'Here We Go Again': Cable Mega-Merger Redux as Charter Bids for Time Warner Cable
If approved, the mega-merger would make Charter second in size only to Comcast, which itself recently abandoned an attempt to acquire TWC after a groundswell of public opposition
Charter Communications, currently the fourth-largest cable television company in the United States, has confirmed a deal that would see it purchase Time Warner Cable, the nation's second-largest cable and internet company, for approximately $55 billion in cash and stock.
As Bloomberg notes, if the deal is ultimately allowed to go through, it would allow "Charter, whose largest shareholder is billionaire John Malone, to almost quadruple its number of cable subscribers, gaining 12 million customers in cities including New York, Los Angeles and Dallas." Charter also confirmed that as part of its acquisition place it plans to buy a smaller cable company, Bright House Networks, for $10.4 billion.
If approved, the mega-merger would make Charter second in size only to Comcast, which itself recently abandoned an attempt to acquire TWC after a groundswell of public opposition and strong signals from federal anti-trust officials and the Federal Communications Commission that such a large company would present monopoly concerns and violate the public interest.
Responding to the news, the media watchdog group Free Press on Tuesday said there is little difference between Charter's bid and that consumers will see no benefit at all from its purchase of TWC.
"Ultimately, this merger is yet another example of the poor incentives Wall Street's quarterly-result mentality creates," said S. Derek Turner, the group's research director. "Charter would rather take on an enormous amount of debt to pay a premium for Time Warner Cable than build fiber infrastructure, improve service for its existing customers or bring competition into new communities."
According to the Washington Post:
Regulators had moved to block Comcast's merger with Time Warner Cable because of concern over the market for broadband Internet service. Together, Comcast and Time Warner Cable would have controlled more than 50 percent of all broadband connections in the United States, with more than 34 million subscribers. Charter's purchase of Time Warner Cable would create a bigger cable firm, and a stronger rival to Comcast and a combined AT&T and DirecTV.
Comcast's ownership of vast media properties through NBC Universal also posed problems for regulators. Critics were also concerned about Comcast's bid for Time Warner Cable because of the company's potential ability to use its powerful hold on so many home subscribers to create a disadvantage for online video rivals such as Netflix and YouTube that compete with its cable TV and media properties.
"It appears much less of an antitrust concern than the Comcast deal," said Gene Kimmelman, a former senior antitrust official for the Justice Department and current president of Public Knowledge, a nonprofit group. "It is more likely to face [Federal Communications Commission] scrutiny for how it actually promotes the public interest."
In an initial tweet expressing exasperation with the such mega-mergers, Free Press said on Monday:
Though public outrage, led by groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge, played a key role in blocking the Comcast/TWC deal, there's no guarantee that this latest attempt to create a new cable giant will ultimately be frowned upon by government regulators. As the Wall Street Journal reports:
The backlash to Comcast's bid for Time Warner Cable at the Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department left many cable executives and investors wondering whether any transformational cable-industry deal could withstand regulatory review.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler called cable executives including Time Warner Cable's Mr. Marcus and Charter CEO Tom Rutledge in recent days to convey that they shouldn't assume the agency is against any and all future deals just because of what happened with Comcast, according to a person familiar with the matter.
However, Free Press' Turner said that his group will oppose the deal with the same gusto as it did Comcast's.
"Charter will have a tough time making a credible argument that consolidating local monopoly power on a nationwide basis will benefit consumers," said Turner. "Indeed, the issue of the cable industry's power to harm online video competition, which is what ultimately sank Comcast's consolidation plans, are very much at play in this deal."
A chief argument for those opposing the deal, in fact, will be that bigger does not mean better when it comes to providing quality cable and internet service. "Charter needs to explain why this consolidation will improve competition," concluded Turner, "and a simple argument of scale won't work here. Charter's network is already superior to TWC's and that of other large cable companies, which proves that you don't need to become a colossus to succeed in this business."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Charter Communications, currently the fourth-largest cable television company in the United States, has confirmed a deal that would see it purchase Time Warner Cable, the nation's second-largest cable and internet company, for approximately $55 billion in cash and stock.
As Bloomberg notes, if the deal is ultimately allowed to go through, it would allow "Charter, whose largest shareholder is billionaire John Malone, to almost quadruple its number of cable subscribers, gaining 12 million customers in cities including New York, Los Angeles and Dallas." Charter also confirmed that as part of its acquisition place it plans to buy a smaller cable company, Bright House Networks, for $10.4 billion.
If approved, the mega-merger would make Charter second in size only to Comcast, which itself recently abandoned an attempt to acquire TWC after a groundswell of public opposition and strong signals from federal anti-trust officials and the Federal Communications Commission that such a large company would present monopoly concerns and violate the public interest.
Responding to the news, the media watchdog group Free Press on Tuesday said there is little difference between Charter's bid and that consumers will see no benefit at all from its purchase of TWC.
"Ultimately, this merger is yet another example of the poor incentives Wall Street's quarterly-result mentality creates," said S. Derek Turner, the group's research director. "Charter would rather take on an enormous amount of debt to pay a premium for Time Warner Cable than build fiber infrastructure, improve service for its existing customers or bring competition into new communities."
According to the Washington Post:
Regulators had moved to block Comcast's merger with Time Warner Cable because of concern over the market for broadband Internet service. Together, Comcast and Time Warner Cable would have controlled more than 50 percent of all broadband connections in the United States, with more than 34 million subscribers. Charter's purchase of Time Warner Cable would create a bigger cable firm, and a stronger rival to Comcast and a combined AT&T and DirecTV.
