As Expected, Big Money Flood Grows Bigger in Wake of McCutcheon Ruling
Center for Responsive Politics data shows wealthy donors have already contributed $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before ruling
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.
Five months after the U.S. Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling struck down certain limits to the campaign contributions, the election cycle is already flooded with more money from wealthy individuals that would not have been allowed prior to the decision.
By the end of June, at least 310 donors who spent above the pre-McCutcheon cap had already contributed a total of $49.8 million -- $11.6 million more than would have been permitted before the April ruling, according to data from the research organization Center for Responsive Politics. While these donors favors Republicans two to one, they also write big checks to Democrats.
Who are these wealthy individuals? Some are well-known, politically influential billionaires, including Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson, and George Soros. Others are hedge fund managers, real estate magnates, and wealthy business people. At 310 people so far, they represent less than one in a million Americans, analysts at the Center for Responsive Politics point out.
According to Matea Gold writing for the Washington Post, many of these donors are thrilled with their boosted political access and influence following the highly controversial court ruling.
"You have to realize, when you start contributing to all these guys, they give you access to meet them and talk about your issues," Andrew Sabin, a wealthy donor who surpassed pre-McCutcheon limits, told the Post.
Like the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, the McCutcheon ruling reduced the government's ability to limit campaign contributions. The latter scrapped the maximum aggregate amount that individuals can donate to candidates and political parties -- which had previously stood at $123,200 total -- during a two year election cycle, meaning individuals can now donate an aggregate of $3.6 million.