U.S. Central Command Commander Gen. Lloyd Austin III admitted last week that, despite a $500 million train and arm program, the U.S. had no more than five Syrian combatants remaining active in the country (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
Sep 26, 2015
The U.S.-trained and armed rebels at the center of President Barack Obama's Syria policy have turned over at least a quarter of their American-issued equipment to the the al Nusra Front, which is linked with al Qaeda, Central Command admitted late Friday.
"Today the [New Syrian Forces] unit contacted Coalition representatives and informed us that on Sept. 21-22 they gave six pick-up trucks and a portion of their ammunition to a suspected al Nusra Front intermediary, which equates to roughly 25 percent of their issued equipment," said Col. Patrick Ryder, Central Command spokesperson, in a press statement.
The equipment was surrendered "in exchange for safe passage within their operating area," according to Central Command.
The revelation contradicts U.S. military officials' claims earlier this week that the U.S.-backed forces had not, in fact, given their equipment and arms to al-Nusra. Ryder said Central Command had received "new information," emphasizing that "the report of NSF members providing equipment to Al Nusra Front is very concerning and a violation of Syria train and equip program guidelines."
Friday's announcement follows last week's admission by Central Command Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III that, despite a $500 million train and arm program, the U.S. had no more than five Syrian combatants remaining active in the country. Despite this failure, Central Command announced earlier this week it had sent an additional 70 graduates of a U.S. anti-ISIS training program, and those forces have "successfully re-entered Syria complete with their weapons and equipment and are currently operating as New Syrian Forces."
Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command has been scandalized by a series of reports alleging it has deceived the public by falsely claiming that U.S. air strikes against ISIS are more effective than they actually are. In response, the Pentagon launched an investigation last month.
Critics charge that Friday's revelations underscore that the Obama administration's policies of regime change and armed intervention in Syria have failed, and there is no U.S. military solution to the conflict. Yet hawkish voices in the U.S.--from retired general David Petraeus to Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.)--continue to call for even more aggressive bombing and military action.
"Critics of the administration are saying that the U.S. program to arm and train these people is a failure and obviously they are right," Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, told Common Dreams. "But that doesn't mean the answer is military escalation. The answer is that the whole project is flawed from the start."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
The U.S.-trained and armed rebels at the center of President Barack Obama's Syria policy have turned over at least a quarter of their American-issued equipment to the the al Nusra Front, which is linked with al Qaeda, Central Command admitted late Friday.
"Today the [New Syrian Forces] unit contacted Coalition representatives and informed us that on Sept. 21-22 they gave six pick-up trucks and a portion of their ammunition to a suspected al Nusra Front intermediary, which equates to roughly 25 percent of their issued equipment," said Col. Patrick Ryder, Central Command spokesperson, in a press statement.
The equipment was surrendered "in exchange for safe passage within their operating area," according to Central Command.
The revelation contradicts U.S. military officials' claims earlier this week that the U.S.-backed forces had not, in fact, given their equipment and arms to al-Nusra. Ryder said Central Command had received "new information," emphasizing that "the report of NSF members providing equipment to Al Nusra Front is very concerning and a violation of Syria train and equip program guidelines."
Friday's announcement follows last week's admission by Central Command Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III that, despite a $500 million train and arm program, the U.S. had no more than five Syrian combatants remaining active in the country. Despite this failure, Central Command announced earlier this week it had sent an additional 70 graduates of a U.S. anti-ISIS training program, and those forces have "successfully re-entered Syria complete with their weapons and equipment and are currently operating as New Syrian Forces."
Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command has been scandalized by a series of reports alleging it has deceived the public by falsely claiming that U.S. air strikes against ISIS are more effective than they actually are. In response, the Pentagon launched an investigation last month.
Critics charge that Friday's revelations underscore that the Obama administration's policies of regime change and armed intervention in Syria have failed, and there is no U.S. military solution to the conflict. Yet hawkish voices in the U.S.--from retired general David Petraeus to Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.)--continue to call for even more aggressive bombing and military action.
"Critics of the administration are saying that the U.S. program to arm and train these people is a failure and obviously they are right," Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, told Common Dreams. "But that doesn't mean the answer is military escalation. The answer is that the whole project is flawed from the start."
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
The U.S.-trained and armed rebels at the center of President Barack Obama's Syria policy have turned over at least a quarter of their American-issued equipment to the the al Nusra Front, which is linked with al Qaeda, Central Command admitted late Friday.
"Today the [New Syrian Forces] unit contacted Coalition representatives and informed us that on Sept. 21-22 they gave six pick-up trucks and a portion of their ammunition to a suspected al Nusra Front intermediary, which equates to roughly 25 percent of their issued equipment," said Col. Patrick Ryder, Central Command spokesperson, in a press statement.
The equipment was surrendered "in exchange for safe passage within their operating area," according to Central Command.
The revelation contradicts U.S. military officials' claims earlier this week that the U.S.-backed forces had not, in fact, given their equipment and arms to al-Nusra. Ryder said Central Command had received "new information," emphasizing that "the report of NSF members providing equipment to Al Nusra Front is very concerning and a violation of Syria train and equip program guidelines."
Friday's announcement follows last week's admission by Central Command Commander Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III that, despite a $500 million train and arm program, the U.S. had no more than five Syrian combatants remaining active in the country. Despite this failure, Central Command announced earlier this week it had sent an additional 70 graduates of a U.S. anti-ISIS training program, and those forces have "successfully re-entered Syria complete with their weapons and equipment and are currently operating as New Syrian Forces."
Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command has been scandalized by a series of reports alleging it has deceived the public by falsely claiming that U.S. air strikes against ISIS are more effective than they actually are. In response, the Pentagon launched an investigation last month.
Critics charge that Friday's revelations underscore that the Obama administration's policies of regime change and armed intervention in Syria have failed, and there is no U.S. military solution to the conflict. Yet hawkish voices in the U.S.--from retired general David Petraeus to Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.)--continue to call for even more aggressive bombing and military action.
"Critics of the administration are saying that the U.S. program to arm and train these people is a failure and obviously they are right," Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, told Common Dreams. "But that doesn't mean the answer is military escalation. The answer is that the whole project is flawed from the start."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.