SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New USDA Poultry Inspection Rules Jeopardize Public Health, say Critics
Food safety advocates decry 'tremendous blow' to inspection system.
Aug 01, 2014
The United States Department of Agriculture announced on Thursday new rules for its poultry inspection program that critics fear still leave food and worker safety at risk.
In a statement announcing the overhaul, the USDA says the new system will "prevent thousands of illnesses each year." But under the new rules, some of the inspections that had been done by USDA inspectors will now be done by the companies themselves, a situation critics have called "the fox guarding the hen house."
The Government Accountability Project's Food Integrity Campaign (FIC) is among those who have sounded alarm about the plan.
Alyssa Doom, Investigation & Outreach Coordinator for the FIC, writes that this shifting of inspections to the company
poses a clear conflict of interest. According to inspectors, companies' only goals are to get as much product out their doors as quickly as possible. Retired inspector and USDA whistleblower Phyllis McKelvey spent years working in one of the model's pilot plants and has reported that consumer health will be seriously impacted by this rule. Untrained company workers do not have the power to question their supervisors, which could certainly result in unfit products destined for consumers' plates.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) National President J. David Cox Sr. similarly admonished the privatization of inspection, issuing a statement that "the loss of independent, government poultry inspectors is a tremendous blow to an inspection system that helps ensure our nation's food safety. "
"With more than 600 people sick from the Foster Farms outbreak alone," added Center for Science in the Public Interest food safety director Caroline Smith DeWaal, "this is hardly the time to reduce USDA's oversight of the poultry industry."
Though the USDA states that "in response to public comment, the maximum line speeds for plants that newly adopt the [New Poultry Inspection System] have remained capped at 140 birds per minute," Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter says this is not enough.
"This is not a meaningful victory because there are not accompanying worker safety regulations to deal with the musculoskeletal disorders and other work-related injuries that both the plant workers and USDA inspectors suffer every day working in the poultry slaughter plants. In addition, the one USDA inspector left on the slaughter line under this new rule will still have to inspect 2.33 birds every second - an impossible task that leaves consumers at risk," a statement from Hauter reads.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The United States Department of Agriculture announced on Thursday new rules for its poultry inspection program that critics fear still leave food and worker safety at risk.
In a statement announcing the overhaul, the USDA says the new system will "prevent thousands of illnesses each year." But under the new rules, some of the inspections that had been done by USDA inspectors will now be done by the companies themselves, a situation critics have called "the fox guarding the hen house."
The Government Accountability Project's Food Integrity Campaign (FIC) is among those who have sounded alarm about the plan.
Alyssa Doom, Investigation & Outreach Coordinator for the FIC, writes that this shifting of inspections to the company
poses a clear conflict of interest. According to inspectors, companies' only goals are to get as much product out their doors as quickly as possible. Retired inspector and USDA whistleblower Phyllis McKelvey spent years working in one of the model's pilot plants and has reported that consumer health will be seriously impacted by this rule. Untrained company workers do not have the power to question their supervisors, which could certainly result in unfit products destined for consumers' plates.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) National President J. David Cox Sr. similarly admonished the privatization of inspection, issuing a statement that "the loss of independent, government poultry inspectors is a tremendous blow to an inspection system that helps ensure our nation's food safety. "
"With more than 600 people sick from the Foster Farms outbreak alone," added Center for Science in the Public Interest food safety director Caroline Smith DeWaal, "this is hardly the time to reduce USDA's oversight of the poultry industry."
Though the USDA states that "in response to public comment, the maximum line speeds for plants that newly adopt the [New Poultry Inspection System] have remained capped at 140 birds per minute," Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter says this is not enough.
"This is not a meaningful victory because there are not accompanying worker safety regulations to deal with the musculoskeletal disorders and other work-related injuries that both the plant workers and USDA inspectors suffer every day working in the poultry slaughter plants. In addition, the one USDA inspector left on the slaughter line under this new rule will still have to inspect 2.33 birds every second - an impossible task that leaves consumers at risk," a statement from Hauter reads.
The United States Department of Agriculture announced on Thursday new rules for its poultry inspection program that critics fear still leave food and worker safety at risk.
In a statement announcing the overhaul, the USDA says the new system will "prevent thousands of illnesses each year." But under the new rules, some of the inspections that had been done by USDA inspectors will now be done by the companies themselves, a situation critics have called "the fox guarding the hen house."
The Government Accountability Project's Food Integrity Campaign (FIC) is among those who have sounded alarm about the plan.
Alyssa Doom, Investigation & Outreach Coordinator for the FIC, writes that this shifting of inspections to the company
poses a clear conflict of interest. According to inspectors, companies' only goals are to get as much product out their doors as quickly as possible. Retired inspector and USDA whistleblower Phyllis McKelvey spent years working in one of the model's pilot plants and has reported that consumer health will be seriously impacted by this rule. Untrained company workers do not have the power to question their supervisors, which could certainly result in unfit products destined for consumers' plates.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) National President J. David Cox Sr. similarly admonished the privatization of inspection, issuing a statement that "the loss of independent, government poultry inspectors is a tremendous blow to an inspection system that helps ensure our nation's food safety. "
"With more than 600 people sick from the Foster Farms outbreak alone," added Center for Science in the Public Interest food safety director Caroline Smith DeWaal, "this is hardly the time to reduce USDA's oversight of the poultry industry."
Though the USDA states that "in response to public comment, the maximum line speeds for plants that newly adopt the [New Poultry Inspection System] have remained capped at 140 birds per minute," Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter says this is not enough.
"This is not a meaningful victory because there are not accompanying worker safety regulations to deal with the musculoskeletal disorders and other work-related injuries that both the plant workers and USDA inspectors suffer every day working in the poultry slaughter plants. In addition, the one USDA inspector left on the slaughter line under this new rule will still have to inspect 2.33 birds every second - an impossible task that leaves consumers at risk," a statement from Hauter reads.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.