SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Military Failing to Treat, Or Even Track, Exposure to Chemical Weapons
NYT report reveals that, in addition to Iraqi and Iranian civilians, U.S. service members have likely been placed in harm's way with little recourse
Nov 07, 2014
The Pentagon has failed to adequately treat--or even track--over 600 U.S. service members who report that they were exposed to degraded chemical weapons agents while they were deployed to Iraq after the 2003 invasion, the New York Times revealed Friday.
The report--which references long-documented chemical arms stockpiles developed by Saddam Hussein's government during the 1980s in collaboration with the United States and other western states--reveals that, in addition to Iraqi and Iranian civilians, U.S. service members have likely been placed in harm's way with little recourse.
The chemical weapons stockpiles referenced in the article are not the same as the non-existent "weapons of mass destruction (WMDs)" former President George W. Bush used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq, of which Bush and top aides told nearly one-thousand documented lies.
The Times article is a follow-up to a previous investigation, published in October, which disclosed 17 cases of service members' injuries due to contact with sarin or a sulfur mustard agent and revealed that the U.S. military had suppressed information about the exposure. Since the October investigation, hundreds of service members have reported to the military that they believe they were exposed, according to a review of Pentagon data ordered by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the Times reported Friday.
The chemical weapons were supplied to Iraq during the 1980s--a time when the U.S. and other western nations backed Saddam Hussein's program to develop Iraq's chemical arms program to aid in the war with Iran. As Murtaza Hussain points out in The Intercept, the United States has long been aware of the degraded arms' existence and location.
The Times report does not investigate the vast impact of these chemical weapons on Iraqi or Iranian civilians or combatants, which includes at least 50,000 Iranian casualties and lingering public health impacts.
Furthermore, it does not address direct use of toxic weapons by the U.S. in Iraq, including depleted uranium in the 1991 Gulf War and chemical weapon white phosphorous used in the 2004 U.S. attack on Fallujah. Iraqi civil society organizations have repeatedly warned of the dangers presented to local populations by U.S. weapons, including high rates of cancer and birth defects.
Meanwhile, analysts warn that hawkish forces are seizing on the Times' new reporting of the chemical weapons to retroactively justify the 2003 invasion. "The fact that people thoroughly invested in supporting the war apparently had no idea about this is in many ways emblematic of their complete cluelessness about the country which they helped destroy," wrote Murtaza Hussain.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The Pentagon has failed to adequately treat--or even track--over 600 U.S. service members who report that they were exposed to degraded chemical weapons agents while they were deployed to Iraq after the 2003 invasion, the New York Times revealed Friday.
The report--which references long-documented chemical arms stockpiles developed by Saddam Hussein's government during the 1980s in collaboration with the United States and other western states--reveals that, in addition to Iraqi and Iranian civilians, U.S. service members have likely been placed in harm's way with little recourse.
The chemical weapons stockpiles referenced in the article are not the same as the non-existent "weapons of mass destruction (WMDs)" former President George W. Bush used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq, of which Bush and top aides told nearly one-thousand documented lies.
The Times article is a follow-up to a previous investigation, published in October, which disclosed 17 cases of service members' injuries due to contact with sarin or a sulfur mustard agent and revealed that the U.S. military had suppressed information about the exposure. Since the October investigation, hundreds of service members have reported to the military that they believe they were exposed, according to a review of Pentagon data ordered by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the Times reported Friday.
The chemical weapons were supplied to Iraq during the 1980s--a time when the U.S. and other western nations backed Saddam Hussein's program to develop Iraq's chemical arms program to aid in the war with Iran. As Murtaza Hussain points out in The Intercept, the United States has long been aware of the degraded arms' existence and location.
The Times report does not investigate the vast impact of these chemical weapons on Iraqi or Iranian civilians or combatants, which includes at least 50,000 Iranian casualties and lingering public health impacts.
Furthermore, it does not address direct use of toxic weapons by the U.S. in Iraq, including depleted uranium in the 1991 Gulf War and chemical weapon white phosphorous used in the 2004 U.S. attack on Fallujah. Iraqi civil society organizations have repeatedly warned of the dangers presented to local populations by U.S. weapons, including high rates of cancer and birth defects.
Meanwhile, analysts warn that hawkish forces are seizing on the Times' new reporting of the chemical weapons to retroactively justify the 2003 invasion. "The fact that people thoroughly invested in supporting the war apparently had no idea about this is in many ways emblematic of their complete cluelessness about the country which they helped destroy," wrote Murtaza Hussain.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare is the editor of Workday Magazine and a contributing editor for In These Times. She is a former Staff Writer at Common Dreams. She comes from a background in independent journalism for publications including The Intercept, The Nation, and Tom Dispatch.
The Pentagon has failed to adequately treat--or even track--over 600 U.S. service members who report that they were exposed to degraded chemical weapons agents while they were deployed to Iraq after the 2003 invasion, the New York Times revealed Friday.
The report--which references long-documented chemical arms stockpiles developed by Saddam Hussein's government during the 1980s in collaboration with the United States and other western states--reveals that, in addition to Iraqi and Iranian civilians, U.S. service members have likely been placed in harm's way with little recourse.
The chemical weapons stockpiles referenced in the article are not the same as the non-existent "weapons of mass destruction (WMDs)" former President George W. Bush used to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq, of which Bush and top aides told nearly one-thousand documented lies.
The Times article is a follow-up to a previous investigation, published in October, which disclosed 17 cases of service members' injuries due to contact with sarin or a sulfur mustard agent and revealed that the U.S. military had suppressed information about the exposure. Since the October investigation, hundreds of service members have reported to the military that they believe they were exposed, according to a review of Pentagon data ordered by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the Times reported Friday.
The chemical weapons were supplied to Iraq during the 1980s--a time when the U.S. and other western nations backed Saddam Hussein's program to develop Iraq's chemical arms program to aid in the war with Iran. As Murtaza Hussain points out in The Intercept, the United States has long been aware of the degraded arms' existence and location.
The Times report does not investigate the vast impact of these chemical weapons on Iraqi or Iranian civilians or combatants, which includes at least 50,000 Iranian casualties and lingering public health impacts.
Furthermore, it does not address direct use of toxic weapons by the U.S. in Iraq, including depleted uranium in the 1991 Gulf War and chemical weapon white phosphorous used in the 2004 U.S. attack on Fallujah. Iraqi civil society organizations have repeatedly warned of the dangers presented to local populations by U.S. weapons, including high rates of cancer and birth defects.
Meanwhile, analysts warn that hawkish forces are seizing on the Times' new reporting of the chemical weapons to retroactively justify the 2003 invasion. "The fact that people thoroughly invested in supporting the war apparently had no idea about this is in many ways emblematic of their complete cluelessness about the country which they helped destroy," wrote Murtaza Hussain.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.