

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A political declaration from the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, aimed at achieving global gender equality by 2030, "lacks ambition," according to nearly 1,000 women's rights and feminist organizations from around the world.
In the document, which was formally adopted on Monday, world governments pledge to: bolster implementation of laws related to gender equality; bolster institutions vital to women's empowerment; transform discriminatory norms and stereotypes; close resource gaps; boost accountability; and enhance capacities and data to track progress.
"The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels."
--Lydia Alpizar, Association for Women's Rights in Development
But a coalition of groups working to advance the human rights of women and girls say the declaration is milquetoast and must be strengthened.
"The text of the political declaration is weak and does not go far enough towards the transformative change that is needed for gender equality," said Lydia Alpizar, executive director of the Association for Women's Rights in Development, in a speech Monday. "We, women of the world in all our diversity, deserve much better than this. We deserve that you put aside your ideological, political and religious differences and fully recognize and affirm the human rights of women and girls and gender justice. Nothing less."
A joint statement issued by 974 groups blasts the UN declaration as "a bland reaffirmation of existing commitments" that "threatens a major step backward" in the realm of women's rights. The organizations also decry the lack of transparency around the crafting of the declaration, which they claim is the result of "several months of closed-door negotiations" from which women's groups were largely excluded.
"[M]any of the gains that women and girls have made are under threat and women and girls worldwide face extraordinary and unprecedented challenges, including economic inequality, climate change and ocean acidification, and rising, violent fundamentalisms," reads the statement. "At a time when urgent action is needed to fully realize gender equality, the human rights and empowerment of women and girls, we need renewed commitment, a heightened level of ambition, real resources, and accountability."
Specifically, the groups are calling for stronger language that:
Even Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, who heads UN Women--the standing body that oversees the Commission on the Status of Women--acknowledged portions of the critique even as she championed the goals of the declaration.
"Yes, much has been done, and much of it worthwhile. However, what we chose to prioritize and act on has not led to irreversible and deep-rooted change," she said in her opening speech to the Commission.
Her remarks echo the findings of a UN Women report (pdf), also issued Monday, which declares that 20 years after the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action--which stated that "women's empowerment and their full participation on the basis of equality in all spheres of society, including participation in the decision-making process and access to power, are fundamental for the achievement of equality, development and peace"--progress has been spotty to say the least.
"Twenty years on, it is a hard truth that many of the same barriers and constraints that were recognized by the Beijing signatories are still in force globally," Mlambo-Ngcuka wrote in the report's introduction. "Change has not been deep enough, nor comprehensive, and it is not irreversible."
Alpizar, of the Association for Women's Rights in Development, was more scathing in her assessment:
"[T]oday we must acknowledge that progress achieved has been very limited," she said before the Commission. "The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels."
She concluded: "This is the moment; there are important opportunities before us. This is the moment when we must have all resources needed--the political commitment and the action--to achieve real transformations."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A political declaration from the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, aimed at achieving global gender equality by 2030, "lacks ambition," according to nearly 1,000 women's rights and feminist organizations from around the world.
In the document, which was formally adopted on Monday, world governments pledge to: bolster implementation of laws related to gender equality; bolster institutions vital to women's empowerment; transform discriminatory norms and stereotypes; close resource gaps; boost accountability; and enhance capacities and data to track progress.
"The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels."
--Lydia Alpizar, Association for Women's Rights in Development
But a coalition of groups working to advance the human rights of women and girls say the declaration is milquetoast and must be strengthened.
"The text of the political declaration is weak and does not go far enough towards the transformative change that is needed for gender equality," said Lydia Alpizar, executive director of the Association for Women's Rights in Development, in a speech Monday. "We, women of the world in all our diversity, deserve much better than this. We deserve that you put aside your ideological, political and religious differences and fully recognize and affirm the human rights of women and girls and gender justice. Nothing less."
A joint statement issued by 974 groups blasts the UN declaration as "a bland reaffirmation of existing commitments" that "threatens a major step backward" in the realm of women's rights. The organizations also decry the lack of transparency around the crafting of the declaration, which they claim is the result of "several months of closed-door negotiations" from which women's groups were largely excluded.
"[M]any of the gains that women and girls have made are under threat and women and girls worldwide face extraordinary and unprecedented challenges, including economic inequality, climate change and ocean acidification, and rising, violent fundamentalisms," reads the statement. "At a time when urgent action is needed to fully realize gender equality, the human rights and empowerment of women and girls, we need renewed commitment, a heightened level of ambition, real resources, and accountability."
