Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

No state in the U.S. has measured up to global standards for the use of deadly force by police. (Photo: JPL Designs / Shutterstock)

Failing to Meet Global Police Standards, US Forsakes 'the Right to Life'

'The fact that absolutely no state laws conform to this standard is deeply disturbing and raises serious human rights concerns.'

Nadia Prupis

Each of the 50 United States has failed to comply with international standards on police use of lethal force, a reality that threatens lives, poses grave human rights concerns, perpetuates institutional racism, and requires immediate reform, a new report by Amnesty International published Thursday has found.

Moreover, the limited available statistics on police killings of civilians, as well as recent high-profile shootings of unarmed black men and women around the country, exposes "a widespread pattern of racially discriminatory treatment by law enforcement officers and an alarming use of lethal force nationwide."

"Police have a fundamental obligation to protect human life. Deadly force must be reserved as a method of absolute last resort," said Steven W. Hawkins, executive director of Amnesty International USA. "The fact that absolutely no state laws conform to this standard is deeply disturbing and raises serious human rights concerns."

In Deadly Force: Police Use of Lethal Force in the United States (pdf), researchers reviewed U.S. Supreme Court decisions, guidelines on deadly force as issued by the U.S. Justice Department, and available statistical data on fatal encounters, which led to one stark conclusion:

The United States has failed to respect and protect the right to life by failing to ensure that domestic legislation meets international human rights law and standards on the use of lethal force by law enforcement officers.


We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message!

Common Dreams is a not-for-profit news service. All of our content is free to you - no subscriptions; no ads. We are funded by donations from our readers.

Our critical Mid-Year fundraiser is going very slowly - only 733 readers have contributed so far. We must meet our goal before we can end this fundraising campaign and get back to focusing on what we do best.
If you support Common Dreams and you want us to survive, we need you now.
Please make a tax-deductible gift to our Mid-Year Fundraiser now!

What is needed now, according to Amnesty, is an immediate overhaul of policing practices and standards at both the state and federal levels to ensure that use of lethal force is restricted in compliance with international law. In addition, the organization recommends that statistics on police shootings be collected and published by the Justice Department; that accountability and oversight for the use of lethal force be enforced; and that the Police Reporting Information, Data, and Evidence (PRIDE) Act and the End Racial Profiling Act be passed into law.

Basic principles on the use of force and firearms by law enforcement, as dictated by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ratified by the U.S. in 1992, state that "lethal use of firearms may only be made when strictly unavoidable in order to protect life," the report notes.

"Reform is needed and it is needed and it is needed immediately. Lives are at stake."
Stephen W. Hawkins, Amnesty International USA

Every U.S. state, as well as Washington, D.C., fail in this regard, Amnesty found. Thirteen states do not even comply with "the lower standards set by U.S. constitutional law" on the use of police deadly force, while nine states and Washington, D.C. currently have zero laws on the issue.

Those states include Maryland, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Michigan, Ohio, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

But enforcing guidelines on use of deadly force should not simply allow law enforcement to fall back on methods considered "less lethal" than firearms, such as Tasers or physical force, Amnesty states: "International standards also emphasize the need for law enforcement to use other means before resorting to the use of force, and to be trained in alternatives to the use of force, including the peaceful settlement of conflicts, understanding of crowd behavior, and skills of persuasion, negotiation and mediation."

Domestic laws worldwide must comply with international standards, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions Christof Heyns said in a 2014 report, cited by Amnesty. "It is too late to attend to this when tensions rise."

Thursday's report comes just weeks after President Barack Obama's Task Force on 21st Century Policing released its findings on law enforcement in the U.S. and recommendations on reforming it.

That task force concluded:

Paramount among the policies of law enforcement organizations are those controlling use of force. Not only should there be policies for deadly and nondeadly uses of force but a clearly stated 'sanctity of life' philosophy must also be in the forefront of every officer's mind. This way of thinking should be accompanied by rigorous practical ongoing training in an atmosphere of non-judgmental and safe sharing of views with fellow officers about how they behaved in use of force situations.

Amnesty's report also lists a number of recent high-profile cases to illustrate how police killings span age, gender, and method—but disproportionately target black and brown communities.

There was Michael Brown, 18, of Ferguson, Missouri. There was Kajieme Powell, 25, of St. Louis, Missouri—just 10 days later. There was Rekia Boyd, 22, of Chicago, Illinois. Eric Garner, 43, of Long Island, New York. Ezell Ford, 25, of Los Angeles, California. Tamir Rice, 12, of Cleveland, Ohio. Walter Scott, 50, of North Charleston, South Carolina. And Freddie Gray, 25, of Baltimore, Maryland.

"These are all cases that have received national media attention; however, there are many more including Hispanic and Indigenous individuals from communities across the country who have died at the hands of the police," the report states.

"Reform is needed and it is needed immediately," Hawkins added. "Lives are at stake."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.


80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·

In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·

Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Patients in Trigger-Ban States Immediately Denied Abortion Care in Post-Roe US

Some people scheduled to receive abortions were turned away within minutes of the right-wing Supreme Court's decision to strike down Roe v. Wade.

Kenny Stancil ·

Common Dreams Logo