Animal rights supporters hold up signs at a pork expo protest in June 2012. (Photo: Justin Norman/flickr/cc)
Utah's 'Ag-Gag' Law May Have Found First Legal Targets
Animal rights group vows to challenge 'shameful,' 'unconstitutional' law barring factory farm investigations
Four animal rights activists from California are likely to be the first ever defendants charged under Utah's so-called "ag gag" law, which prohibits undercover investigations and recordings of animals in factory farms.
Robert Penney, Sarah Jane Hardt, Harold Weiss, and Bryan Monell were charged in late September 2014 in Utah's Iron County court for agricultural operation interference--the "ag gag" law--and criminal trespassing on agricultural land.
The activists, who are associated with the Farm Animals Rights Movement, told the Salt Lake Tribune Tuesday that they had planned to document the journey of a truckload of pigs from Utah's Circle Four farm in Milford to a slaughterhouse in Los Angeles--which is legal even under the agricultural operation interference law.
"The purpose of our trip was to photograph the farm legally," Sarah Jane Hardt said, "and to follow and track the pigs on their journey back. It's about a nine-hour journey."
Attorney T. Matthew Phillips, who is representing all four defendants, reiterated that the plan was to document the "trail of tears" between the farm and the slaughterhouse. The activists did not trespass onto the farm, but rather took photographs from the side of the road outside of the property, Phillips said.
Local authorities detained the group without arrest. After five hours, they were given citations, Hardt said. "We didn't violate the law in any way," she told the Tribune.
Animal rights advocates charge that the law not only punishes whistleblowers, it shields the abusive corporate agriculture industry. PETA Director of Litigation Matthew Strugar told Common Dreams, "It's shameful that in a once-free country, 'ag-gag' legislation has been introduced to benefit industries at the expense of animals and consumers."
According to Phillips, the law is unconstitutional. "[I]t targets only the would-be whistleblowers and benefits only the special interests."
Strugar echoed that point, adding, "Legislators should instead be passing laws to require cameras on all factory farms and in all slaughterhouses and to catch animal abusers, such as those who have been caught in undercover investigations--including sadistic workers who kicked pigs in the head or spray-painted them in the nostrils, stomped on and threw chickens and turkeys like footballs, smashed piglets' heads against concrete floors, and beat and sexually assaulted pigs with steel gate rods and hard plastic herding canes."
"Once again, 'ag-gag' laws prove only that factory farms and slaughterhouses have something to hide," Strugar said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Four animal rights activists from California are likely to be the first ever defendants charged under Utah's so-called "ag gag" law, which prohibits undercover investigations and recordings of animals in factory farms.
Robert Penney, Sarah Jane Hardt, Harold Weiss, and Bryan Monell were charged in late September 2014 in Utah's Iron County court for agricultural operation interference--the "ag gag" law--and criminal trespassing on agricultural land.
The activists, who are associated with the Farm Animals Rights Movement, told the Salt Lake Tribune Tuesday that they had planned to document the journey of a truckload of pigs from Utah's Circle Four farm in Milford to a slaughterhouse in Los Angeles--which is legal even under the agricultural operation interference law.
"The purpose of our trip was to photograph the farm legally," Sarah Jane Hardt said, "and to follow and track the pigs on their journey back. It's about a nine-hour journey."
Attorney T. Matthew Phillips, who is representing all four defendants, reiterated that the plan was to document the "trail of tears" between the farm and the slaughterhouse. The activists did not trespass onto the farm, but rather took photographs from the side of the road outside of the property, Phillips said.
Local authorities detained the group without arrest. After five hours, they were given citations, Hardt said. "We didn't violate the law in any way," she told the Tribune.
Animal rights advocates charge that the law not only punishes whistleblowers, it shields the abusive corporate agriculture industry. PETA Director of Litigation Matthew Strugar told Common Dreams, "It's shameful that in a once-free country, 'ag-gag' legislation has been introduced to benefit industries at the expense of animals and consumers."
According to Phillips, the law is unconstitutional. "[I]t targets only the would-be whistleblowers and benefits only the special interests."
Strugar echoed that point, adding, "Legislators should instead be passing laws to require cameras on all factory farms and in all slaughterhouses and to catch animal abusers, such as those who have been caught in undercover investigations--including sadistic workers who kicked pigs in the head or spray-painted them in the nostrils, stomped on and threw chickens and turkeys like footballs, smashed piglets' heads against concrete floors, and beat and sexually assaulted pigs with steel gate rods and hard plastic herding canes."
"Once again, 'ag-gag' laws prove only that factory farms and slaughterhouses have something to hide," Strugar said.
Four animal rights activists from California are likely to be the first ever defendants charged under Utah's so-called "ag gag" law, which prohibits undercover investigations and recordings of animals in factory farms.
Robert Penney, Sarah Jane Hardt, Harold Weiss, and Bryan Monell were charged in late September 2014 in Utah's Iron County court for agricultural operation interference--the "ag gag" law--and criminal trespassing on agricultural land.
The activists, who are associated with the Farm Animals Rights Movement, told the Salt Lake Tribune Tuesday that they had planned to document the journey of a truckload of pigs from Utah's Circle Four farm in Milford to a slaughterhouse in Los Angeles--which is legal even under the agricultural operation interference law.
"The purpose of our trip was to photograph the farm legally," Sarah Jane Hardt said, "and to follow and track the pigs on their journey back. It's about a nine-hour journey."
Attorney T. Matthew Phillips, who is representing all four defendants, reiterated that the plan was to document the "trail of tears" between the farm and the slaughterhouse. The activists did not trespass onto the farm, but rather took photographs from the side of the road outside of the property, Phillips said.
Local authorities detained the group without arrest. After five hours, they were given citations, Hardt said. "We didn't violate the law in any way," she told the Tribune.
Animal rights advocates charge that the law not only punishes whistleblowers, it shields the abusive corporate agriculture industry. PETA Director of Litigation Matthew Strugar told Common Dreams, "It's shameful that in a once-free country, 'ag-gag' legislation has been introduced to benefit industries at the expense of animals and consumers."
According to Phillips, the law is unconstitutional. "[I]t targets only the would-be whistleblowers and benefits only the special interests."
Strugar echoed that point, adding, "Legislators should instead be passing laws to require cameras on all factory farms and in all slaughterhouses and to catch animal abusers, such as those who have been caught in undercover investigations--including sadistic workers who kicked pigs in the head or spray-painted them in the nostrils, stomped on and threw chickens and turkeys like footballs, smashed piglets' heads against concrete floors, and beat and sexually assaulted pigs with steel gate rods and hard plastic herding canes."
"Once again, 'ag-gag' laws prove only that factory farms and slaughterhouses have something to hide," Strugar said.