Comcast's ownership of vast media properties through NBC Universal also posed problems for regulators. Critics were also concerned about Comcast's bid for Time Warner Cable because of the company's potential ability to use its powerful hold on so many home subscribers to create a disadvantage for online video rivals such as Netflix and YouTube that compete with its cable TV and media properties.
"It appears much less of an antitrust concern than the Comcast deal," said Gene Kimmelman, a former senior antitrust official for the Justice Department and current president of Public Knowledge, a nonprofit group. "It is more likely to face [Federal Communications Commission] scrutiny for how it actually promotes the public interest."
In an initial tweet expressing exasperation with the such mega-mergers, Free Press said on Monday:
Though public outrage, led by groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge, played a key role in blocking the Comcast/TWC deal, there's no guarantee that this latest attempt to create a new cable giant will ultimately be frowned upon by government regulators. As the Wall Street Journal reports:
The backlash to Comcast's bid for Time Warner Cable at the Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department left many cable executives and investors wondering whether any transformational cable-industry deal could withstand regulatory review.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler called cable executives including Time Warner Cable's Mr. Marcus and Charter CEO Tom Rutledge in recent days to convey that they shouldn't assume the agency is against any and all future deals just because of what happened with Comcast, according to a person familiar with the matter.
However, Free Press' Turner said that his group will oppose the deal with the same gusto as it did Comcast's.
"Charter will have a tough time making a credible argument that consolidating local monopoly power on a nationwide basis will benefit consumers," said Turner. "Indeed, the issue of the cable industry's power to harm online video competition, which is what ultimately sank Comcast's consolidation plans, are very much at play in this deal."
A chief argument for those opposing the deal, in fact, will be that bigger does not mean better when it comes to providing quality cable and internet service. "Charter needs to explain why this consolidation will improve competition," concluded Turner, "and a simple argument of scale won't work here. Charter's network is already superior to TWC's and that of other large cable companies, which proves that you don't need to become a colossus to succeed in this business."
Charter Communications, currently the fourth-largest cable television company in the United States, has confirmed a deal that would see it purchase Time Warner Cable, the nation's second-largest cable and internet company, for approximately $55 billion in cash and stock.
As Bloomberg notes, if the deal is ultimately allowed to go through, it would allow "Charter, whose largest shareholder is billionaire John Malone, to almost quadruple its number of cable subscribers, gaining 12 million customers in cities including New York, Los Angeles and Dallas." Charter also confirmed that as part of its acquisition place it plans to buy a smaller cable company, Bright House Networks, for $10.4 billion.
If approved, the mega-merger would make Charter second in size only to Comcast, which itself recently abandoned an attempt to acquire TWC after a groundswell of public opposition and strong signals from federal anti-trust officials and the Federal Communications Commission that such a large company would present monopoly concerns and violate the public interest.
Responding to the news, the media watchdog group Free Press on Tuesday said there is little difference between Charter's bid and that consumers will see no benefit at all from its purchase of TWC.
"Ultimately, this merger is yet another example of the poor incentives Wall Street's quarterly-result mentality creates," said S. Derek Turner, the group's research director. "Charter would rather take on an enormous amount of debt to pay a premium for Time Warner Cable than build fiber infrastructure, improve service for its existing customers or bring competition into new communities."
According to the Washington Post:
Regulators had moved to block Comcast's merger with Time Warner Cable because of concern over the market for broadband Internet service. Together, Comcast and Time Warner Cable would have controlled more than 50 percent of all broadband connections in the United States, with more than 34 million subscribers. Charter's purchase of Time Warner Cable would create a bigger cable firm, and a stronger rival to Comcast and a combined AT&T and DirecTV.
Comcast's ownership of vast media properties through NBC Universal also posed problems for regulators. Critics were also concerned about Comcast's bid for Time Warner Cable because of the company's potential ability to use its powerful hold on so many home subscribers to create a disadvantage for online video rivals such as Netflix and YouTube that compete with its cable TV and media properties.
"It appears much less of an antitrust concern than the Comcast deal," said Gene Kimmelman, a former senior antitrust official for the Justice Department and current president of Public Knowledge, a nonprofit group. "It is more likely to face [Federal Communications Commission] scrutiny for how it actually promotes the public interest."
In an initial tweet expressing exasperation with the such mega-mergers, Free Press said on Monday:
Though public outrage, led by groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge, played a key role in blocking the Comcast/TWC deal, there's no guarantee that this latest attempt to create a new cable giant will ultimately be frowned upon by government regulators. As the Wall Street Journal reports:
The backlash to Comcast's bid for Time Warner Cable at the Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department left many cable executives and investors wondering whether any transformational cable-industry deal could withstand regulatory review.
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler called cable executives including Time Warner Cable's Mr. Marcus and Charter CEO Tom Rutledge in recent days to convey that they shouldn't assume the agency is against any and all future deals just because of what happened with Comcast, according to a person familiar with the matter.
However, Free Press' Turner said that his group will oppose the deal with the same gusto as it did Comcast's.
"Charter will have a tough time making a credible argument that consolidating local monopoly power on a nationwide basis will benefit consumers," said Turner. "Indeed, the issue of the cable industry's power to harm online video competition, which is what ultimately sank Comcast's consolidation plans, are very much at play in this deal."
A chief argument for those opposing the deal, in fact, will be that bigger does not mean better when it comes to providing quality cable and internet service. "Charter needs to explain why this consolidation will improve competition," concluded Turner, "and a simple argument of scale won't work here. Charter's network is already superior to TWC's and that of other large cable companies, which proves that you don't need to become a colossus to succeed in this business."