SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Activists gather outside of Capitol Hill to protest the Keystone XL pipeline. (Photo: 350.org/flickr/cc)
Keystone XL Pipeline at Top of GOP Agenda in 2015
Senate committee hearing set for next week
Dec 31, 2014
The U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is set to hold a hearing next week to discuss the Keystone XL pipeline.
The hearing will take place on January 7, once Republicans retake control of the Senate. The committee will consider legislation that, if approved, would push the controversial $7 billion project forward after years of resistance from environmental organizations and some Democrats in Congress. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) vowed to make Keystone a top issue, saying before the end of this year's session that it would be the first item brought to the floor by the GOP in 2015.
In November, the Senate--then still majority Democrat--rejected a bill to approve the Canada-to-Texas pipeline by a single vote. Republicans promised to move the bill forward once they took control of the Senate in January.
The January 7 hearing will be the first one held by new chairwoman Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).
If passed by Congress, the bill would still need a presidential permit to move forward. President Barack Obama has said that he would not approve the pipeline if it posed an environmental risk--which, as numerous climate groups and studies have noted, it does. After expressing growing skepticism about the project for months, Obama said last week that the pipeline would "not even have a nominal benefit" to American consumers, in his most forthright critique of Keystone yet.
But Republicans are hoping to garner the votes needed to allow them to push the project forward without requiring presidential approval.
Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida) said this week that he expects the chamber to have significant power over certain projects in 2015, including the pipeline. "I think we'll have a supermajority, a veto-proof majority," in cases like sanctions against Iran, Rubio told NPR. "I think the same is true of the Keystone pipeline, potentially."
May Boeve, executive director of 350.org, said of the failed November vote, "By dramatically accelerating tar sands oil development, Keystone XL clearly fails President Obama's own climate test. The pipeline is a lose-lose for everyone except TransCanada. The President has all the information he needs to reject this pipeline now, and we're going to stand by him to make sure he does."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is set to hold a hearing next week to discuss the Keystone XL pipeline.
The hearing will take place on January 7, once Republicans retake control of the Senate. The committee will consider legislation that, if approved, would push the controversial $7 billion project forward after years of resistance from environmental organizations and some Democrats in Congress. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) vowed to make Keystone a top issue, saying before the end of this year's session that it would be the first item brought to the floor by the GOP in 2015.
In November, the Senate--then still majority Democrat--rejected a bill to approve the Canada-to-Texas pipeline by a single vote. Republicans promised to move the bill forward once they took control of the Senate in January.
The January 7 hearing will be the first one held by new chairwoman Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).
If passed by Congress, the bill would still need a presidential permit to move forward. President Barack Obama has said that he would not approve the pipeline if it posed an environmental risk--which, as numerous climate groups and studies have noted, it does. After expressing growing skepticism about the project for months, Obama said last week that the pipeline would "not even have a nominal benefit" to American consumers, in his most forthright critique of Keystone yet.
But Republicans are hoping to garner the votes needed to allow them to push the project forward without requiring presidential approval.
Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida) said this week that he expects the chamber to have significant power over certain projects in 2015, including the pipeline. "I think we'll have a supermajority, a veto-proof majority," in cases like sanctions against Iran, Rubio told NPR. "I think the same is true of the Keystone pipeline, potentially."
May Boeve, executive director of 350.org, said of the failed November vote, "By dramatically accelerating tar sands oil development, Keystone XL clearly fails President Obama's own climate test. The pipeline is a lose-lose for everyone except TransCanada. The President has all the information he needs to reject this pipeline now, and we're going to stand by him to make sure he does."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is set to hold a hearing next week to discuss the Keystone XL pipeline.
The hearing will take place on January 7, once Republicans retake control of the Senate. The committee will consider legislation that, if approved, would push the controversial $7 billion project forward after years of resistance from environmental organizations and some Democrats in Congress. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) vowed to make Keystone a top issue, saying before the end of this year's session that it would be the first item brought to the floor by the GOP in 2015.
In November, the Senate--then still majority Democrat--rejected a bill to approve the Canada-to-Texas pipeline by a single vote. Republicans promised to move the bill forward once they took control of the Senate in January.
The January 7 hearing will be the first one held by new chairwoman Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska).
If passed by Congress, the bill would still need a presidential permit to move forward. President Barack Obama has said that he would not approve the pipeline if it posed an environmental risk--which, as numerous climate groups and studies have noted, it does. After expressing growing skepticism about the project for months, Obama said last week that the pipeline would "not even have a nominal benefit" to American consumers, in his most forthright critique of Keystone yet.
But Republicans are hoping to garner the votes needed to allow them to push the project forward without requiring presidential approval.
Senator Marco Rubio (R-Florida) said this week that he expects the chamber to have significant power over certain projects in 2015, including the pipeline. "I think we'll have a supermajority, a veto-proof majority," in cases like sanctions against Iran, Rubio told NPR. "I think the same is true of the Keystone pipeline, potentially."
May Boeve, executive director of 350.org, said of the failed November vote, "By dramatically accelerating tar sands oil development, Keystone XL clearly fails President Obama's own climate test. The pipeline is a lose-lose for everyone except TransCanada. The President has all the information he needs to reject this pipeline now, and we're going to stand by him to make sure he does."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.