SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A bill awaiting Gov. Christie's signature would make it easier for New Jersey's municipal water systems to be privatized. (Photo: Bart/flickr/cc)
New Jersey Poised to Pass Legislation That Would Speed Water Privatization
'The Legislature is selling out our clean water by turning New Jersey’s water supply over to foreign, multinational corporations.' — Jeff Tittel, New Jersey Sierra Club
Dec 23, 2014
A bill awaiting New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's signature will make privatizing municipal water systems easier and let "corporate profits replace meeting the needs of consumers and the environment," critics charge.
The legislation in question is the "Water Infrastructure Protection Act," which passed the Senate 21-16 on Thursday. The measure is sponsored by Republican Senator Joe Kyrillos and Democratic Senator Paul Sarlo.
The Herald reports that sales of municipal water systems to private entities would be fast-tracked because the bill would eliminate "a mandatory public vote on such deals and reduc[e] oversight of the sale price by the state Board of Public Utilities."
Jeff Tittel, Director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, wrote Tuesday that the governor should veto the bill, stating: "The Legislature is selling out our clean water by turning New Jersey's water supply over to foreign, multinational corporations."
Tittel called the bill "dangerous" and "undemocratic," and added: "Studies have shown that when public services are privatized, corporate profits replace meeting the needs of consumers and the environment."
Also cautioning against the measure is Stefanie Brand, Director of the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, an independent state agency that she says "gives consumers a voice in setting energy, water and telecommunications policy that will affect the rendering of utility services well into the future."
In remarks delivered this month to the Assembly State and Local Government Committee, she said: "Investor-owned utilities could run wild in an effort to submit the highest bid knowing that they bear no risk and will be subject to no regulatory oversight. Meanwhile, ratepayers will be required to pay for the full purchase price in rates, and will pay for these higher bids."
Kyrillos, in contrast, touts the bill as allowing aging infrastructure to be taken over by people with "know-how."
"The challenges of maintaining and replacing aging water infrastructure can escalate quickly beyond the technical and financial means of government entities and taxpayers. Despite this, current law makes it nearly impossible to let those with sufficient resources and know-how to take over these systems and effectively address emergent conditions," he said in a statement issued last week.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A bill awaiting New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's signature will make privatizing municipal water systems easier and let "corporate profits replace meeting the needs of consumers and the environment," critics charge.
The legislation in question is the "Water Infrastructure Protection Act," which passed the Senate 21-16 on Thursday. The measure is sponsored by Republican Senator Joe Kyrillos and Democratic Senator Paul Sarlo.
The Herald reports that sales of municipal water systems to private entities would be fast-tracked because the bill would eliminate "a mandatory public vote on such deals and reduc[e] oversight of the sale price by the state Board of Public Utilities."
Jeff Tittel, Director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, wrote Tuesday that the governor should veto the bill, stating: "The Legislature is selling out our clean water by turning New Jersey's water supply over to foreign, multinational corporations."
Tittel called the bill "dangerous" and "undemocratic," and added: "Studies have shown that when public services are privatized, corporate profits replace meeting the needs of consumers and the environment."
Also cautioning against the measure is Stefanie Brand, Director of the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, an independent state agency that she says "gives consumers a voice in setting energy, water and telecommunications policy that will affect the rendering of utility services well into the future."
In remarks delivered this month to the Assembly State and Local Government Committee, she said: "Investor-owned utilities could run wild in an effort to submit the highest bid knowing that they bear no risk and will be subject to no regulatory oversight. Meanwhile, ratepayers will be required to pay for the full purchase price in rates, and will pay for these higher bids."
Kyrillos, in contrast, touts the bill as allowing aging infrastructure to be taken over by people with "know-how."
"The challenges of maintaining and replacing aging water infrastructure can escalate quickly beyond the technical and financial means of government entities and taxpayers. Despite this, current law makes it nearly impossible to let those with sufficient resources and know-how to take over these systems and effectively address emergent conditions," he said in a statement issued last week.
A bill awaiting New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's signature will make privatizing municipal water systems easier and let "corporate profits replace meeting the needs of consumers and the environment," critics charge.
The legislation in question is the "Water Infrastructure Protection Act," which passed the Senate 21-16 on Thursday. The measure is sponsored by Republican Senator Joe Kyrillos and Democratic Senator Paul Sarlo.
The Herald reports that sales of municipal water systems to private entities would be fast-tracked because the bill would eliminate "a mandatory public vote on such deals and reduc[e] oversight of the sale price by the state Board of Public Utilities."
Jeff Tittel, Director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, wrote Tuesday that the governor should veto the bill, stating: "The Legislature is selling out our clean water by turning New Jersey's water supply over to foreign, multinational corporations."
Tittel called the bill "dangerous" and "undemocratic," and added: "Studies have shown that when public services are privatized, corporate profits replace meeting the needs of consumers and the environment."
Also cautioning against the measure is Stefanie Brand, Director of the New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, an independent state agency that she says "gives consumers a voice in setting energy, water and telecommunications policy that will affect the rendering of utility services well into the future."
In remarks delivered this month to the Assembly State and Local Government Committee, she said: "Investor-owned utilities could run wild in an effort to submit the highest bid knowing that they bear no risk and will be subject to no regulatory oversight. Meanwhile, ratepayers will be required to pay for the full purchase price in rates, and will pay for these higher bids."
Kyrillos, in contrast, touts the bill as allowing aging infrastructure to be taken over by people with "know-how."
"The challenges of maintaining and replacing aging water infrastructure can escalate quickly beyond the technical and financial means of government entities and taxpayers. Despite this, current law makes it nearly impossible to let those with sufficient resources and know-how to take over these systems and effectively address emergent conditions," he said in a statement issued last week.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.