SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Cornell Woolridge of Windsor Mill, Md., holds protest signs in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in October 2013. (Photo: NickPrete)
As Expected, Big Money Flood Grows Bigger in Wake of McCutcheon Ruling
Center for Responsive Politics data shows wealthy donors have already contributed $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before ruling
Sep 02, 2014
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.