Specifically, the groups are calling for stronger language that:
Even Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, who heads UN Women--the standing body that oversees the Commission on the Status of Women--acknowledged portions of the critique even as she championed the goals of the declaration.
"Yes, much has been done, and much of it worthwhile. However, what we chose to prioritize and act on has not led to irreversible and deep-rooted change," she said in her opening speech to the Commission.
Her remarks echo the findings of a UN Women report (pdf), also issued Monday, which declares that 20 years after the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action--which stated that "women's empowerment and their full participation on the basis of equality in all spheres of society, including participation in the decision-making process and access to power, are fundamental for the achievement of equality, development and peace"--progress has been spotty to say the least.
"Twenty years on, it is a hard truth that many of the same barriers and constraints that were recognized by the Beijing signatories are still in force globally," Mlambo-Ngcuka wrote in the report's introduction. "Change has not been deep enough, nor comprehensive, and it is not irreversible."
Alpizar, of the Association for Women's Rights in Development, was more scathing in her assessment:
"[T]oday we must acknowledge that progress achieved has been very limited," she said before the Commission. "The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels."
She concluded: "This is the moment; there are important opportunities before us. This is the moment when we must have all resources needed--the political commitment and the action--to achieve real transformations."
A political declaration from the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, aimed at achieving global gender equality by 2030, "lacks ambition," according to nearly 1,000 women's rights and feminist organizations from around the world.
In the document, which was formally adopted on Monday, world governments pledge to: bolster implementation of laws related to gender equality; bolster institutions vital to women's empowerment; transform discriminatory norms and stereotypes; close resource gaps; boost accountability; and enhance capacities and data to track progress.
"The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels."
--Lydia Alpizar, Association for Women's Rights in Development
But a coalition of groups working to advance the human rights of women and girls say the declaration is milquetoast and must be strengthened.
"The text of the political declaration is weak and does not go far enough towards the transformative change that is needed for gender equality," said Lydia Alpizar, executive director of the Association for Women's Rights in Development, in a speech Monday. "We, women of the world in all our diversity, deserve much better than this. We deserve that you put aside your ideological, political and religious differences and fully recognize and affirm the human rights of women and girls and gender justice. Nothing less."
A joint statement issued by 974 groups blasts the UN declaration as "a bland reaffirmation of existing commitments" that "threatens a major step backward" in the realm of women's rights. The organizations also decry the lack of transparency around the crafting of the declaration, which they claim is the result of "several months of closed-door negotiations" from which women's groups were largely excluded.
"[M]any of the gains that women and girls have made are under threat and women and girls worldwide face extraordinary and unprecedented challenges, including economic inequality, climate change and ocean acidification, and rising, violent fundamentalisms," reads the statement. "At a time when urgent action is needed to fully realize gender equality, the human rights and empowerment of women and girls, we need renewed commitment, a heightened level of ambition, real resources, and accountability."
Specifically, the groups are calling for stronger language that:
Even Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, who heads UN Women--the standing body that oversees the Commission on the Status of Women--acknowledged portions of the critique even as she championed the goals of the declaration.
"Yes, much has been done, and much of it worthwhile. However, what we chose to prioritize and act on has not led to irreversible and deep-rooted change," she said in her opening speech to the Commission.
Her remarks echo the findings of a UN Women report (pdf), also issued Monday, which declares that 20 years after the adoption of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action--which stated that "women's empowerment and their full participation on the basis of equality in all spheres of society, including participation in the decision-making process and access to power, are fundamental for the achievement of equality, development and peace"--progress has been spotty to say the least.
"Twenty years on, it is a hard truth that many of the same barriers and constraints that were recognized by the Beijing signatories are still in force globally," Mlambo-Ngcuka wrote in the report's introduction. "Change has not been deep enough, nor comprehensive, and it is not irreversible."
Alpizar, of the Association for Women's Rights in Development, was more scathing in her assessment:
"[T]oday we must acknowledge that progress achieved has been very limited," she said before the Commission. "The overwhelming lack of political commitment and financial resources, plain old sexism and misogyny, along with increasing religious fundamentalisms have affected the quality of the agreements produced by governments within the UN and at other levels."
She concluded: "This is the moment; there are important opportunities before us. This is the moment when we must have all resources needed--the political commitment and the action--to achieve real transformations."