Farmers in California have agreed to cut back on their water usage voluntarily to avoid steeper mandatory cutbacks imposed by the state. (Photo: General Physics Laboratory/flickr/cc)
May 24, 2015
A day before California accepted voluntary water cutbacks by farmers, vandals targeting an inflatable dam in Fremont sent 50 million gallons of water meant for the city's residents flowing into the San Francisco Bay.
"This is a very significant loss of water under any circumstances, and more so in the drought conditions we are experiencing," Robert Shaver, the Alameda County water district general manager, told the Oakland Tribune on Thursday. "It is an utterly senseless, destructive, and wasteful thing to do."
According to the ACWD, the lost water could have supplied 500 homes for a year.
The loss is the latest setback for the state, which is in the midst of a historic four-year drought that has led to Governor Jerry Brown imposing mandatory water cutbacks on urban consumers for the first time ever.
Brown's order has gotten a lukewarm reception in the state--not for the loss of green lawns, but for its exemption of the agricultural industry, which consumes 80 percent of California's water.
After weeks of public outcry over the lopsided order, the state water board announced Friday that it had accepted a deal from farmers to cut back their water usage by 25 percent.
Scores of farmers made the deal to stave off stricter mandatory cuts, which the water board said it would impose if the two sides could not reach a deal. The plan applies only to riparian rights holders--landowners who have direct access to a river or stream.
The LA Timesreports:
In a move reflecting the growing severity of California's drought, state water regulators have accepted a historic proposal by Delta region farmers to voluntarily cut water usage by 25%, or, alternatively, to allow a quarter of their fields to lay idle.
...Under the plan, growers must submit online applications to the water board by June 1, and outline how they will reduce water usage relative to their 2013 levels. If approved, the voluntary restrictions will remain in place through September, ending Oct. 1.
Since the plan is voluntary, it remains to be seen how many farmers will participate--which, in turn, makes it hard to guess how much water will be saved by the effort. Still, conservationists in the state say it is better than nothing.
"It is a sign that creative solutions to the drought are possible and that everyone must make sacrifices, whether it's cutting back on watering our yards or laying some crops fallow," Brian Stranko, director of the Nature Conservancy's water program, told the LA Times.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A day before California accepted voluntary water cutbacks by farmers, vandals targeting an inflatable dam in Fremont sent 50 million gallons of water meant for the city's residents flowing into the San Francisco Bay.
"This is a very significant loss of water under any circumstances, and more so in the drought conditions we are experiencing," Robert Shaver, the Alameda County water district general manager, told the Oakland Tribune on Thursday. "It is an utterly senseless, destructive, and wasteful thing to do."
According to the ACWD, the lost water could have supplied 500 homes for a year.
The loss is the latest setback for the state, which is in the midst of a historic four-year drought that has led to Governor Jerry Brown imposing mandatory water cutbacks on urban consumers for the first time ever.
Brown's order has gotten a lukewarm reception in the state--not for the loss of green lawns, but for its exemption of the agricultural industry, which consumes 80 percent of California's water.
After weeks of public outcry over the lopsided order, the state water board announced Friday that it had accepted a deal from farmers to cut back their water usage by 25 percent.
Scores of farmers made the deal to stave off stricter mandatory cuts, which the water board said it would impose if the two sides could not reach a deal. The plan applies only to riparian rights holders--landowners who have direct access to a river or stream.
The LA Timesreports:
In a move reflecting the growing severity of California's drought, state water regulators have accepted a historic proposal by Delta region farmers to voluntarily cut water usage by 25%, or, alternatively, to allow a quarter of their fields to lay idle.
...Under the plan, growers must submit online applications to the water board by June 1, and outline how they will reduce water usage relative to their 2013 levels. If approved, the voluntary restrictions will remain in place through September, ending Oct. 1.
Since the plan is voluntary, it remains to be seen how many farmers will participate--which, in turn, makes it hard to guess how much water will be saved by the effort. Still, conservationists in the state say it is better than nothing.
"It is a sign that creative solutions to the drought are possible and that everyone must make sacrifices, whether it's cutting back on watering our yards or laying some crops fallow," Brian Stranko, director of the Nature Conservancy's water program, told the LA Times.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
A day before California accepted voluntary water cutbacks by farmers, vandals targeting an inflatable dam in Fremont sent 50 million gallons of water meant for the city's residents flowing into the San Francisco Bay.
"This is a very significant loss of water under any circumstances, and more so in the drought conditions we are experiencing," Robert Shaver, the Alameda County water district general manager, told the Oakland Tribune on Thursday. "It is an utterly senseless, destructive, and wasteful thing to do."
According to the ACWD, the lost water could have supplied 500 homes for a year.
The loss is the latest setback for the state, which is in the midst of a historic four-year drought that has led to Governor Jerry Brown imposing mandatory water cutbacks on urban consumers for the first time ever.
Brown's order has gotten a lukewarm reception in the state--not for the loss of green lawns, but for its exemption of the agricultural industry, which consumes 80 percent of California's water.
After weeks of public outcry over the lopsided order, the state water board announced Friday that it had accepted a deal from farmers to cut back their water usage by 25 percent.
Scores of farmers made the deal to stave off stricter mandatory cuts, which the water board said it would impose if the two sides could not reach a deal. The plan applies only to riparian rights holders--landowners who have direct access to a river or stream.
The LA Timesreports:
In a move reflecting the growing severity of California's drought, state water regulators have accepted a historic proposal by Delta region farmers to voluntarily cut water usage by 25%, or, alternatively, to allow a quarter of their fields to lay idle.
...Under the plan, growers must submit online applications to the water board by June 1, and outline how they will reduce water usage relative to their 2013 levels. If approved, the voluntary restrictions will remain in place through September, ending Oct. 1.
Since the plan is voluntary, it remains to be seen how many farmers will participate--which, in turn, makes it hard to guess how much water will be saved by the effort. Still, conservationists in the state say it is better than nothing.
"It is a sign that creative solutions to the drought are possible and that everyone must make sacrifices, whether it's cutting back on watering our yards or laying some crops fallow," Brian Stranko, director of the Nature Conservancy's water program, told the LA Times.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.