

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Government watchdogs are raising ethics concerns that Dan Poneman, who served for years as a high-ranking Department of Energy official, has just taken a job as president and CEO of a nuclear enrichment company that has long received special treatment from the federal government, including on his watch.
During his tenure as Deputy Secretary of Energy from 2009 to 2014 (including a brief stint as Acting Energy Secretary), Poneman was a strong advocate of nuclear power, touting it as a reliable energy source and a possible solution to the climate crisis.
Also during Poneman's reign, Centrus Energy Corp., known formerly as U.S. Enrichment Corp., was a major beneficiary of federal deals.
In fact, the DOE was accused (pdf) by the Government Accountability Office of breaking laws by conducting four uranium transfers in 2012 and 2013 to favor the company, which enriches uranium for the U.S. military and the nuclear industry.
However, this censure did not stop Washington's revolving doors from spinning.
Centrus Energy Corp. announced that Poneman "has been selected by its Board of Directors as president and chief executive officer of the Company." The gig pays up to $1.7 million a year, according to Politico reporter Darius Dixon.
But even while ethics rules will prohibit Poneman from contacting the DOE directly for two years, watchdogs say the shuffle still stinks.
Tyson Slocum, director of the energy program for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, told Environment & Energy Publishing that this is one of the most dramatic examples of Washington's revolving door he's ever seen.
"This doesn't really pass the smell test," he said. "You're putting a top former government official in charge of the company; it's safe to say his appointment as CEO is all about maximizing their influence with key federal officials for all types of federal support."
Ed Lyman, a senior scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, told Politico he agrees. "The lobbying aside, it's really just the appearance that this job was some sort of reward for the favorable treatment they were getting from DOE. It's just that appearance that needs to be respected."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Government watchdogs are raising ethics concerns that Dan Poneman, who served for years as a high-ranking Department of Energy official, has just taken a job as president and CEO of a nuclear enrichment company that has long received special treatment from the federal government, including on his watch.
During his tenure as Deputy Secretary of Energy from 2009 to 2014 (including a brief stint as Acting Energy Secretary), Poneman was a strong advocate of nuclear power, touting it as a reliable energy source and a possible solution to the climate crisis.
Also during Poneman's reign, Centrus Energy Corp., known formerly as U.S. Enrichment Corp., was a major beneficiary of federal deals.
In fact, the DOE was accused (pdf) by the Government Accountability Office of breaking laws by conducting four uranium transfers in 2012 and 2013 to favor the company, which enriches uranium for the U.S. military and the nuclear industry.
However, this censure did not stop Washington's revolving doors from spinning.
Centrus Energy Corp. announced that Poneman "has been selected by its Board of Directors as president and chief executive officer of the Company." The gig pays up to $1.7 million a year, according to Politico reporter Darius Dixon.
But even while ethics rules will prohibit Poneman from contacting the DOE directly for two years, watchdogs say the shuffle still stinks.
Tyson Slocum, director of the energy program for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, told Environment & Energy Publishing that this is one of the most dramatic examples of Washington's revolving door he's ever seen.
"This doesn't really pass the smell test," he said. "You're putting a top former government official in charge of the company; it's safe to say his appointment as CEO is all about maximizing their influence with key federal officials for all types of federal support."
Ed Lyman, a senior scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, told Politico he agrees. "The lobbying aside, it's really just the appearance that this job was some sort of reward for the favorable treatment they were getting from DOE. It's just that appearance that needs to be respected."
Government watchdogs are raising ethics concerns that Dan Poneman, who served for years as a high-ranking Department of Energy official, has just taken a job as president and CEO of a nuclear enrichment company that has long received special treatment from the federal government, including on his watch.
During his tenure as Deputy Secretary of Energy from 2009 to 2014 (including a brief stint as Acting Energy Secretary), Poneman was a strong advocate of nuclear power, touting it as a reliable energy source and a possible solution to the climate crisis.
Also during Poneman's reign, Centrus Energy Corp., known formerly as U.S. Enrichment Corp., was a major beneficiary of federal deals.
In fact, the DOE was accused (pdf) by the Government Accountability Office of breaking laws by conducting four uranium transfers in 2012 and 2013 to favor the company, which enriches uranium for the U.S. military and the nuclear industry.
However, this censure did not stop Washington's revolving doors from spinning.
Centrus Energy Corp. announced that Poneman "has been selected by its Board of Directors as president and chief executive officer of the Company." The gig pays up to $1.7 million a year, according to Politico reporter Darius Dixon.
But even while ethics rules will prohibit Poneman from contacting the DOE directly for two years, watchdogs say the shuffle still stinks.
Tyson Slocum, director of the energy program for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, told Environment & Energy Publishing that this is one of the most dramatic examples of Washington's revolving door he's ever seen.
"This doesn't really pass the smell test," he said. "You're putting a top former government official in charge of the company; it's safe to say his appointment as CEO is all about maximizing their influence with key federal officials for all types of federal support."
Ed Lyman, a senior scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, told Politico he agrees. "The lobbying aside, it's really just the appearance that this job was some sort of reward for the favorable treatment they were getting from DOE. It's just that appearance that needs to be respected."