Rights Groups Take UK Government to Court Over 'Unfettered and Unprecedented' Spying
Organizations hope Brtish spy agency 'is finally held accountable for its unfettered spying on the world’s communications.'
A group of human rights organizations has taken the UK government to Europe's top human rights court to challenge what they characterize as "unfettered" and "unprecedented" surveillance practices revealed by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.
The ten organizations, which include Privacy International, the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, Liberty, and Bytes for All, announced their latest legal action against the surveillance on Friday, charging that the PRISM, UPSTREAM, and TEMPORA programs violate rights as outlined in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The court application (pdf) states that the groups
are concerned with mass bulk interception, collection, inspection, distribution and retention of communications on a vast, unprecedented scale. The process involves hundreds of millions of communications and takes place without any judicial authorization.
The UK Government carries out such activity itself. It also receives the product of such activity carried out by the US Government.
"The UK government's surveillance practices have been allowed to continue unabated and on an unprecedented scale, with major consequences for people's privacy and freedom of expression," Nick Williams, Amnesty International's Legal Counsel, said in a media statement. "No one is above the law and the European Court of Human Rights now has a chance to make that clear," he stated.
The groups' legal effort was prompted by a December ruling by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), a watchdog for UK intelligence agencies, which found that the UK's surveillance programs do not violate human rights.
In their application to the Strasbourg court, filed last week, the groups state that the IPT erred in its ruling, as the programs, in fact, violate their Convention-enshrined rights to privacy and freedom of expression, and that the IPT failed to offer the groups a fair hearing.
"It is ridiculous that the government has been allowed to rely on the existence of secret policies and procedures discussed with the Tribunal behind closed doors--to demonstrate that it is being legally transparent," Williams added.
With no further legal avenues within the UK, the groups were forced to go to the European Court of Human Rights--a forum that "has a strong history of ensuring intelligence agencies are compliant with human rights law," stated Carly Nyst, Legal Director of Privacy International. She added that the groups hope that the GCHQ, the NSA's British counterpart, "is finally held accountable for its unfettered spying on the world's communications."
The group also acknowledge that it is only because of Snowden's actions that these surveillance programs have come to light.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A group of human rights organizations has taken the UK government to Europe's top human rights court to challenge what they characterize as "unfettered" and "unprecedented" surveillance practices revealed by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.
The ten organizations, which include Privacy International, the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, Liberty, and Bytes for All, announced their latest legal action against the surveillance on Friday, charging that the PRISM, UPSTREAM, and TEMPORA programs violate rights as outlined in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The court application (pdf) states that the groups
are concerned with mass bulk interception, collection, inspection, distribution and retention of communications on a vast, unprecedented scale. The process involves hundreds of millions of communications and takes place without any judicial authorization.
The UK Government carries out such activity itself. It also receives the product of such activity carried out by the US Government.
"The UK government's surveillance practices have been allowed to continue unabated and on an unprecedented scale, with major consequences for people's privacy and freedom of expression," Nick Williams, Amnesty International's Legal Counsel, said in a media statement. "No one is above the law and the European Court of Human Rights now has a chance to make that clear," he stated.
The groups' legal effort was prompted by a December ruling by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), a watchdog for UK intelligence agencies, which found that the UK's surveillance programs do not violate human rights.
In their application to the Strasbourg court, filed last week, the groups state that the IPT erred in its ruling, as the programs, in fact, violate their Convention-enshrined rights to privacy and freedom of expression, and that the IPT failed to offer the groups a fair hearing.
"It is ridiculous that the government has been allowed to rely on the existence of secret policies and procedures discussed with the Tribunal behind closed doors--to demonstrate that it is being legally transparent," Williams added.
With no further legal avenues within the UK, the groups were forced to go to the European Court of Human Rights--a forum that "has a strong history of ensuring intelligence agencies are compliant with human rights law," stated Carly Nyst, Legal Director of Privacy International. She added that the groups hope that the GCHQ, the NSA's British counterpart, "is finally held accountable for its unfettered spying on the world's communications."
The group also acknowledge that it is only because of Snowden's actions that these surveillance programs have come to light.
A group of human rights organizations has taken the UK government to Europe's top human rights court to challenge what they characterize as "unfettered" and "unprecedented" surveillance practices revealed by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden.
The ten organizations, which include Privacy International, the American Civil Liberties Union, Amnesty International, Liberty, and Bytes for All, announced their latest legal action against the surveillance on Friday, charging that the PRISM, UPSTREAM, and TEMPORA programs violate rights as outlined in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The court application (pdf) states that the groups
are concerned with mass bulk interception, collection, inspection, distribution and retention of communications on a vast, unprecedented scale. The process involves hundreds of millions of communications and takes place without any judicial authorization.
The UK Government carries out such activity itself. It also receives the product of such activity carried out by the US Government.
"The UK government's surveillance practices have been allowed to continue unabated and on an unprecedented scale, with major consequences for people's privacy and freedom of expression," Nick Williams, Amnesty International's Legal Counsel, said in a media statement. "No one is above the law and the European Court of Human Rights now has a chance to make that clear," he stated.
The groups' legal effort was prompted by a December ruling by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), a watchdog for UK intelligence agencies, which found that the UK's surveillance programs do not violate human rights.
In their application to the Strasbourg court, filed last week, the groups state that the IPT erred in its ruling, as the programs, in fact, violate their Convention-enshrined rights to privacy and freedom of expression, and that the IPT failed to offer the groups a fair hearing.
"It is ridiculous that the government has been allowed to rely on the existence of secret policies and procedures discussed with the Tribunal behind closed doors--to demonstrate that it is being legally transparent," Williams added.
With no further legal avenues within the UK, the groups were forced to go to the European Court of Human Rights--a forum that "has a strong history of ensuring intelligence agencies are compliant with human rights law," stated Carly Nyst, Legal Director of Privacy International. She added that the groups hope that the GCHQ, the NSA's British counterpart, "is finally held accountable for its unfettered spying on the world's communications."
The group also acknowledge that it is only because of Snowden's actions that these surveillance programs have come to light.