This movement is powered by working Americans who have had enough of our government working exclusively for a handful of wealthy individuals. I am very proud of that fact."-- Bernie Sanders
As of midnight Wednesday, the Sanders campaign told various media outlets it raised more than $2 million online Wednesday, bringing its total for the quarter to $26 million. Citing contributions that average around $25, the campaign says it has now received contributions from more than 650,000 different donors. The $26 million total over the last three months--during which Sanders' poll numbers have surged in key states and nationwide--is drastically larger than the $15 million he raised in the second quarter.
Meanwhile, the Clinton camp reports she was able to raise $28 million in the third quarter, down significantly from the $45 million that poured in during the previous three-month stretch.
As many observes note, however, the biggest--and more significant--difference is the way in which Clinton and Sanders are raising their money. As CNN reports:
A bulk of Clinton's haul came from events she personally headlined across the country, a labor intensive process for the candidate that has required her to spend considerable amounts of time on the fundraising trail.
Clinton personally headlined 58 fundraisers from July 1 to September 30, a pace identical to the 58 fundraisers she headlined in the second quarter. In the last week she has personally headlined over dozen events.
And based on CNN's analysis of figures provided by the Clinton campaign, the 2016 candidate likely raised well above $22 million at the events she personally headlined.
Sanders, on the other hand, rarely personally headlines fundraisers. At an event earlier this summer in Seattle, the candidate joked that he was a little uncomfortable speaking at a packed bar where people paid to see him.
Almost all of Sanders' haul came from the campaign's sizable online fundraising operation. Briggs said the campaign has received 1.3 million donations from 650,000 donors since launching earlier this year.
The third-quarter figures, explained Sanders campaign adviser Ted Devine to Time magazine, are "an objective measure of how far the campaign has come in a very short time. If we continue to build on this we will not only have resources for the front end of the campaign, we will have built an infrastructure ... when we move into the national campaign on Super Tuesday."
One of the key advantages that comes with Sanders' small-donor strategy, notes MSNBC, "is that Sanders can return to his donors many times to ask for more money, while many of Clinton's donors will have already given as much as they can for the primary campaign under federal law."
But perhaps just as important to the Sanders campaign is how its fundraising efforts conform to the message that is driving his popularity. "I don't go around asking millionaires and billionaires asking for money," Sanders said in a fundraising letter to the campaign's email list on Wednesday. "This movement is powered by working Americans who have had enough of our government working exclusively for a handful of wealthy individuals. I am very proud of that fact."